Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction

Abstract Aims No biomarker has achieved widespread acceptance as a surrogate endpoint for early‐phase heart failure (HF) trials. We assessed whether changes over time in a panel of plasma biomarkers were associated with subsequent morbidity/mortality in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Met...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Gianluigi Savarese, Alicia Uijl, Wouter Ouwerkerk, Jasper Tromp, Stefan D. Anker, Kenneth Dickstein, Camilla Hage, Carolyn S.P. Lam, Chim C. Lang, Marco Metra, Leong L. Ng, Nicola Orsini, Nilesh J. Samani, Dirk J. vanVeldhuisen, John G.F. Cleland, Adriaan A. Voors, Lars H. Lund
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-08-01
Series:ESC Heart Failure
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13917
_version_ 1818197077035843584
author Gianluigi Savarese
Alicia Uijl
Wouter Ouwerkerk
Jasper Tromp
Stefan D. Anker
Kenneth Dickstein
Camilla Hage
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Chim C. Lang
Marco Metra
Leong L. Ng
Nicola Orsini
Nilesh J. Samani
Dirk J. vanVeldhuisen
John G.F. Cleland
Adriaan A. Voors
Lars H. Lund
author_facet Gianluigi Savarese
Alicia Uijl
Wouter Ouwerkerk
Jasper Tromp
Stefan D. Anker
Kenneth Dickstein
Camilla Hage
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Chim C. Lang
Marco Metra
Leong L. Ng
Nicola Orsini
Nilesh J. Samani
Dirk J. vanVeldhuisen
John G.F. Cleland
Adriaan A. Voors
Lars H. Lund
author_sort Gianluigi Savarese
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Aims No biomarker has achieved widespread acceptance as a surrogate endpoint for early‐phase heart failure (HF) trials. We assessed whether changes over time in a panel of plasma biomarkers were associated with subsequent morbidity/mortality in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results In 1040 patients with HFrEF from the BIOSTAT‐CHF cohort, we investigated the associations between changes in the plasma concentrations of 30 biomarkers, before (baseline) and after (9 months) attempted optimization of guideline‐recommended therapy, on top of the BIOSTAT risk score and the subsequent risk of HF hospitalization/all‐cause mortality using Cox regression models. C‐statistics were calculated to assess discriminatory power of biomarker changes/month‐nine assessment. Changes in N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) and WAP four‐disulphide core domain protein HE4 (WAP‐4C) were the only independent predictors of the outcome after adjusting for their baseline plasma concentration, 28 other biomarkers (both baseline and changes), and BIOSTAT risk score at baseline. When adjusting for month‐nine rather than baseline biomarkers concentrations, only changes in NT‐proBNP were independently associated with the outcome. The C‐statistic of the model including the BIOSTAT risk score and NT‐proBNP increased by 4% when changes were considered on top of baseline concentrations and by 1% when changes in NT‐proBNP were considered on top of its month‐nine concentrations and the BIOSTAT risk score. Conclusions Among 30 relevant biomarkers, a change over time was significantly and independently associated with HF hospitalization/all‐cause death only for NT‐proBNP. Changes over time were modestly more prognostic than baseline or end‐values alone. Changes in biomarkers should be further explored as potential surrogate endpoints in early phase HF trials.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T01:44:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a10c1e7c4934e62b1a56f214be0a7f7
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2055-5822
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T01:44:14Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series ESC Heart Failure
spelling doaj.art-2a10c1e7c4934e62b1a56f214be0a7f72022-12-22T00:42:37ZengWileyESC Heart Failure2055-58222022-08-01942107211810.1002/ehf2.13917Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fractionGianluigi Savarese0Alicia Uijl1Wouter Ouwerkerk2Jasper Tromp3Stefan D. Anker4Kenneth Dickstein5Camilla Hage6Carolyn S.P. Lam7Chim C. Lang8Marco Metra9Leong L. Ng10Nicola Orsini11Nilesh J. Samani12Dirk J. vanVeldhuisen13John G.F. Cleland14Adriaan A. Voors15Lars H. Lund16Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenNational Heart Centre Singapore SingaporeNational Heart Centre Singapore SingaporeDepartment of Cardiology (CVK); and Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies (BCRT); German Centre for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK) partner site Berlin Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Berlin GermanyStavanger University Hospital Stavanger NorwayDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenNational Heart Centre Singapore SingaporeDivision of Molecular and Clinical Medicine University of Dundee Dundee UKCardiology Unit, ASST Spedali Civili and Department of Medical and Surgical Specialties, Radiological Sciences and Public Health University of Brescia Brescia ItalyDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre Leicester UKDepartment of