Patient Prosthesis Mismatch in SAVR: How Avoidable is It in the ‘Real World’?
We set out to assess whether the preoperative prediction of patient-prosthesis mismatch by an algorithm popularised by Pibarot et al. is accurate compared to PPMM defined as AVA <0.85 cm2/m2 (‘any PPMM’) or as AVA <0.65cm2/m2 (‘severe’ PPMM).
Main Authors: | Mushtaq Amir, Ali Montasir H, Ionescu Adrian |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Sciendo
2022-12-01
|
Series: | Romanian Journal of Cardiology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.2478/rjc-2022-0033 |
Similar Items
-
Patient Prosthesis Mismatch After SAVR and TAVR
by: Sabine Bleiziffer, et al.
Published: (2022-03-01) -
Perceval or Trifecta to Prevent Patient–Prosthesis Mismatch
by: Daniel Hernandez-Vaquero, et al.
Published: (2020-09-01) -
Early outcome of aortic valve replacement with mechanical prosthesis in patients with aortic stenosis. Is patient-prosthesis mismatch a significant clinical problem?
by: Sławomir Jander, et al.
Published: (2007-03-01) -
The Prognostic Significance of Patient-Prosthesis Mismatch after Aortic Valve Replacement
by: Paolo Nardi, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01) -
Prosthesis-Patient mismatch after aortic valve replacement: A single-center experience
by: Sedigheh Saedi, et al.
Published: (2018-01-01)