A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH

ABSTRACT William James makes several major claims about truth: (i) truth means agreement with reality independently of the knower, (ii) truth is made by human beings, (iii) truth can be verified, and (iv) truth is necessarily good. These claims give rise to a few puzzles: (i) and (ii) seem to contra...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Xingming Hu
Format: Article
Language:deu
Published: Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais 2016-12-01
Series:Kriterion
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v57n135/0100-512X-kr-57-135-0803.pdf
_version_ 1819002872644239360
author Xingming Hu
author_facet Xingming Hu
author_sort Xingming Hu
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT William James makes several major claims about truth: (i) truth means agreement with reality independently of the knower, (ii) truth is made by human beings, (iii) truth can be verified, and (iv) truth is necessarily good. These claims give rise to a few puzzles: (i) and (ii) seem to contradict each other, and each of (ii), (iii), and (iv) has counter-intuitive implications. I argue that Richard Gale's interpretation of James' theory of truth is inadequate in dealing with these puzzles. I propose an alternative interpretation and show how it can solve these puzzles.
first_indexed 2024-12-20T23:12:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29a028aa728b4437a9138bb1d59824e2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0100-512X
language deu
last_indexed 2024-12-20T23:12:01Z
publishDate 2016-12-01
publisher Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais
record_format Article
series Kriterion
spelling doaj.art-29a028aa728b4437a9138bb1d59824e22022-12-21T19:23:43ZdeuUniversidade Federal de Minas GeraisKriterion0100-512X2016-12-015713580382110.1590/0100-512x2016n13511xhA FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTHXingming HuABSTRACT William James makes several major claims about truth: (i) truth means agreement with reality independently of the knower, (ii) truth is made by human beings, (iii) truth can be verified, and (iv) truth is necessarily good. These claims give rise to a few puzzles: (i) and (ii) seem to contradict each other, and each of (ii), (iii), and (iv) has counter-intuitive implications. I argue that Richard Gale's interpretation of James' theory of truth is inadequate in dealing with these puzzles. I propose an alternative interpretation and show how it can solve these puzzles.http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v57n135/0100-512X-kr-57-135-0803.pdfWilliam Jamestruthverificationrealityrelativismdesire-satisfaction
spellingShingle Xingming Hu
A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH
Kriterion
William James
truth
verification
reality
relativism
desire-satisfaction
title A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH
title_full A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH
title_fullStr A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH
title_full_unstemmed A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH
title_short A FEW PUZZLES ABOUT WILLIAM JAMES' THEORY OF TRUTH
title_sort few puzzles about william james theory of truth
topic William James
truth
verification
reality
relativism
desire-satisfaction
url http://www.scielo.br/pdf/kr/v57n135/0100-512X-kr-57-135-0803.pdf
work_keys_str_mv AT xingminghu afewpuzzlesaboutwilliamjamestheoryoftruth
AT xingminghu fewpuzzlesaboutwilliamjamestheoryoftruth