Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series
Abstract Background Considering the epidemiology of single-level lumbar disc herniations (LDH) in the young and active patients, the impact on working capacity is highly relevant. The timing of return-to-work after lumbar surgery through various modalities differs greatly. This may be partly due div...
Main Authors: | , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2024-02-01
|
Series: | The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00803-1 |
_version_ | 1797275400495169536 |
---|---|
author | Ismail Bozkurt Cagri Canbolat Kemal Paksoy Salim Senturk Onur Yaman |
author_facet | Ismail Bozkurt Cagri Canbolat Kemal Paksoy Salim Senturk Onur Yaman |
author_sort | Ismail Bozkurt |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background Considering the epidemiology of single-level lumbar disc herniations (LDH) in the young and active patients, the impact on working capacity is highly relevant. The timing of return-to-work after lumbar surgery through various modalities differs greatly. This may be partly due diverse disparate surgical approaches along with differences in patient and surgeon. The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence for a return-to-work policy after endoscopic sequestrectomy and discuss possible clues to a faster recovery of patients that did not receive a sick-leave report via a case series. Case presentation The sample comprises fourteen cases of single-level LDH that underwent endoscopic interlaminar sequestrectomy and did not receive a sick-leave report and were advised to return-to-work whenever they felt fit so. Time until return-to-work, pre- and post-operative leg VAS pain scores and amount of analgesic used post-operatively were retrospectively analyzed. Fourteen patients were operated on using the same technique and on average returned to work after 6.6 ± 1.8 days, used 3.7 ± 2.5 analgesic tablets before returning to work and had a postoperative leg VAS pain score of 1.4 ± 1.2. No patient requested a sick-leave report during the follow-up period of 1 month. Conclusions The patients in this case series had a remarkably short period of sick-leave and a low number of analgesic usage. These findings may be due to selection of patients who were operated on specifically for leg pain with the absence of lower back pain suggesting integrity of annulus fibrosus. We can postulate that intraoperative preservation of lamina, facet joint and annulus fibrosus along with reassurance of the surgeon suggesting to return-to-work whenever fell fit so were the key factors in the swifter recovery of the patients. |
first_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:13:48Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2a40fff2763f4777aa429426e453cd4f |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 1687-8329 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-03-07T15:13:48Z |
publishDate | 2024-02-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery |
spelling | doaj.art-2a40fff2763f4777aa429426e453cd4f2024-03-05T18:01:59ZengSpringerOpenThe Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery1687-83292024-02-016011710.1186/s41983-024-00803-1Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case seriesIsmail Bozkurt0Cagri Canbolat1Kemal Paksoy2Salim Senturk3Onur Yaman4Department of Neurosurgery, Medical Park Ankara HospitalMemorial Spine Center, Neurosurgery ClinicMemorial Spine Center, Neurosurgery ClinicMemorial Spine Center, Neurosurgery ClinicMemorial Spine Center, Neurosurgery ClinicAbstract Background Considering the epidemiology of single-level lumbar disc herniations (LDH) in the young and active patients, the impact on working capacity is highly relevant. The timing of return-to-work after lumbar surgery through various modalities differs greatly. This may be partly due diverse disparate surgical approaches along with differences in patient and surgeon. The purpose of this paper is to provide evidence for a return-to-work policy after endoscopic sequestrectomy and discuss possible clues to a faster recovery of patients that did not receive a sick-leave report via a case series. Case presentation The sample comprises fourteen cases of single-level LDH that underwent endoscopic interlaminar sequestrectomy and did not receive a sick-leave report and were advised to return-to-work whenever they felt fit so. Time until return-to-work, pre- and post-operative leg VAS pain scores and amount of analgesic used post-operatively were retrospectively analyzed. Fourteen patients were operated on using the same technique and on average returned to work after 6.6 ± 1.8 days, used 3.7 ± 2.5 analgesic tablets before returning to work and had a postoperative leg VAS pain score of 1.4 ± 1.2. No patient requested a sick-leave report during the follow-up period of 1 month. Conclusions The patients in this case series had a remarkably short period of sick-leave and a low number of analgesic usage. These findings may be due to selection of patients who were operated on specifically for leg pain with the absence of lower back pain suggesting integrity of annulus fibrosus. We can postulate that intraoperative preservation of lamina, facet joint and annulus fibrosus along with reassurance of the surgeon suggesting to return-to-work whenever fell fit so were the key factors in the swifter recovery of the patients.https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00803-1LumbarSpineSurgeryPELDReturn-to-workInterlaminar |
spellingShingle | Ismail Bozkurt Cagri Canbolat Kemal Paksoy Salim Senturk Onur Yaman Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series The Egyptian Journal of Neurology, Psychiatry and Neurosurgery Lumbar Spine Surgery PELD Return-to-work Interlaminar |
title | Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series |
title_full | Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series |
title_fullStr | Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series |
title_full_unstemmed | Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series |
title_short | Return-to-work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy: case series |
title_sort | return to work after interlaminar endoscopic sequestrectomy case series |
topic | Lumbar Spine Surgery PELD Return-to-work Interlaminar |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s41983-024-00803-1 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ismailbozkurt returntoworkafterinterlaminarendoscopicsequestrectomycaseseries AT cagricanbolat returntoworkafterinterlaminarendoscopicsequestrectomycaseseries AT kemalpaksoy returntoworkafterinterlaminarendoscopicsequestrectomycaseseries AT salimsenturk returntoworkafterinterlaminarendoscopicsequestrectomycaseseries AT onuryaman returntoworkafterinterlaminarendoscopicsequestrectomycaseseries |