Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China

ObjectivesTo understand the knowledge, attitude, willingness, and ability of healthcare professionals working in newborn screening (NBS) centers regarding newborn genetic screening (nGS).MethodsThe questionnaire consisted of four sections with 27 questions and the data were collected by the WJX plat...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xian Wu, Yuqi Yang, Lingna Zhou, Wei Long, Bin Yu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-05-01
Series:Frontiers in Pediatrics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.875229/full
_version_ 1818028435422838784
author Xian Wu
Yuqi Yang
Lingna Zhou
Wei Long
Bin Yu
author_facet Xian Wu
Yuqi Yang
Lingna Zhou
Wei Long
Bin Yu
author_sort Xian Wu
collection DOAJ
description ObjectivesTo understand the knowledge, attitude, willingness, and ability of healthcare professionals working in newborn screening (NBS) centers regarding newborn genetic screening (nGS).MethodsThe questionnaire consisted of four sections with 27 questions and the data were collected by the WJX platform. All participants accessed the questionnaire by scanning a specific QR code with their mobile phones. Two researchers independently completed the summary and analysis.ResultsA total of 258 valid questionnaires were collected from 43 NBS centers in six provinces of southeast China. In total, 209 (81.01%) participants were interested in nGS, and almost all participants (97.67%) thought that nGS was necessary in China. About 89.53% of participants thought that it could be used to effectively expand the diseases that could be screened, but 72.87% also worried about the inability to provide genetic counseling. About 55.34% suggested that nGS and tandem mass spectrometry (TMS) screening could be applied in a unite screening mode. The higher the institution and personal education levels, the higher the interest healthcare professionals displayed toward nGS. However, they also showed greater concern about the inability to provide genetic counseling and ethical issues. If a center had engaged in TMS screening, its staff would have been more likely to believe that nGS had great advantages. In addition, most participants had ethical concerns, such as “the psychological burden caused by carrying information regarding adult morbidity risk.”ConclusionMost participants were interested and considered nGS necessary. The inability to provide genetic counseling may be the primary impediment to clinical practice. Three important influencing factors were level of education, institution level, and engagement in TMS screening.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T05:03:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2997bf7a079d44a5b2d17a70a75ef397
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2296-2360
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T05:03:45Z
publishDate 2022-05-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Pediatrics
spelling doaj.art-2997bf7a079d44a5b2d17a70a75ef3972022-12-22T02:01:19ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Pediatrics2296-23602022-05-011010.3389/fped.2022.875229875229Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast ChinaXian WuYuqi YangLingna ZhouWei LongBin YuObjectivesTo understand the knowledge, attitude, willingness, and ability of healthcare professionals working in newborn screening (NBS) centers regarding newborn genetic screening (nGS).MethodsThe questionnaire consisted of four sections with 27 questions and the data were collected by the WJX platform. All participants accessed the questionnaire by scanning a specific QR code with their mobile phones. Two researchers independently completed the summary and analysis.ResultsA total of 258 valid questionnaires were collected from 43 NBS centers in six provinces of southeast China. In total, 209 (81.01%) participants were interested in nGS, and almost all participants (97.67%) thought that nGS was necessary in China. About 89.53% of participants thought that it could be used to effectively expand the diseases that could be screened, but 72.87% also worried about the inability to provide genetic counseling. About 55.34% suggested that nGS and tandem mass spectrometry (TMS) screening could be applied in a unite screening mode. The higher the institution and personal education levels, the higher the interest healthcare professionals displayed toward nGS. However, they also showed greater concern about the inability to provide genetic counseling and ethical issues. If a center had engaged in TMS screening, its staff would have been more likely to believe that nGS had great advantages. In addition, most participants had ethical concerns, such as “the psychological burden caused by carrying information regarding adult morbidity risk.”ConclusionMost participants were interested and considered nGS necessary. The inability to provide genetic counseling may be the primary impediment to clinical practice. Three important influencing factors were level of education, institution level, and engagement in TMS screening.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.875229/fullnewborn screeningquestionnairehealthcare professionalsknowledgeattitudenewborn genetic screening
spellingShingle Xian Wu
Yuqi Yang
Lingna Zhou
Wei Long
Bin Yu
Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China
Frontiers in Pediatrics
newborn screening
questionnaire
healthcare professionals
knowledge
attitude
newborn genetic screening
title Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China
title_full Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China
title_fullStr Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China
title_full_unstemmed Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China
title_short Are We Ready for Newborn Genetic Screening? A Cross-Sectional Survey of Healthcare Professionals in Southeast China
title_sort are we ready for newborn genetic screening a cross sectional survey of healthcare professionals in southeast china
topic newborn screening
questionnaire
healthcare professionals
knowledge
attitude
newborn genetic screening
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fped.2022.875229/full
work_keys_str_mv AT xianwu arewereadyfornewborngeneticscreeningacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinsoutheastchina
AT yuqiyang arewereadyfornewborngeneticscreeningacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinsoutheastchina
AT lingnazhou arewereadyfornewborngeneticscreeningacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinsoutheastchina
AT weilong arewereadyfornewborngeneticscreeningacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinsoutheastchina
AT binyu arewereadyfornewborngeneticscreeningacrosssectionalsurveyofhealthcareprofessionalsinsoutheastchina