Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK

Abstract Greenspaces facilitate well‐being benefits for humans in several ways including through cognitive restoration, physical exercise and social interaction. However, some groups are under‐represented in greenspaces, including women, older people, those with health conditions, people with lower...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: C. Ward, A. K. Palmer, B. F. T. Brockett, R. Costanza, J. Hatfield, I. Kubiszewski, P. Langford, K. Pickett, C. Willis
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2023-08-01
Series:People and Nature
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10507
_version_ 1797755580880781312
author C. Ward
A. K. Palmer
B. F. T. Brockett
R. Costanza
J. Hatfield
I. Kubiszewski
P. Langford
K. Pickett
C. Willis
author_facet C. Ward
A. K. Palmer
B. F. T. Brockett
R. Costanza
J. Hatfield
I. Kubiszewski
P. Langford
K. Pickett
C. Willis
author_sort C. Ward
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Greenspaces facilitate well‐being benefits for humans in several ways including through cognitive restoration, physical exercise and social interaction. However, some groups are under‐represented in greenspaces, including women, older people, those with health conditions, people with lower socioeconomic status and people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and so are less likely to accrue these benefits. Using thematic analysis and semi‐structured interviews with 40 individuals from under‐represented groups in Leeds, UK, we explore (1) a range of perceived barriers to greenspace access, (2) how spending time in greenspace contributes to well‐being for these groups, (3) the perceived positive and negative aspects of greenspace, (4) what impact COVID‐19 had on access to greenspace and (5) how greenspaces could be improved. We also highlight inter‐group differences and how some barriers disproportionately affect some of the groups in this study. Safety concerns were particularly important for women and people with low incomes, which included problems with anti‐social behaviour (e.g. incivilities and disorder). Cultural barriers were also evident with ethnic minority participants often citing concerns about dogs and issues with visibility and prejudice. Participants desired physical improvements to the quality of greenspaces, along with easier access and transport options, changes in policy regarding dogs and increased security and park wardens to limit anti‐social behaviour. We argue that to increase visitation for under‐represented groups, upgrades in the physical environment must be coupled with harnessing community involvement and co‐design. Some group differences and tensions in greenspaces, and problems with anti‐social behaviours and safety concerns might be limited by more considerate planning and incorporating research findings that address these tensions through intergroup contact. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T17:48:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a4dfd3d34014c96a8d1c0c2aae960f2
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2575-8314
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T17:48:18Z
publishDate 2023-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series People and Nature
spelling doaj.art-2a4dfd3d34014c96a8d1c0c2aae960f22023-08-03T10:26:58ZengWileyPeople and Nature2575-83142023-08-01541284129810.1002/pan3.10507Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UKC. Ward0A. K. Palmer1B. F. T. Brockett2R. Costanza3J. Hatfield4I. Kubiszewski5P. Langford6K. Pickett7C. Willis8Leverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity University of York York UKGeography and Planning The University of Liverpool Liverpool UKChief Scientist's Directorate Natural England Worcester UKLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity University of York York UKLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity University of York York UKLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity University of York York UKChief Scientist's Directorate Natural England Worcester UKLeverhulme Centre for Anthropocene Biodiversity University of York York UKConnecting People with Nature Programme Natural England Worcester UKAbstract Greenspaces facilitate well‐being benefits for humans in several ways including through cognitive restoration, physical exercise and social interaction. However, some groups are under‐represented in greenspaces, including women, older people, those with health conditions, people with lower socioeconomic status and people from ethnic minority backgrounds, and so are less likely to accrue these benefits. Using thematic analysis and semi‐structured interviews with 40 individuals from under‐represented groups in Leeds, UK, we explore (1) a range of perceived barriers to greenspace access, (2) how spending time in greenspace contributes to well‐being for these groups, (3) the perceived positive and negative aspects of greenspace, (4) what impact COVID‐19 had on access to greenspace and (5) how greenspaces could be improved. We also highlight inter‐group differences and how some barriers disproportionately affect some of the groups in this study. Safety concerns were particularly important for women and people with low incomes, which included problems with anti‐social behaviour (e.g. incivilities and disorder). Cultural barriers were also evident with ethnic minority participants often citing concerns about dogs and issues with visibility and prejudice. Participants desired physical improvements to the quality of greenspaces, along with easier access and transport options, changes in policy regarding dogs and increased security and park wardens to limit anti‐social behaviour. We argue that to increase visitation for under‐represented groups, upgrades in the physical environment must be coupled with harnessing community involvement and co‐design. Some group differences and tensions in greenspaces, and problems with anti‐social behaviours and safety concerns might be limited by more considerate planning and incorporating research findings that address these tensions through intergroup contact. Read the free Plain Language Summary for this article on the Journal blog.https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10507ableismCOVID‐19inclusioninequalitynaturequalitative
spellingShingle C. Ward
A. K. Palmer
B. F. T. Brockett
R. Costanza
J. Hatfield
I. Kubiszewski
P. Langford
K. Pickett
C. Willis
Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK
People and Nature
ableism
COVID‐19
inclusion
inequality
nature
qualitative
title Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK
title_full Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK
title_fullStr Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK
title_full_unstemmed Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK
title_short Perceptions, preferences and barriers: A qualitative study of greenspace and under‐representation in Leeds, UK
title_sort perceptions preferences and barriers a qualitative study of greenspace and under representation in leeds uk
topic ableism
COVID‐19
inclusion
inequality
nature
qualitative
url https://doi.org/10.1002/pan3.10507
work_keys_str_mv AT cward perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT akpalmer perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT bftbrockett perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT rcostanza perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT jhatfield perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT ikubiszewski perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT plangford perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT kpickett perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk
AT cwillis perceptionspreferencesandbarriersaqualitativestudyofgreenspaceandunderrepresentationinleedsuk