AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY
The aim of study was to investigate collective efficacy and team cohesion levels of successful (N=35) and unsuccessful (N=40) handball players. Group Environment Questionnaire and Collective Efficacy Scale were used to collect the data. The results indicated non-significant difference in the ATG-T-1...
| Main Authors: | , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Pamukkale University
2013-01-01
|
| Series: | Pamukkale Spor Bilimleri Dergisi |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://psbd.pau.edu.tr/index.php/pjss/article/view/104/pdf |
| _version_ | 1797916552523153408 |
|---|---|
| author | Serdar Kocaekşi Ziya Koruç |
| author_facet | Serdar Kocaekşi Ziya Koruç |
| author_sort | Serdar Kocaekşi |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The aim of study was to investigate collective efficacy and team cohesion levels of successful (N=35) and unsuccessful (N=40) handball players. Group Environment Questionnaire and Collective Efficacy Scale were used to collect the data. The results indicated non-significant difference in the ATG-T-1 (F=2.750; p=.102) and ATG-T-2 (F=3.258; p=.075) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams. A significant difference was found in the ATG-S-1 (F=3.959; p=.050) and ATG-S–2 (F=5.922; p=.017) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams (p<0.05). Results revealed non- difference found between successful and unsuccessful teams’ GI-T-1 levels (F=.256; p=.614), however a significant difference was found between successful and unsuccessful teams’ GI-T2 results (F=30.698; p=.000). The results indicated non- significant difference in the GI-S-1 (F=1.867; p=.176)and GI-S-2 (F=.316; p=.576) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams (p>0.05). A significant different was found in the Collective Efficacy-1 (F=19.885; p=.000) and Collective Efficacy–2 (F=32.971;p=.000) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams (p<0.05). Findings suggested that collective efficacy of successful and unsuccessful teams are different. |
| first_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:59:10Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-299666684bb34a05b80f0695189af595 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1309-0356 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-04-10T12:59:10Z |
| publishDate | 2013-01-01 |
| publisher | Pamukkale University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Pamukkale Spor Bilimleri Dergisi |
| spelling | doaj.art-299666684bb34a05b80f0695189af5952023-02-15T16:13:17ZengPamukkale UniversityPamukkale Spor Bilimleri Dergisi1309-03562013-01-0141127134AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEYSerdar KocaekşiZiya KoruçThe aim of study was to investigate collective efficacy and team cohesion levels of successful (N=35) and unsuccessful (N=40) handball players. Group Environment Questionnaire and Collective Efficacy Scale were used to collect the data. The results indicated non-significant difference in the ATG-T-1 (F=2.750; p=.102) and ATG-T-2 (F=3.258; p=.075) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams. A significant difference was found in the ATG-S-1 (F=3.959; p=.050) and ATG-S–2 (F=5.922; p=.017) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams (p<0.05). Results revealed non- difference found between successful and unsuccessful teams’ GI-T-1 levels (F=.256; p=.614), however a significant difference was found between successful and unsuccessful teams’ GI-T2 results (F=30.698; p=.000). The results indicated non- significant difference in the GI-S-1 (F=1.867; p=.176)and GI-S-2 (F=.316; p=.576) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams (p>0.05). A significant different was found in the Collective Efficacy-1 (F=19.885; p=.000) and Collective Efficacy–2 (F=32.971;p=.000) levels of successful and unsuccessful teams (p<0.05). Findings suggested that collective efficacy of successful and unsuccessful teams are different.http://psbd.pau.edu.tr/index.php/pjss/article/view/104/pdfCohesioncollective efficacysuccesshandball |
| spellingShingle | Serdar Kocaekşi Ziya Koruç AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY Pamukkale Spor Bilimleri Dergisi Cohesion collective efficacy success handball |
| title | AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY |
| title_full | AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY |
| title_fullStr | AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY |
| title_full_unstemmed | AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY |
| title_short | AN INVESTIGATION OF COLLECTIVE EFFICACY AND TEAM COHESION LEVELS OF SUCCESSFUL AND UNSUCCESSFUL HANDBALL PLAYERS IN TURKEY |
| title_sort | investigation of collective efficacy and team cohesion levels of successful and unsuccessful handball players in turkey |
| topic | Cohesion collective efficacy success handball |
| url | http://psbd.pau.edu.tr/index.php/pjss/article/view/104/pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT serdarkocaeksi aninvestigationofcollectiveefficacyandteamcohesionlevelsofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulhandballplayersinturkey AT ziyakoruc aninvestigationofcollectiveefficacyandteamcohesionlevelsofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulhandballplayersinturkey AT serdarkocaeksi investigationofcollectiveefficacyandteamcohesionlevelsofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulhandballplayersinturkey AT ziyakoruc investigationofcollectiveefficacyandteamcohesionlevelsofsuccessfulandunsuccessfulhandballplayersinturkey |