Writing in Mind
According to the “extended mind” thesis, a significant portion of human cog-nition does not occur solely inside the head, but literally extends beyond the brain into the body and the world around us (Clark & Chalmers 1998; Clark 2003, 2008; Wilson 1995, 2004; Rowlands 1999, 2010; Menary 2007, 20...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Maria Curie-Sklodowska University
2013-09-01
|
| Series: | Avant |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/G-Theiner-Writing-in-Mind.pdf |
| _version_ | 1797426091009245184 |
|---|---|
| author | Georg Theiner |
| author_facet | Georg Theiner |
| author_sort | Georg Theiner |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | According to the “extended mind” thesis, a significant portion of human cog-nition does not occur solely inside the head, but literally extends beyond the brain into the body and the world around us (Clark & Chalmers 1998; Clark 2003, 2008; Wilson 1995, 2004; Rowlands 1999, 2010; Menary 2007, 2012; Sutton 2010; Theiner 2011). One way to understand this thesis is that as human beings, we are particularly adept at creating and recruiting environmental props and scaffolds (media, tools, artifacts, symbol systems) for the purpose of solving problems that would otherwise lie beyond our cognitive reach. We manipulate, scaffold, and re-design our environments in ways that transform the nature of difficult tasks that would baffle our unaided biological brains (e.g., math, logic, sequential problem-solving) into simpler types of problems that we are naturally much better equipped to solve. A central tenet of the “extended mind” thesis, then, is that “much of what matters for human-level intelligence is hidden not in the brain, nor in the technology, but in the complex and iterated interactions and collaborations between the two” (Clark 2001: 154). Over the past fifteen years or so, the “extended mind” thesis has become a hot ticket in the philosophy of mind. As with all great ideas, the thesis was hardly conceived ex nihilo, but builds on, and re-articulates many earlier strands of thought. Unfortunately, many of those cognate strands have become marginalized in contemporary philosophy of mind and psychology, and do not receive the amount of attention they deserve. Part of what we hope to accomplish with this special issue is to reverse this trend, and to rekindle the dialogue between the “extended mind” thesis and its historical predecessors. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:25:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-29fd01c97b9b415291c525a0fa74210d |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2082-6710 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-09T08:25:20Z |
| publishDate | 2013-09-01 |
| publisher | Maria Curie-Sklodowska University |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Avant |
| spelling | doaj.art-29fd01c97b9b415291c525a0fa74210d2023-12-02T21:17:41ZengMaria Curie-Sklodowska UniversityAvant2082-67102013-09-01IV2/20131529Writing in MindGeorg Theiner0Villanova UniversityAccording to the “extended mind” thesis, a significant portion of human cog-nition does not occur solely inside the head, but literally extends beyond the brain into the body and the world around us (Clark & Chalmers 1998; Clark 2003, 2008; Wilson 1995, 2004; Rowlands 1999, 2010; Menary 2007, 2012; Sutton 2010; Theiner 2011). One way to understand this thesis is that as human beings, we are particularly adept at creating and recruiting environmental props and scaffolds (media, tools, artifacts, symbol systems) for the purpose of solving problems that would otherwise lie beyond our cognitive reach. We manipulate, scaffold, and re-design our environments in ways that transform the nature of difficult tasks that would baffle our unaided biological brains (e.g., math, logic, sequential problem-solving) into simpler types of problems that we are naturally much better equipped to solve. A central tenet of the “extended mind” thesis, then, is that “much of what matters for human-level intelligence is hidden not in the brain, nor in the technology, but in the complex and iterated interactions and collaborations between the two” (Clark 2001: 154). Over the past fifteen years or so, the “extended mind” thesis has become a hot ticket in the philosophy of mind. As with all great ideas, the thesis was hardly conceived ex nihilo, but builds on, and re-articulates many earlier strands of thought. Unfortunately, many of those cognate strands have become marginalized in contemporary philosophy of mind and psychology, and do not receive the amount of attention they deserve. Part of what we hope to accomplish with this special issue is to reverse this trend, and to rekindle the dialogue between the “extended mind” thesis and its historical predecessors.http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/G-Theiner-Writing-in-Mind.pdfextended mindcognitive sciencelanguageliteracymedia |
| spellingShingle | Georg Theiner Writing in Mind Avant extended mind cognitive science language literacy media |
| title | Writing in Mind |
| title_full | Writing in Mind |
| title_fullStr | Writing in Mind |
| title_full_unstemmed | Writing in Mind |
| title_short | Writing in Mind |
| title_sort | writing in mind |
| topic | extended mind cognitive science language literacy media |
| url | http://avant.edu.pl/wp-content/uploads/G-Theiner-Writing-in-Mind.pdf |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT georgtheiner writinginmind |