Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis
A novel and comprehensive evaluation index considering various processing parameters in additive manufacturing with four different scanning patterns was proposed. The relationship between the evaluation index and the performance of parts made by directed energy deposition was established and verifie...
| Main Authors: | , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Taylor & Francis Group
2021-09-01
|
| Series: | Virtual and Physical Prototyping |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2021.1896173 |
| _version_ | 1797678674800017408 |
|---|---|
| author | Yang Zhang Hongyang Jing Lianyong Xu Yongdian Han Lei Zhao |
| author_facet | Yang Zhang Hongyang Jing Lianyong Xu Yongdian Han Lei Zhao |
| author_sort | Yang Zhang |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | A novel and comprehensive evaluation index considering various processing parameters in additive manufacturing with four different scanning patterns was proposed. The relationship between the evaluation index and the performance of parts made by directed energy deposition was established and verified by experiments. The differences of thermal evolution between four scanning patterns were analysed. Comprehensive evaluation indices corresponding to different scanning patterns were calculated by integrating the contributions of various parameters, such as delamination, warping, porosity, heat accumulation, cooling rate, dendrite spacing, and deposition efficiency. The comprehensive evaluation indices off our scanning patterns were ranked in the following order (from lowest to highest): single-track zigzag, single-track, bi-direction, and spiral inward patterns. The performance of the single-track zigzag pattern was the best, and that of the spiral inward pattern was the worst. The single-track and bi-direction patterns showed intermediate performances under the same conditions. The closer the index is to zero, the better the performance. This index can be used for the quantitative evaluation of process quality and prediction of performance. It provides guidance for additive manufacturing process development and optimisation, reduces workload, and provides a new idea for quantitative performance evaluation and prediction of parts fabricated by additive manufacturing. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:02:19Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2a3ca7ce4f7448bc88f8ad65ff23ad24 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1745-2759 1745-2767 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-03-11T23:02:19Z |
| publishDate | 2021-09-01 |
| publisher | Taylor & Francis Group |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Virtual and Physical Prototyping |
| spelling | doaj.art-2a3ca7ce4f7448bc88f8ad65ff23ad242023-09-21T14:38:02ZengTaylor & Francis GroupVirtual and Physical Prototyping1745-27591745-27672021-09-0116S1S98S11510.1080/17452759.2021.18961731896173Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysisYang Zhang0Hongyang Jing1Lianyong Xu2Yongdian Han3Lei Zhao4Tianjin UniversityTianjin UniversityTianjin UniversityTianjin UniversityTianjin UniversityA novel and comprehensive evaluation index considering various processing parameters in additive manufacturing with four different scanning patterns was proposed. The relationship between the evaluation index and the performance of parts made by directed energy deposition was established and verified by experiments. The differences of thermal evolution between four scanning patterns were analysed. Comprehensive evaluation indices corresponding to different scanning patterns were calculated by integrating the contributions of various parameters, such as delamination, warping, porosity, heat accumulation, cooling rate, dendrite spacing, and deposition efficiency. The comprehensive evaluation indices off our scanning patterns were ranked in the following order (from lowest to highest): single-track zigzag, single-track, bi-direction, and spiral inward patterns. The performance of the single-track zigzag pattern was the best, and that of the spiral inward pattern was the worst. The single-track and bi-direction patterns showed intermediate performances under the same conditions. The closer the index is to zero, the better the performance. This index can be used for the quantitative evaluation of process quality and prediction of performance. It provides guidance for additive manufacturing process development and optimisation, reduces workload, and provides a new idea for quantitative performance evaluation and prediction of parts fabricated by additive manufacturing.http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2021.1896173directed energy depositioninconel 718scanning patterncomprehensive evaluation indexthermal analysis |
| spellingShingle | Yang Zhang Hongyang Jing Lianyong Xu Yongdian Han Lei Zhao Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis Virtual and Physical Prototyping directed energy deposition inconel 718 scanning pattern comprehensive evaluation index thermal analysis |
| title | Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis |
| title_full | Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis |
| title_fullStr | Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis |
| title_full_unstemmed | Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis |
| title_short | Effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy-directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis |
| title_sort | effects of different scanning patterns on nickel alloy directed energy deposition based on thermal analysis |
| topic | directed energy deposition inconel 718 scanning pattern comprehensive evaluation index thermal analysis |
| url | http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/17452759.2021.1896173 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT yangzhang effectsofdifferentscanningpatternsonnickelalloydirectedenergydepositionbasedonthermalanalysis AT hongyangjing effectsofdifferentscanningpatternsonnickelalloydirectedenergydepositionbasedonthermalanalysis AT lianyongxu effectsofdifferentscanningpatternsonnickelalloydirectedenergydepositionbasedonthermalanalysis AT yongdianhan effectsofdifferentscanningpatternsonnickelalloydirectedenergydepositionbasedonthermalanalysis AT leizhao effectsofdifferentscanningpatternsonnickelalloydirectedenergydepositionbasedonthermalanalysis |