Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers

ABSTRACT: Holsteins and Jerseys, the 2 most prominent dairy breeds in the United States, differ in many regards. They have not been evaluated for differences in oral behavior performance, despite anecdotal evidence that Jerseys perform more abnormal behaviors than Holsteins. As abnormal behaviors ca...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Blair C. Downey, Cassandra B. Tucker
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2023-12-01
Series:Journal of Dairy Science
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030223005817
_version_ 1797390535793573888
author Blair C. Downey
Cassandra B. Tucker
author_facet Blair C. Downey
Cassandra B. Tucker
author_sort Blair C. Downey
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT: Holsteins and Jerseys, the 2 most prominent dairy breeds in the United States, differ in many regards. They have not been evaluated for differences in oral behavior performance, despite anecdotal evidence that Jerseys perform more abnormal behaviors than Holsteins. As abnormal behaviors can indicate compromised welfare, we evaluated whether breed differences existed in year-old heifers. Because many oral behaviors could be expressed in abnormal ways, we also sought to describe performance of a wide range of behaviors and whether these varied among individuals. We studied 42 pair-housed heifers (33 Holstein, 9 Jersey) at 12.8 ± 1.1 mo of age (mean ± SD) that were restricted to 50% of their ad libitum total mixed ration (TMR) intake for 2 d as part of a short-term feed challenge. Using continuous video recording from 0800 to 2000 h on the second day of feed restriction, we scored time spent performing tongue rolling, tongue flicking, self-grooming, allogrooming, intersucking, drinking urine, drinking water, and nonnutritive oral manipulation (NNOM) of rice hull bedding, the feed bin, or other pen fixtures. Eating TMR was recorded at 5-min intervals. We found that Jerseys spent more time tongue rolling (3.3% vs. 0.2% proportion of 12-h observations) and performing all types of NNOM than Holsteins (feed bin: 3.8% vs. 2.4%; bedding: 7.7% vs. 5.4%; other: 7.5% vs. 4.2%; total: 19.0% vs. 12.0%), and tended to spend more time tongue flicking (1.4% vs. 1.1%). Jerseys spent less time allogrooming than Holsteins (1.3% vs. 3.4%). There was no evidence of an effect of breed on self-grooming (2.0%), water drinking (1.0%), eating TMR (16.0%), or intersucking (0.06%). Urine drinking was performed by 9 total heifers and was not compared between breeds. All behaviors were highly variable across individuals, particularly tongue rolling and intersucking. Allogrooming was more variable than self-grooming, and each subcategory of NNOM was more variable than total NNOM. Outliers, or extreme performance of oral behaviors relative to the rest of our population, were present in most behaviors. Heifers who were outliers in one behavior were not consistently outliers in all. Overall, there are breed differences in many oral behaviors in a feed-restricted environment. Despite no difference in proportion of time spent eating, Jerseys often performed higher levels of potentially abnormal behaviors than Holsteins, though both breeds performed many oral behaviors, sometimes at extreme levels, that may indicate a concern.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T23:13:14Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a3a27b5ac4c4b949cd8891e36d6357b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0022-0302
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T23:13:14Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Journal of Dairy Science
spelling doaj.art-2a3a27b5ac4c4b949cd8891e36d6357b2023-12-15T07:22:06ZengElsevierJournal of Dairy Science0022-03022023-12-011061294409450Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifersBlair C. Downey0Cassandra B. Tucker1Center for Animal Welfare, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616; Animal Behavior Graduate Group, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616Center for Animal Welfare, Department of Animal Science, University of California, Davis, Davis, CA 95616; Corresponding authorABSTRACT: Holsteins and Jerseys, the 2 most prominent dairy breeds in the United States, differ in many regards. They have not been evaluated for differences in oral behavior performance, despite anecdotal evidence that Jerseys perform more abnormal behaviors than Holsteins. As abnormal behaviors can indicate compromised welfare, we evaluated whether breed differences existed in year-old heifers. Because many oral behaviors could be expressed in abnormal ways, we also sought to describe performance of a wide range of behaviors and whether these varied among individuals. We studied 42 pair-housed heifers (33 Holstein, 9 Jersey) at 12.8 ± 1.1 mo of age (mean ± SD) that were restricted to 50% of their ad libitum total mixed ration (TMR) intake for 2 d as part of a short-term feed challenge. Using continuous video recording from 0800 to 2000 h on the second day of feed restriction, we scored time spent performing tongue rolling, tongue flicking, self-grooming, allogrooming, intersucking, drinking urine, drinking water, and nonnutritive oral manipulation (NNOM) of rice hull bedding, the feed bin, or other pen fixtures. Eating TMR was recorded at 5-min intervals. We found that Jerseys spent more time tongue rolling (3.3% vs. 0.2% proportion of 12-h observations) and performing all types of NNOM than Holsteins (feed bin: 3.8% vs. 2.4%; bedding: 7.7% vs. 5.4%; other: 7.5% vs. 4.2%; total: 19.0% vs. 12.0%), and tended to spend more time tongue flicking (1.4% vs. 1.1%). Jerseys spent less time allogrooming than Holsteins (1.3% vs. 3.4%). There was no evidence of an effect of breed on self-grooming (2.0%), water drinking (1.0%), eating TMR (16.0%), or intersucking (0.06%). Urine drinking was performed by 9 total heifers and was not compared between breeds. All behaviors were highly variable across individuals, particularly tongue rolling and intersucking. Allogrooming was more variable than self-grooming, and each subcategory of NNOM was more variable than total NNOM. Outliers, or extreme performance of oral behaviors relative to the rest of our population, were present in most behaviors. Heifers who were outliers in one behavior were not consistently outliers in all. Overall, there are breed differences in many oral behaviors in a feed-restricted environment. Despite no difference in proportion of time spent eating, Jerseys often performed higher levels of potentially abnormal behaviors than Holsteins, though both breeds performed many oral behaviors, sometimes at extreme levels, that may indicate a concern.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030223005817JerseyHolsteinabnormal behavior
spellingShingle Blair C. Downey
Cassandra B. Tucker
Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
Journal of Dairy Science
Jersey
Holstein
abnormal behavior
title Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
title_full Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
title_fullStr Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
title_full_unstemmed Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
title_short Breed differences in oral behaviors in feed-restricted dairy heifers
title_sort breed differences in oral behaviors in feed restricted dairy heifers
topic Jersey
Holstein
abnormal behavior
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022030223005817
work_keys_str_mv AT blaircdowney breeddifferencesinoralbehaviorsinfeedrestricteddairyheifers
AT cassandrabtucker breeddifferencesinoralbehaviorsinfeedrestricteddairyheifers