The first year of a new era

The first year of a new era

What happened when eLife decided to eliminate accept/reject decisions after peer review?

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors:	Timothy E Behrens, Yamini Dalal, Diane M Harper, Detlef Weigel
Format:	Article
Language:	English
Published:	eLife Sciences Publications Ltd 2024-02-01
Series:	eLife
Subjects:	scientific publishing peer review preprints research assessment research communication
Online Access:	https://elifesciences.org/articles/96413

Similar Items

Implementing a "publish, then review" model of publishing
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

Peer review without gatekeeping
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2022-10-01)

Publishing in the time of COVID-19
by: Michael B Eisen, et al.
Published: (2020-03-01)

eLife’s new model and its impact on science communication
by: Lara Urban, et al.
Published: (2022-12-01)

Priority of discovery in the life sciences
by: Ronald D Vale, et al.
Published: (2016-06-01)

A new twist on peer review
by: Mark Patterson, et al.
Published: (2018-06-01)

Beyond scoops to best practices
by: Eve Marder
Published: (2017-07-01)

Rigorous review and editorial oversight of clinical preprints
by: Mone Zaidi, et al.
Published: (2021-06-01)

Current concerns on journal article with preprint: perspectives
by: Hyoung-Chul Oh, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01)

Current concerns on journal article with preprint: Anesthesia and Pain Medicine perspectives
by: Hyun Kang, et al.
Published: (2023-04-01)

All publishers are predatory - some are bigger than others
by: OLAVO B. AMARAL
Published: (2018-05-01)

Releasing a preprint is associated with more attention and citations for the peer-reviewed article
by: Darwin Y Fu, et al.
Published: (2019-12-01)

International authorship and collaboration across bioRxiv preprints
by: Richard J Abdill, et al.
Published: (2020-07-01)

What makes an eLife paper in epidemiology and global health?
by: Mark Jit, et al.
Published: (2015-10-01)

A year in the life of eLife
by: Randy Schekman, et al.
Published: (2013-10-01)

The eLife approach to peer review
by: Randy Schekman, et al.
Published: (2013-04-01)

The rhetoric of preprints
by: Rafael Leite Pacheco, et al.
Published: (2022-01-01)

Promoting constructive feedback on preprints with the FAST principles
by: Sandra Franco Iborra, et al.
Published: (2022-04-01)

E-preprint and Scholarly Communication
by: Wen-Yau Cathy Lin
Published: (2003-09-01)

What is the Future of Preprint Peer Review?
by: Richard Sever, et al.
Published: (2023-03-01)

'At-risk articles': the imperative to recover lost science
by: Jeanette Hatherill
Published: (2020-06-01)

Progress and promise
by: Randy Schekman
Published: (2019-01-01)

Manuscript formatting, delayed peer-reviews, and overemphasizing the impact factor: can something be done?
by: Vijay Kothari
Published: (2023-01-01)

Usos, limitaciones y prospectiva de la evaluación por pares
by: Faustino Moreno Ceja, et al.
Published: (2012-08-01)

The evolution, benefits, and challenges of preprints and their interaction with journals
by: Pippa Smart
Published: (2022-02-01)

Comparing quality of reporting between preprints and peer-reviewed articles in the biomedical literature
by: Clarissa F. D. Carneiro, et al.
Published: (2020-12-01)

The collective wisdom in the COVID-19 research: Comparison and synthesis of epidemiological parameter estimates in preprints and peer-reviewed articles
by: Yuejiao Wang, et al.
Published: (2021-03-01)

Editorial: Open when, why, to whom? Changing challenges, perspectives and practices in a new research culture
by: Rogério Mugnaini, et al.
Published: (2023-10-01)

Using Preprints for Journal Clubs
by: Arturo Casadevall, et al.
Published: (2018-05-01)

Online Braz J of Nursing 2006 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2006-12-01)

Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 2007 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2007-11-01)

To be SEER 1.0 or not to be SEER 2.0? That is one of a few questions
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2007-04-01)

Peer review: what are the OBJN responsabilities?
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2006-12-01)

Online Brazilian Journal of Nursing 2007 Thanks to Peer Reviewers and Authors
by: Isabel CF da Cruz
Published: (2007-12-01)

Anonymity of reviewing: Arguments for and against
by: Todorović Ljubomir
Published: (2002-01-01)

Tracking the popularity and outcomes of all bioRxiv preprints
by: Richard J Abdill, et al.
Published: (2019-04-01)

Peer-Review im Rampenlicht
by: Claudia Frick
Published: (2020-09-01)

Room at the top
by: Randy Schekman
Published: (2017-10-01)

Recognizing the importance of new tools and resources for research
by: Randy Schekman, et al.
Published: (2015-03-01)

The Role of the Journal Impact Factor in Chemistry Research
by: Rosaria Ciriminna, et al.
Published: (2023-02-01)