Publication bias impacts on effect size, statistical power, and magnitude (Type M) and sign (Type S) errors in ecology and evolutionary biology
Abstract Collaborative efforts to directly replicate empirical studies in the medical and social sciences have revealed alarmingly low rates of replicability, a phenomenon dubbed the ‘replication crisis’. Poor replicability has spurred cultural changes targeted at improving reliability in these disc...
Main Authors: | Yefeng Yang, Alfredo Sánchez-Tójar, Rose E. O’Dea, Daniel W. A. Noble, Julia Koricheva, Michael D. Jennions, Timothy H. Parker, Malgorzata Lagisz, Shinichi Nakagawa |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
BMC
2023-04-01
|
Series: | BMC Biology |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s12915-022-01485-y |
Similar Items
-
A review of reproducible and transparent research practices in urology publications from 2014 to2018
by: Shelby Rauh, et al.
Published: (2022-07-01) -
Next steps after airing disagreement on a scientific issue with policy implications: a meta-analysis, multi-lab replication and adversarial collaboration
by: Shinichi Nakagawa, et al.
Published: (2023-05-01) -
Mitigating the epidemic of type I error: ecology and evolution can learn from other disciplines
by: Timothy Hume Parker, et al.
Published: (2014-11-01) -
Investigating the replicability of preclinical cancer biology
by: Timothy M Errington, et al.
Published: (2021-12-01) -
The REPRISE project: protocol for an evaluation of REProducibility and Replicability In Syntheses of Evidence
by: Matthew J. Page, et al.
Published: (2021-04-01)