Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle

Cloning multiple animals from genomically selected donor embryos is inefficient but would accelerate genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding. To improve embryo cloning efficiency, we explored the idea that epigenetic reprogramming improves when donor cells are in mitosis. We derived primary cultures f...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sarah Jane Appleby, Pavla Misica‐Turner, Fleur Catherine Oback, Arindam Dhali, Zachariah Louis McLean, Björn Oback
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2022-09-01
Series:Frontiers in Genetics
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.933534/full
_version_ 1811180711574503424
author Sarah Jane Appleby
Sarah Jane Appleby
Pavla Misica‐Turner
Fleur Catherine Oback
Arindam Dhali
Zachariah Louis McLean
Zachariah Louis McLean
Björn Oback
Björn Oback
Björn Oback
author_facet Sarah Jane Appleby
Sarah Jane Appleby
Pavla Misica‐Turner
Fleur Catherine Oback
Arindam Dhali
Zachariah Louis McLean
Zachariah Louis McLean
Björn Oback
Björn Oback
Björn Oback
author_sort Sarah Jane Appleby
collection DOAJ
description Cloning multiple animals from genomically selected donor embryos is inefficient but would accelerate genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding. To improve embryo cloning efficiency, we explored the idea that epigenetic reprogramming improves when donor cells are in mitosis. We derived primary cultures from bovine inner cell mass (ICM) cells of in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. Cells were grown feeder-free in a chemically defined medium with increased double kinase inhibition (2i+). Adding recombinant bovine interleukin 6 to 2i+ medium improved plating efficiency, outgrowth expansion, and expression of pluripotency-associated epiblast marker genes (NANOG, FGF4, SOX2, and DPPA3). For genotype multiplication by embryonic cell transfer (ECT) cloning, primary colonies were treated with nocodazole, and single mitotic donors were harvested by mechanical shake-off. Immunofluorescence against phosphorylated histone 3 (P-H3) showed 37% of nocodazole-treated cells in metaphase compared to 6% in DMSO controls (P < 1 × 10−5), with an average of 53% of P-H3-positive cells expressing the pluripotency marker SOX2. We optimized several parameters (fusion buffer, pronase treatment, and activation timing) for ECT with mitotic embryonic donors. Sequential double cytoplast ECT, whereby another cytoplast was fused to the first cloned reconstruct, doubled cloned blastocyst development and improved morphological embryo quality. However, in situ karyotyping revealed that over 90% of mitotic ECT-derived blastocysts were tetraploid or aneuploid with extra chromosomes, compared to less than 2% in the original ICM donor cells. Following the transfer of single vs. double cytoplast embryos, there was no difference between the two methods in pregnancy establishment at D35 (1/22 = 5% vs. 4/53 = 8% for single vs. double ECT, respectively). Overall, post-implantation development was drastically reduced from embryonic mitotic clones when compared to somatic interphase clones and IVF controls. We conclude that mitotic donors cause ploidy errors during in vitro development that cannot be rescued by enhanced epigenetic reprogramming through double cytoplast cloning.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:08:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29a44c97dd1949608bc628ea1d562227
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-8021
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:08:01Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Genetics
spelling doaj.art-29a44c97dd1949608bc628ea1d5622272022-12-22T04:32:34ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Genetics1664-80212022-09-011310.3389/fgene.2022.933534933534Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattleSarah Jane Appleby0Sarah Jane Appleby1Pavla Misica‐Turner2Fleur Catherine Oback3Arindam Dhali4Zachariah Louis McLean5Zachariah Louis McLean6Björn Oback7Björn Oback8Björn Oback9Animal Biotech, AgResearch, Hamilton, New ZealandSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandAnimal Biotech, AgResearch, Hamilton, New ZealandAnimal Biotech, AgResearch, Hamilton, New ZealandAnimal Biotech, AgResearch, Hamilton, New ZealandAnimal Biotech, AgResearch, Hamilton, New ZealandSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandAnimal Biotech, AgResearch, Hamilton, New ZealandSchool of Science, University of Waikato, Hamilton, New ZealandSchool of Medical Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New ZealandCloning multiple animals from genomically selected donor embryos is inefficient but would accelerate genetic gain in dairy cattle breeding. To improve embryo cloning efficiency, we explored the idea that epigenetic reprogramming improves when donor cells are in mitosis. We derived primary cultures from bovine inner cell mass (ICM) cells of in vitro fertilized (IVF) embryos. Cells were grown feeder-free in a chemically defined medium with increased double kinase inhibition (2i+). Adding recombinant bovine interleukin 6 to 2i+ medium improved plating efficiency, outgrowth expansion, and expression of pluripotency-associated epiblast marker genes (NANOG, FGF4, SOX2, and DPPA3). For genotype multiplication by embryonic cell transfer (ECT) cloning, primary colonies were treated with nocodazole, and single mitotic donors were harvested by mechanical shake-off. Immunofluorescence against phosphorylated histone 3 (P-H3) showed 37% of nocodazole-treated cells in metaphase compared to 6% in DMSO controls (P < 1 × 10−5), with an average of 53% of P-H3-positive cells expressing the pluripotency marker SOX2. We optimized several parameters (fusion buffer, pronase treatment, and activation timing) for ECT with mitotic embryonic donors. Sequential double cytoplast ECT, whereby another cytoplast was fused to the first cloned reconstruct, doubled cloned blastocyst development and improved morphological embryo quality. However, in situ karyotyping revealed that over 90% of mitotic ECT-derived blastocysts were tetraploid or aneuploid with extra chromosomes, compared to less than 2% in the original ICM donor cells. Following the transfer of single vs. double cytoplast embryos, there was no difference between the two methods in pregnancy establishment at D35 (1/22 = 5% vs. 4/53 = 8% for single vs. double ECT, respectively). Overall, post-implantation development was drastically reduced from embryonic mitotic clones when compared to somatic interphase clones and IVF controls. We conclude that mitotic donors cause ploidy errors during in vitro development that cannot be rescued by enhanced epigenetic reprogramming through double cytoplast cloning.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.933534/fullbovinecloningembryo (animal)pluripotentcell cyclemitotic
spellingShingle Sarah Jane Appleby
Sarah Jane Appleby
Pavla Misica‐Turner
Fleur Catherine Oback
Arindam Dhali
Zachariah Louis McLean
Zachariah Louis McLean
Björn Oback
Björn Oback
Björn Oback
Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
Frontiers in Genetics
bovine
cloning
embryo (animal)
pluripotent
cell cycle
mitotic
title Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
title_full Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
title_fullStr Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
title_full_unstemmed Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
title_short Double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
title_sort double cytoplast embryonic cloning improves in vitro but not in vivo development from mitotic pluripotent cells in cattle
topic bovine
cloning
embryo (animal)
pluripotent
cell cycle
mitotic
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fgene.2022.933534/full
work_keys_str_mv AT sarahjaneappleby doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT sarahjaneappleby doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT pavlamisicaturner doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT fleurcatherineoback doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT arindamdhali doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT zachariahlouismclean doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT zachariahlouismclean doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT bjornoback doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT bjornoback doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle
AT bjornoback doublecytoplastembryoniccloningimprovesinvitrobutnotinvivodevelopmentfrommitoticpluripotentcellsincattle