Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark

The numerical simulation of lake–groundwater interaction dynamics is very challenging, and, thus, only few model codes are available. The present study investigated the performance of a new method, namely, the Sloping Lakebed Method (SLM), in comparison to the widely used MODFLOW lake package (LAK3)...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Chuiyu Lu, Xin He, Bo Zhang, Jianhua Wang, Jacob Kidmose, Jerker Jarsjö
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2022-09-01
Series:Water
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/19/3054
_version_ 1797476460829605888
author Chuiyu Lu
Xin He
Bo Zhang
Jianhua Wang
Jacob Kidmose
Jerker Jarsjö
author_facet Chuiyu Lu
Xin He
Bo Zhang
Jianhua Wang
Jacob Kidmose
Jerker Jarsjö
author_sort Chuiyu Lu
collection DOAJ
description The numerical simulation of lake–groundwater interaction dynamics is very challenging, and, thus, only few model codes are available. The present study investigated the performance of a new method, namely, the Sloping Lakebed Method (SLM), in comparison to the widely used MODFLOW lake package (LAK3). Coupled lake–groundwater models based on LAK3 and SLM were developed for Lake Hampen, Denmark. The results showed that both methods had essentially the same accuracy when simulating the lake water level, the groundwater head and the overall water balance. The SLM-based model had the potential to reproduce the change of the lake surface area in a more natural way. Moreover, the vertical discretization of a lake in the SLM is independent of the groundwater model, and, thus, the model grid at the top layers could be considerably coarsened without a loss of model accuracy. This could lead to savings in computational time of approximately 30%.
first_indexed 2024-03-09T20:58:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29b2148bc9ab48c3add551dee54cea75
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2073-4441
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-09T20:58:08Z
publishDate 2022-09-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Water
spelling doaj.art-29b2148bc9ab48c3add551dee54cea752023-11-23T22:15:01ZengMDPI AGWater2073-44412022-09-011419305410.3390/w14193054Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western DenmarkChuiyu Lu0Xin He1Bo Zhang2Jianhua Wang3Jacob Kidmose4Jerker Jarsjö5State Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycles in River Basins, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, ChinaDepartment of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, ChinaDepartment of Water Resources, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, ChinaState Key Laboratory of Simulation and Regulation of Water Cycles in River Basins, China Institute of Water Resources and Hydropower Research, Beijing 100038, ChinaDepartment of Hydrology, Geological Survey of Denmark and Greenland, 1350 Copenhagen, DenmarkDepartment of Physical Geography, Stockholm University, 10691 Stockholm, SwedenThe numerical simulation of lake–groundwater interaction dynamics is very challenging, and, thus, only few model codes are available. The present study investigated the performance of a new method, namely, the Sloping Lakebed Method (SLM), in comparison to the widely used MODFLOW lake package (LAK3). Coupled lake–groundwater models based on LAK3 and SLM were developed for Lake Hampen, Denmark. The results showed that both methods had essentially the same accuracy when simulating the lake water level, the groundwater head and the overall water balance. The SLM-based model had the potential to reproduce the change of the lake surface area in a more natural way. Moreover, the vertical discretization of a lake in the SLM is independent of the groundwater model, and, thus, the model grid at the top layers could be considerably coarsened without a loss of model accuracy. This could lead to savings in computational time of approximately 30%.https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/19/3054lake–groundwater interactionMODFLOWLAK3intercomparison study
spellingShingle Chuiyu Lu
Xin He
Bo Zhang
Jianhua Wang
Jacob Kidmose
Jerker Jarsjö
Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
Water
lake–groundwater interaction
MODFLOW
LAK3
intercomparison study
title Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
title_full Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
title_fullStr Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
title_short Comparison of Numerical Methods in Simulating Lake–Groundwater Interactions: Lake Hampen, Western Denmark
title_sort comparison of numerical methods in simulating lake groundwater interactions lake hampen western denmark
topic lake–groundwater interaction
MODFLOW
LAK3
intercomparison study
url https://www.mdpi.com/2073-4441/14/19/3054
work_keys_str_mv AT chuiyulu comparisonofnumericalmethodsinsimulatinglakegroundwaterinteractionslakehampenwesterndenmark
AT xinhe comparisonofnumericalmethodsinsimulatinglakegroundwaterinteractionslakehampenwesterndenmark
AT bozhang comparisonofnumericalmethodsinsimulatinglakegroundwaterinteractionslakehampenwesterndenmark
AT jianhuawang comparisonofnumericalmethodsinsimulatinglakegroundwaterinteractionslakehampenwesterndenmark
AT jacobkidmose comparisonofnumericalmethodsinsimulatinglakegroundwaterinteractionslakehampenwesterndenmark
AT jerkerjarsjo comparisonofnumericalmethodsinsimulatinglakegroundwaterinteractionslakehampenwesterndenmark