Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators

Under EU law, EU citizens constitute a particular group of immigrants, as they can, mostly without restrictions, move to, and reside in, another EU country, enjoying equal treatment with nationals in terms of accessing employment and social rights. However, as this article demonstrates, the settleme...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Nora Ratzmann, Anita Heindlmaier
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Cogitatio 2022-03-01
Series:Social Inclusion
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4642
_version_ 1818016806177079296
author Nora Ratzmann
Anita Heindlmaier
author_facet Nora Ratzmann
Anita Heindlmaier
author_sort Nora Ratzmann
collection DOAJ
description Under EU law, EU citizens constitute a particular group of immigrants, as they can, mostly without restrictions, move to, and reside in, another EU country, enjoying equal treatment with nationals in terms of accessing employment and social rights. However, as this article demonstrates, the settlement of EU citizens in another member state does not happen without hurdles. Through a careful in‐depth study of access to transnational welfare rights in practice, we analyse knowledge and resulting power asymmetries impacting interactions between certain EU migrant claimants and street‐level bureaucrats in Austrian and German social administrations. Following an inductive approach, based on an extensive data set of 144 qualitative interviews, this article first unpacks the different types of knowledge asymmetries relating to administrative procedures, formal social entitlements and the German language. We then analyse how such knowledge asymmetries may open space for welfare mediation in order to compensate for a lack of German language skills and to clarify misunderstandings about legal entitlements and obligations embedded in the claims system. Finally, our contribution offers a typology of welfare mediators and their characteristics, as not all types can be regarded as equally effective in reshaping power asymmetries. Overall, this article allows for insights into how welfare mediators, as more or less institutionalised opportunity structures, can shift policy outcomes in unexpected ways, enabling access to social benefits and services for otherwise excluded EU migrant citizens working, or seeking to work, in another EU member state.
first_indexed 2024-04-14T07:18:30Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29b269fee18a427fbbf3689ff1431bf5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2183-2803
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-14T07:18:30Z
publishDate 2022-03-01
publisher Cogitatio
record_format Article
series Social Inclusion
spelling doaj.art-29b269fee18a427fbbf3689ff1431bf52022-12-22T02:06:14ZengCogitatioSocial Inclusion2183-28032022-03-0110120521610.17645/si.v9i4.46422348Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare AdministratorsNora Ratzmann0Anita Heindlmaier1Centre for Analysis of Social Exclusion, London School of Economics, UKSalzburg Centre of European Union Studies, University of Salzburg, Austria / Department of Political Science and Sociology, University of Salzburg, AustriaUnder EU law, EU citizens constitute a particular group of immigrants, as they can, mostly without restrictions, move to, and reside in, another EU country, enjoying equal treatment with nationals in terms of accessing employment and social rights. However, as this article demonstrates, the settlement of EU citizens in another member state does not happen without hurdles. Through a careful in‐depth study of access to transnational welfare rights in practice, we analyse knowledge and resulting power asymmetries impacting interactions between certain EU migrant claimants and street‐level bureaucrats in Austrian and German social administrations. Following an inductive approach, based on an extensive data set of 144 qualitative interviews, this article first unpacks the different types of knowledge asymmetries relating to administrative procedures, formal social entitlements and the German language. We then analyse how such knowledge asymmetries may open space for welfare mediation in order to compensate for a lack of German language skills and to clarify misunderstandings about legal entitlements and obligations embedded in the claims system. Finally, our contribution offers a typology of welfare mediators and their characteristics, as not all types can be regarded as equally effective in reshaping power asymmetries. Overall, this article allows for insights into how welfare mediators, as more or less institutionalised opportunity structures, can shift policy outcomes in unexpected ways, enabling access to social benefits and services for otherwise excluded EU migrant citizens working, or seeking to work, in another EU member state.https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4642european unionfree movementmigrationnon‐take‐upsocial assistance benefitsstreet‐level bureaucracywelfare mediators
spellingShingle Nora Ratzmann
Anita Heindlmaier
Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators
Social Inclusion
european union
free movement
migration
non‐take‐up
social assistance benefits
street‐level bureaucracy
welfare mediators
title Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators
title_full Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators
title_fullStr Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators
title_full_unstemmed Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators
title_short Welfare Mediators as Game Changers? Deconstructing Power Asymmetries Between EU Migrants and Welfare Administrators
title_sort welfare mediators as game changers deconstructing power asymmetries between eu migrants and welfare administrators
topic european union
free movement
migration
non‐take‐up
social assistance benefits
street‐level bureaucracy
welfare mediators
url https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/4642
work_keys_str_mv AT noraratzmann welfaremediatorsasgamechangersdeconstructingpowerasymmetriesbetweeneumigrantsandwelfareadministrators
AT anitaheindlmaier welfaremediatorsasgamechangersdeconstructingpowerasymmetriesbetweeneumigrantsandwelfareadministrators