Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids

Background: Adverse cardiovascular events have been reported in body builders taking anabolic steroids. Adverse effects of AAS on endothelial function can initiate atherosclerosis. This study evaluates endothelial function in body builders using AAS, compared with non-steroids using athletes as cont...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: H Hashemi, F Bayat, R Heidari, R Basiratnia, Y Kiyani
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications 2005-11-01
Series:Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
Online Access:http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/45
_version_ 1818936698544848896
author H Hashemi
F Bayat
R Heidari
R Basiratnia
Y Kiyani
author_facet H Hashemi
F Bayat
R Heidari
R Basiratnia
Y Kiyani
author_sort H Hashemi
collection DOAJ
description Background: Adverse cardiovascular events have been reported in body builders taking anabolic steroids. Adverse effects of AAS on endothelial function can initiate atherosclerosis. This study evaluates endothelial function in body builders using AAS, compared with non-steroids using athletes as controls.
 Methods: We recruited 30 nonsmoking male body builders taking AAS, 14 in build up phase, 8 in work out phase, and 8 in post steroid phase, and 30 nonsmoking male athletes who denied ever using steroids. Serum lipids and fasting plasma glucose were measured to exclude dyslipidemia and diabetes. Brachial artery diameter was measured by ultrasound at rest, after cuff inflation, and after sublingual glyceriltrinitrate (GTN) to determine flow mediated dilation (FMD), nitro mediated dilation (NMD) and ratio of FMD to NMD (index of endothelial function).
 Result: Use of AAS was associated with higher body mass index (BMI) and low density lipoprotein–cholesterol (LDL-C). Mean ratio of flow mediated dilatation after cuff deflation to post GTN dilatation of brachial artery (index of endothelial function) in body builders taking AAS was significantly lower than control group (0.96(0.05) versus 1(0.08); p=0.03). After adjusting BMI, age and weight, no significant difference was seen in index of endothelial function between two groups (p=0 .21).
 Conclusion: Our study indicates that taking AAS in body builders doesn’t have direct effect on endothelial function. Future study with bigger sample size and measurement of AAS metabolites is recommended.
 Key words: endothelium, lipids, anabolic steroids, body builders
first_indexed 2024-12-20T05:40:12Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a26f9e45e7b4ae8accb942b1cc2ca8d
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1735-1995
1735-7136
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-20T05:40:12Z
publishDate 2005-11-01
publisher Wolters Kluwer Medknow Publications
record_format Article
series Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
spelling doaj.art-2a26f9e45e7b4ae8accb942b1cc2ca8d2022-12-21T19:51:29ZengWolters Kluwer Medknow PublicationsJournal of Research in Medical Sciences1735-19951735-71362005-11-01106371376Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroidsH HashemiF BayatR HeidariR BasiratniaY KiyaniBackground: Adverse cardiovascular events have been reported in body builders taking anabolic steroids. Adverse effects of AAS on endothelial function can initiate atherosclerosis. This study evaluates endothelial function in body builders using AAS, compared with non-steroids using athletes as controls.
 Methods: We recruited 30 nonsmoking male body builders taking AAS, 14 in build up phase, 8 in work out phase, and 8 in post steroid phase, and 30 nonsmoking male athletes who denied ever using steroids. Serum lipids and fasting plasma glucose were measured to exclude dyslipidemia and diabetes. Brachial artery diameter was measured by ultrasound at rest, after cuff inflation, and after sublingual glyceriltrinitrate (GTN) to determine flow mediated dilation (FMD), nitro mediated dilation (NMD) and ratio of FMD to NMD (index of endothelial function).
 Result: Use of AAS was associated with higher body mass index (BMI) and low density lipoprotein–cholesterol (LDL-C). Mean ratio of flow mediated dilatation after cuff deflation to post GTN dilatation of brachial artery (index of endothelial function) in body builders taking AAS was significantly lower than control group (0.96(0.05) versus 1(0.08); p=0.03). After adjusting BMI, age and weight, no significant difference was seen in index of endothelial function between two groups (p=0 .21).
 Conclusion: Our study indicates that taking AAS in body builders doesn’t have direct effect on endothelial function. Future study with bigger sample size and measurement of AAS metabolites is recommended.
 Key words: endothelium, lipids, anabolic steroids, body buildershttp://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/45
spellingShingle H Hashemi
F Bayat
R Heidari
R Basiratnia
Y Kiyani
Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
Journal of Research in Medical Sciences
title Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
title_full Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
title_fullStr Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
title_full_unstemmed Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
title_short Endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
title_sort endothelial function in male body builders taking anabolic androgenic steroids
url http://journals.mui.ac.ir/jrms/article/view/45
work_keys_str_mv AT hhashemi endothelialfunctioninmalebodybuilderstakinganabolicandrogenicsteroids
AT fbayat endothelialfunctioninmalebodybuilderstakinganabolicandrogenicsteroids
AT rheidari endothelialfunctioninmalebodybuilderstakinganabolicandrogenicsteroids
AT rbasiratnia endothelialfunctioninmalebodybuilderstakinganabolicandrogenicsteroids
AT ykiyani endothelialfunctioninmalebodybuilderstakinganabolicandrogenicsteroids