Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review
The objective of this systematic review was to identify and classify, from the available literature, non-conventional feed ingredients from terrestrial plants, animals, algae, and fungi which have been evaluated for their potential use for tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) production. Fo...
| Main Authors: | , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
MDPI AG
2023-11-01
|
| Series: | Fishes |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/11/556 |
| _version_ | 1797459308925943808 |
|---|---|
| author | Christian David Zuluaga-Hernández Carlos A. Hincapié Marisol Osorio |
| author_facet | Christian David Zuluaga-Hernández Carlos A. Hincapié Marisol Osorio |
| author_sort | Christian David Zuluaga-Hernández |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | The objective of this systematic review was to identify and classify, from the available literature, non-conventional feed ingredients from terrestrial plants, animals, algae, and fungi which have been evaluated for their potential use for tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) production. For this purpose, 795 papers published in the Scopus and Web of Science databases between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Data on the growth rate (GR) and effects on weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR) and feed conversion ratio (FCR); digestibility; fatty acid profile (FAP) of the fish carcass; and the survival rate (SR) were compiled in databases and summary tables. The results were refined according to different criteria, obtaining 144 documents that were pertinent for an in-depth analysis. From those, we found that 50.7% evaluated terrestrial plants, 22.2% animals, 13.9% algae, 9% fungi, and the remaining, combinations of some of the above categories. From the summarized results we concluded that most of the non-conventional sources analyzed have a positive potential impact as alternatives for producing tilapia. Survival was the most evaluated parameter, while digestibility was the least evaluated parameter. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:49:36Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-299c4b713e5f4d269da7e8459c5eb3d6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2410-3888 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T16:49:36Z |
| publishDate | 2023-11-01 |
| publisher | MDPI AG |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Fishes |
| spelling | doaj.art-299c4b713e5f4d269da7e8459c5eb3d62023-11-24T14:41:43ZengMDPI AGFishes2410-38882023-11-0181155610.3390/fishes8110556Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic ReviewChristian David Zuluaga-Hernández0Carlos A. Hincapié1Marisol Osorio2Agroindustrial Research Group (GRAIN), Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Bolivariana University, Medellín P.O. Box 050004, ColombiaAgroindustrial Research Group (GRAIN), Faculty of Agroindustrial Engineering, School of Engineering, Pontificia Bolivariana University, Medellín P.O. Box 050004, ColombiaTechnology and Innovation Management Research Group, Centre for Basic Science, School of Engineering, Pontificia Bolivariana University, Medellín P.O. Box 050004, ColombiaThe objective of this systematic review was to identify and classify, from the available literature, non-conventional feed ingredients from terrestrial plants, animals, algae, and fungi which have been evaluated for their potential use for tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) production. For this purpose, 795 papers published in the Scopus and Web of Science databases between 2011 and 2021 were analyzed using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. Data on the growth rate (GR) and effects on weight gain (WG), specific growth rate (SGR) and feed conversion ratio (FCR); digestibility; fatty acid profile (FAP) of the fish carcass; and the survival rate (SR) were compiled in databases and summary tables. The results were refined according to different criteria, obtaining 144 documents that were pertinent for an in-depth analysis. From those, we found that 50.7% evaluated terrestrial plants, 22.2% animals, 13.9% algae, 9% fungi, and the remaining, combinations of some of the above categories. From the summarized results we concluded that most of the non-conventional sources analyzed have a positive potential impact as alternatives for producing tilapia. Survival was the most evaluated parameter, while digestibility was the least evaluated parameter.https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/11/556tilapianutritional supplementPRISMAfish feed |
| spellingShingle | Christian David Zuluaga-Hernández Carlos A. Hincapié Marisol Osorio Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review Fishes tilapia nutritional supplement PRISMA fish feed |
| title | Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review |
| title_full | Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review |
| title_fullStr | Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review |
| title_full_unstemmed | Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review |
| title_short | Non-Conventional Ingredients for Tilapia (<i>Oreochromis</i> spp.) Feed: A Systematic Review |
| title_sort | non conventional ingredients for tilapia i oreochromis i spp feed a systematic review |
| topic | tilapia nutritional supplement PRISMA fish feed |
| url | https://www.mdpi.com/2410-3888/8/11/556 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT christiandavidzuluagahernandez nonconventionalingredientsfortilapiaioreochromisisppfeedasystematicreview AT carlosahincapie nonconventionalingredientsfortilapiaioreochromisisppfeedasystematicreview AT marisolosorio nonconventionalingredientsfortilapiaioreochromisisppfeedasystematicreview |