Global Public Health Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenDepartment of Cardiovascular Sciences University of Leicester, Glenfield Hospital, and NIHR Leicester Biomedical Research Centre Leicester UKDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The NetherlandsRobertson Centre for Biostatistics, Institute of Health and Wellbeing, University of Glasgow, Glasgow and National Heart & Lung Institute Imperial College London UKDepartment of Cardiology, University Medical Center Groningen University of Groningen Groningen The NetherlandsDivision of Cardiology, Department of Medicine Karolinska Institutet Stockholm SwedenAbstract Aims No biomarker has achieved widespread acceptance as a surrogate endpoint for early‐phase heart failure (HF) trials. We assessed whether changes over time in a panel of plasma biomarkers were associated with subsequent morbidity/mortality in HF with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods and results In 1040 patients with HFrEF from the BIOSTAT‐CHF cohort, we investigated the associations between changes in the plasma concentrations of 30 biomarkers, before (baseline) and after (9 months) attempted optimization of guideline‐recommended therapy, on top of the BIOSTAT risk score and the subsequent risk of HF hospitalization/all‐cause mortality using Cox regression models. C‐statistics were calculated to assess discriminatory power of biomarker changes/month‐nine assessment. Changes in N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide (NT‐proBNP) and WAP four‐disulphide core domain protein HE4 (WAP‐4C) were the only independent predictors of the outcome after adjusting for their baseline plasma concentration, 28 other biomarkers (both baseline and changes), and BIOSTAT risk score at baseline. When adjusting for month‐nine rather than baseline biomarkers concentrations, only changes in NT‐proBNP were independently associated with the outcome. The C‐statistic of the model including the BIOSTAT risk score and NT‐proBNP increased by 4% when changes were considered on top of baseline concentrations and by 1% when changes in NT‐proBNP were considered on top of its month‐nine concentrations and the BIOSTAT risk score. Conclusions Among 30 relevant biomarkers, a change over time was significantly and independently associated with HF hospitalization/all‐cause death only for NT‐proBNP. Changes over time were modestly more prognostic than baseline or end‐values alone. Changes in biomarkers should be further explored as potential surrogate endpoints in early phase HF trials.https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13917BiomarkersSurrogate endpointSurrogate outcomeHeart failure with reduced ejection fractionPhase 2Randomized trial
spellingShingle Gianluigi Savarese
Alicia Uijl
Wouter Ouwerkerk
Jasper Tromp
Stefan D. Anker
Kenneth Dickstein
Camilla Hage
Carolyn S.P. Lam
Chim C. Lang
Marco Metra
Leong L. Ng
Nicola Orsini
Nilesh J. Samani
Dirk J. vanVeldhuisen
John G.F. Cleland
Adriaan A. Voors
Lars H. Lund
Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
ESC Heart Failure
Biomarkers
Surrogate endpoint
Surrogate outcome
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Phase 2
Randomized trial
title Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_full Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_fullStr Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_full_unstemmed Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_short Biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early‐phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
title_sort biomarker changes as surrogate endpoints in early phase trials in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
topic Biomarkers
Surrogate endpoint
Surrogate outcome
Heart failure with reduced ejection fraction
Phase 2
Randomized trial
url https://doi.org/10.1002/ehf2.13917
work_keys_str_mv AT gianluigisavarese biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT aliciauijl biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT wouterouwerkerk biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT jaspertromp biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT stefandanker biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT kennethdickstein biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT camillahage biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT carolynsplam biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT chimclang biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT marcometra biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT leonglng biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT nicolaorsini biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT nileshjsamani biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT dirkjvanveldhuisen biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT johngfcleland biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT adriaanavoors biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction
AT larshlund biomarkerchangesassurrogateendpointsinearlyphasetrialsinheartfailurewithreducedejectionfraction