Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges

The Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocol is the most important part of any network, and is considered to be a fundamental protocol that aids in enhancing the performance of networks and communications. However, the MAC protocol’s design for underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) has introduced var...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Faisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-07-01
Series:Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/741
_version_ 1797526774196731904
author Faisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan
author_facet Faisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan
author_sort Faisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan
collection DOAJ
description The Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocol is the most important part of any network, and is considered to be a fundamental protocol that aids in enhancing the performance of networks and communications. However, the MAC protocol’s design for underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) has introduced various challenges. This is due to long underwater acoustic propagation delay, high mobility, low available bandwidth, and high error probability. These unique acoustic channel characteristics make contention-based MAC protocols significantly more expensive than other protocol contentions. Therefore, re-transmission and collisions should effectively be managed at the MAC layer to decrease the energy cost and to enhance the network’s throughput. Consequently, handshake-based and random access-based MAC protocols do not perform as efficiently as their achieved performance in terrestrial networks. To tackle this complicated problem, this paper surveys the current collision-free MAC protocols proposed in the literature for UWSNs. We first review the unique characteristic of underwater sensor networks and its negative impact on the MAC layer. It is then followed by a discussion about the problem definition, challenges, and features associated with the design of MAC protocols in UWANs. Afterwards, currently available collision-free MAC design strategies in UWSNs are classified and investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of each design strategy along with the recent advances are then presented. Finally, we present a qualitative comparison of these strategies and also discuss some possible future directions.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T09:35:06Z
format Article
id doaj.art-29be5b5a19f34bbabc18f878affae84a
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2077-1312
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T09:35:06Z
publishDate 2021-07-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
spelling doaj.art-29be5b5a19f34bbabc18f878affae84a2023-11-22T04:08:59ZengMDPI AGJournal of Marine Science and Engineering2077-13122021-07-019774110.3390/jmse9070741Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and ChallengesFaisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan0Department of Forensic Sciences, College of Criminal Justice, Naif Arab University for Security Sciences (NAUSS), Riyadh 14812, Saudi ArabiaThe Medium Access Control (MAC) layer protocol is the most important part of any network, and is considered to be a fundamental protocol that aids in enhancing the performance of networks and communications. However, the MAC protocol’s design for underwater sensor networks (UWSNs) has introduced various challenges. This is due to long underwater acoustic propagation delay, high mobility, low available bandwidth, and high error probability. These unique acoustic channel characteristics make contention-based MAC protocols significantly more expensive than other protocol contentions. Therefore, re-transmission and collisions should effectively be managed at the MAC layer to decrease the energy cost and to enhance the network’s throughput. Consequently, handshake-based and random access-based MAC protocols do not perform as efficiently as their achieved performance in terrestrial networks. To tackle this complicated problem, this paper surveys the current collision-free MAC protocols proposed in the literature for UWSNs. We first review the unique characteristic of underwater sensor networks and its negative impact on the MAC layer. It is then followed by a discussion about the problem definition, challenges, and features associated with the design of MAC protocols in UWANs. Afterwards, currently available collision-free MAC design strategies in UWSNs are classified and investigated. The advantages and disadvantages of each design strategy along with the recent advances are then presented. Finally, we present a qualitative comparison of these strategies and also discuss some possible future directions.https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/741underwater sensor networksmedium access controlcontention-free MAC protocols
spellingShingle Faisal Abdulaziz Alfouzan
Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges
Journal of Marine Science and Engineering
underwater sensor networks
medium access control
contention-free MAC protocols
title Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges
title_full Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges
title_fullStr Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges
title_full_unstemmed Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges
title_short Energy-Efficient Collision Avoidance MAC Protocols for Underwater Sensor Networks: Survey and Challenges
title_sort energy efficient collision avoidance mac protocols for underwater sensor networks survey and challenges
topic underwater sensor networks
medium access control
contention-free MAC protocols
url https://www.mdpi.com/2077-1312/9/7/741
work_keys_str_mv AT faisalabdulazizalfouzan energyefficientcollisionavoidancemacprotocolsforunderwatersensornetworkssurveyandchallenges