Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”

Peter J Weina,1 Sanjur Brooks2 1Department of Research Programs, Infectious Diseases Physician, WRNMMC and FBCH, Medicine and Preventive Medicine, USUHS, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Department of Research Programs, Walter Reed National Military...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weina PJ, Brooks S
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2017-10-01
Series:Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/httpsletter-wwwdovepresscomthe-use-of-the-psychiatric-elect-peer-reviewed-article-NDT
_version_ 1831774336405471232
author Weina PJ
Brooks S
author_facet Weina PJ
Brooks S
author_sort Weina PJ
collection DOAJ
description Peter J Weina,1 Sanjur Brooks2 1Department of Research Programs, Infectious Diseases Physician, WRNMMC and FBCH, Medicine and Preventive Medicine, USUHS, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Department of Research Programs, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA We read the paper of Iosifescu et al, “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”, with great apprehension. The authors’ description of the study’s limitations was gravely understated. Under the “Study limitations” section, the authors stated “The Walter Reed PEER Trial has certain limitations that should be kept in mind when interpreting the study findings”.1 However, the authors fail to address the study’s regulatory challenges and ethical concerns of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC).Authors' reply Dan V Iosifescu,1,2 Robert J Neborsky,3–5 Robert J Valuck6–81NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 2Clinical Research, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research Orangeburg, NY, USA; 3School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; 4University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 5Medical Corps, US Navy, USA; 6Pharmacy, Epidemiology, and Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA; 7Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA; 8Colorado Consortium for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention, Denver, CO, USA We welcome the opportunity to respond to the letter from Dr Weina and Mr Brooks regarding our paper “The use of the Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluation Register (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”, published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. We find the description of the events as portrayed in the letter to omit relevant information, and we welcome the opportunity to set the record straight. View the original paper by  Iosifescu DV and colleagues. 
first_indexed 2024-12-22T08:53:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29acc711ab40443eab4a699ebbb1fed8
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-2021
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-22T08:53:36Z
publishDate 2017-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
spelling doaj.art-29acc711ab40443eab4a699ebbb1fed82022-12-21T18:31:55ZengDove Medical PressNeuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment1178-20212017-10-01Volume 132527253035030Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”Weina PJBrooks SPeter J Weina,1 Sanjur Brooks2 1Department of Research Programs, Infectious Diseases Physician, WRNMMC and FBCH, Medicine and Preventive Medicine, USUHS, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA; 2Department of Research Programs, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Rockville Pike, Bethesda, MD, USA We read the paper of Iosifescu et al, “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”, with great apprehension. The authors’ description of the study’s limitations was gravely understated. Under the “Study limitations” section, the authors stated “The Walter Reed PEER Trial has certain limitations that should be kept in mind when interpreting the study findings”.1 However, the authors fail to address the study’s regulatory challenges and ethical concerns of the Institutional Review Board (IRB) at Walter Reed National Military Medical Center (WRNMMC).Authors' reply Dan V Iosifescu,1,2 Robert J Neborsky,3–5 Robert J Valuck6–81NYU School of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 2Clinical Research, Nathan Kline Institute for Psychiatric Research Orangeburg, NY, USA; 3School of Medicine, University of California, San Diego, CA, USA; 4University of California, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 5Medical Corps, US Navy, USA; 6Pharmacy, Epidemiology, and Family Medicine, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA; 7Center for Pharmaceutical Outcomes Research, University of Colorado, Denver, CO, USA; 8Colorado Consortium for Prescription Drug Abuse Prevention, Denver, CO, USA We welcome the opportunity to respond to the letter from Dr Weina and Mr Brooks regarding our paper “The use of the Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluation Register (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”, published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment. We find the description of the events as portrayed in the letter to omit relevant information, and we welcome the opportunity to set the record straight. View the original paper by  Iosifescu DV and colleagues. https://www.dovepress.com/httpsletter-wwwdovepresscomthe-use-of-the-psychiatric-elect-peer-reviewed-article-NDTPsychiatric Electroencephalography
spellingShingle Weina PJ
Brooks S
Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”
Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment
Psychiatric Electroencephalography
title Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”
title_full Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”
title_fullStr Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”
title_full_unstemmed Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”
title_short Letter to the editor regarding the article “The use of Psychiatric Electroencephalography Evaluations Registry (PEER) to personalize pharmacotherapy”
title_sort letter to the editor regarding the article ldquo the use of psychiatric electroencephalography evaluations registry peer to personalize pharmacotherapy rdquo
topic Psychiatric Electroencephalography
url https://www.dovepress.com/httpsletter-wwwdovepresscomthe-use-of-the-psychiatric-elect-peer-reviewed-article-NDT
work_keys_str_mv AT weinapj lettertotheeditorregardingthearticleldquotheuseofpsychiatricelectroencephalographyevaluationsregistrypeertopersonalizepharmacotherapyrdquo
AT brookss lettertotheeditorregardingthearticleldquotheuseofpsychiatricelectroencephalographyevaluationsregistrypeertopersonalizepharmacotherapyrdquo