'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment
(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(3), 1359-1369 | European Forum Insight of 27 January 2021 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Background. - III. The rationale for Rosneft. - IV. The approach in Bank Refah. - V. Art. 215 TFEU as the legal basis...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)
2021-01-01
|
| Series: | European Papers |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/restrictive-measures-under-art-215-tfeu-bank-refah-brief-reflections |
| _version_ | 1819060878694154240 |
|---|---|
| author | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni |
| author_facet | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni |
| author_sort | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | (Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(3), 1359-1369 | European Forum Insight of 27 January 2021 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Background. - III. The rationale for Rosneft. - IV. The approach in Bank Refah. - V. Art. 215 TFEU as the legal basis of a legal sub-system. - VI. Is there a unitary normative paradigm in the area of restrictive measures? - VII. Concluding remarks. | (Abstract) In Bank Refah (judgment of 6 October 2020, case C-134/19 P) the Court of Justice provides important clarifications on the type of judicial remedies available in relation to CFSP decisions establishing restrictive measures. As in Rosneft, the Court seems to extend its jurisdiction beyond the so-called "claw-back" provision of Art. 275, para. 2, TFEU. However, in Bank Refah the Court of Justice does not build upon the logic developed in Rosneft, but it takes a different approach. This Insight focuses on the line of argument used by the Court and seeks to identify its implication for the post-Lisbon framework of relations between CFSP and other EU policies. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-21T14:33:59Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-29cde0dba427439a9643508d501a50e2 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2499-8249 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-21T14:33:59Z |
| publishDate | 2021-01-01 |
| publisher | European Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | European Papers |
| spelling | doaj.art-29cde0dba427439a9643508d501a50e22022-12-21T19:00:22ZengEuropean Papers (www.europeanpapers.eu)European Papers2499-82492021-01-012020 531359136910.15166/2499-8249/442'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah JudgmentMaria Eugenia Bartoloni0University of Campania 'L. Vanvitelli'(Series Information) European Papers - A Journal on Law and Integration, 2020 5(3), 1359-1369 | European Forum Insight of 27 January 2021 | (Table of Contents) I. Introduction. - II. Background. - III. The rationale for Rosneft. - IV. The approach in Bank Refah. - V. Art. 215 TFEU as the legal basis of a legal sub-system. - VI. Is there a unitary normative paradigm in the area of restrictive measures? - VII. Concluding remarks. | (Abstract) In Bank Refah (judgment of 6 October 2020, case C-134/19 P) the Court of Justice provides important clarifications on the type of judicial remedies available in relation to CFSP decisions establishing restrictive measures. As in Rosneft, the Court seems to extend its jurisdiction beyond the so-called "claw-back" provision of Art. 275, para. 2, TFEU. However, in Bank Refah the Court of Justice does not build upon the logic developed in Rosneft, but it takes a different approach. This Insight focuses on the line of argument used by the Court and seeks to identify its implication for the post-Lisbon framework of relations between CFSP and other EU policies.https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/restrictive-measures-under-art-215-tfeu-bank-refah-brief-reflectionsart. 215 tfeuart. 275, para. 2, tfeurestrictive measuresaction for damagescfspjudicial protection |
| spellingShingle | Maria Eugenia Bartoloni 'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment European Papers art. 215 tfeu art. 275, para. 2, tfeu restrictive measures action for damages cfsp judicial protection |
| title | 'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment |
| title_full | 'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment |
| title_fullStr | 'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment |
| title_full_unstemmed | 'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment |
| title_short | 'Restrictive Measures' Under Art. 215 TFEU: Towards a Unitary Legal Regime? Brief Reflections on the Bank Refah Judgment |
| title_sort | restrictive measures under art 215 tfeu towards a unitary legal regime brief reflections on the bank refah judgment |
| topic | art. 215 tfeu art. 275, para. 2, tfeu restrictive measures action for damages cfsp judicial protection |
| url | https://www.europeanpapers.eu/en/europeanforum/restrictive-measures-under-art-215-tfeu-bank-refah-brief-reflections |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT mariaeugeniabartoloni restrictivemeasuresunderart215tfeutowardsaunitarylegalregimebriefreflectionsonthebankrefahjudgment |