Judging Expert Testimony: From Verbal Formalism to Practical Advice
Appraising the worth of others’ testimony is always complex; appraising the worth of expert testimony is even harder; appraising the worth of expert testimony in a legal context is harder yet. Legal efforts to assess the reliability of expert testimony—I’ll focus on evolving U.S. law governing the a...
Main Author: | Susan Haack |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Marcial Pons
2020-01-01
|
Series: | Quaestio Facti |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://revistes.udg.edu/quaestio-facti/article/view/22312 |
Similar Items
-
The Expert Witness: Lessons from the U.S. Experience
by: Susan Haack
Published: (2015-05-01) -
THE CIENTIFIC EVIDENCE
by: Adrian Simons Pino
Published: (2017-12-01) -
Effects of false-evidence ploys and expert testimony on jurors, juries, and judges
by: William Douglas Woody, et al.
Published: (2018-12-01) -
Providing expert medical testimony
by: Bajić-Milosavljević Aleksandra, et al.
Published: (2005-01-01) -
Robust Trust in Expert Testimony
by: Christian Dahlman, et al.
Published: (2015-05-01)