EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION

The conclusion of contracts between investors and host States is a common feature in international investment law. In many disputes, such investment agreements play a major role. The existence of such contractual agreements and the claims arising in the investment disputes surrounding them, have gi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: USM ADMIN
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Moldova State University 2019-08-01
Series:Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
Online Access:https://ojs.studiamsu.md/index.php/stiinte_sociale/article/view/5297
_version_ 1797837287732543488
author USM ADMIN
author_facet USM ADMIN
author_sort USM ADMIN
collection DOAJ
description The conclusion of contracts between investors and host States is a common feature in international investment law. In many disputes, such investment agreements play a major role. The existence of such contractual agreements and the claims arising in the investment disputes surrounding them, have given rise to a plethora of legal issues, which will be addressed in this contribution. Initially, it is necessary to distinguish between breaches of a treaty and breaches of contract. Not every breach of a contract by a State amounts to a breach of international law. There is a large body of case law setting out the line at which a breach of contract under domestic law amounts also to a breach of international law. This can either be due to the specific circumstances of the breach or to the existence of an umbrella clause. Cases involving breaches of contract invariably also have given rise to complex disputes about the jurisdiction of the treaty-based tribunal deciding on them. The main questions have focused on whether such tribunals can hear claims based on the breach of a contract as a preliminary question to determining a breach of a treaty, the jurisdiction of treaty-based tribunals to hear claims for the breach of contracts not amounting to breaches of international law and the relevance of contractually agreed dispute resolution provisions. None of the above questions have yet produced uniform answers. There are, however, certain approaches depending whether the applicable investment treaty provide for an “umbrella clause”, or the investment treaty has a limited rationae materie scope of protection. These aspects will be discussed in this article. Keywords: investment protection, contract claims, observance of investment undertakings, investment arbitration, scope of protection.
first_indexed 2024-04-09T15:23:20Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a1905cee83243c9af0b2bd7adb92d6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1814-3199
2345-1017
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-09T15:23:20Z
publishDate 2019-08-01
publisher Moldova State University
record_format Article
series Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
spelling doaj.art-2a1905cee83243c9af0b2bd7adb92d6e2023-04-28T23:17:11ZengMoldova State UniversityStudia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale1814-31992345-10172019-08-018EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATIONUSM ADMIN The conclusion of contracts between investors and host States is a common feature in international investment law. In many disputes, such investment agreements play a major role. The existence of such contractual agreements and the claims arising in the investment disputes surrounding them, have given rise to a plethora of legal issues, which will be addressed in this contribution. Initially, it is necessary to distinguish between breaches of a treaty and breaches of contract. Not every breach of a contract by a State amounts to a breach of international law. There is a large body of case law setting out the line at which a breach of contract under domestic law amounts also to a breach of international law. This can either be due to the specific circumstances of the breach or to the existence of an umbrella clause. Cases involving breaches of contract invariably also have given rise to complex disputes about the jurisdiction of the treaty-based tribunal deciding on them. The main questions have focused on whether such tribunals can hear claims based on the breach of a contract as a preliminary question to determining a breach of a treaty, the jurisdiction of treaty-based tribunals to hear claims for the breach of contracts not amounting to breaches of international law and the relevance of contractually agreed dispute resolution provisions. None of the above questions have yet produced uniform answers. There are, however, certain approaches depending whether the applicable investment treaty provide for an “umbrella clause”, or the investment treaty has a limited rationae materie scope of protection. These aspects will be discussed in this article. Keywords: investment protection, contract claims, observance of investment undertakings, investment arbitration, scope of protection. https://ojs.studiamsu.md/index.php/stiinte_sociale/article/view/5297
spellingShingle USM ADMIN
EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
Studia Universitatis Moldaviae: Stiinte Sociale
title EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
title_full EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
title_fullStr EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
title_full_unstemmed EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
title_short EFFECT OF FORUM SELECTION CLAUSES IN INVESTMENT ARBITRATION
title_sort effect of forum selection clauses in investment arbitration
url https://ojs.studiamsu.md/index.php/stiinte_sociale/article/view/5297
work_keys_str_mv AT usmadmin effectofforumselectionclausesininvestmentarbitration