Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives

Hip joints are highly involved in table tennis. Some authors found both pelvic angular velocity and hip joint torques are related to the racket velocity. Others have also demonstrated how some of the best players have higher ranges of motion of the lower-limb joints. Therefore, the mechanical work...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Thibault Marsan, Philippe Rouch, Patricia Thoreux, Rozenn Jacquet-Yquel, Christophe Sauret
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Universidad de Granada 2019-12-01
Series:International Journal of Racket Sports Science
Subjects:
Online Access:https://journal.racketsportscience.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/26
_version_ 1818118016455409664
author Thibault Marsan
Philippe Rouch
Patricia Thoreux
Rozenn Jacquet-Yquel
Christophe Sauret
author_facet Thibault Marsan
Philippe Rouch
Patricia Thoreux
Rozenn Jacquet-Yquel
Christophe Sauret
author_sort Thibault Marsan
collection DOAJ
description Hip joints are highly involved in table tennis. Some authors found both pelvic angular velocity and hip joint torques are related to the racket velocity. Others have also demonstrated how some of the best players have higher ranges of motion of the lower-limb joints. Therefore, the mechanical work generated by the playing-side-hip can be seen as indicator of the playing intensity associated with different strokes. The aim of this study was to quantify the hip joint mechanical work and power during four classical strokes. Motion capture acquisitions were performed on two international players. A biplanar radiographic acquisition was also performed to personalize the biomechanical model. Hip joint velocity and torques were calculated on the dominant side, allowing mechanical power and work to be calculated between the end of backswing and the ball impact. The highest level of mechanical work from the hip joint was found for forehand drive against backspin and forehand topspin drive with pivot. A backhand drive required the lowest hip mechanical work, and the forehand drive against topspin was found to be intermediate. The lower work required from the backhand stroke makes it suitable as a waiting stroke.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T04:47:36Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a599ffc36d34f8cb21bed21665a8e08
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2695-4508
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T04:47:36Z
publishDate 2019-12-01
publisher Universidad de Granada
record_format Article
series International Journal of Racket Sports Science
spelling doaj.art-2a599ffc36d34f8cb21bed21665a8e082022-12-22T01:20:28ZengUniversidad de GranadaInternational Journal of Racket Sports Science2695-45082019-12-011210.30827/Digibug.59706Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drivesThibault Marsan0Philippe Rouch1Patricia Thoreux2Rozenn Jacquet-Yquel3Christophe Sauret4Institut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges CharpakInstitut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges CharpakInstitut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges CharpakINSEPInstitut de Biomécanique Humaine Georges Charpak Hip joints are highly involved in table tennis. Some authors found both pelvic angular velocity and hip joint torques are related to the racket velocity. Others have also demonstrated how some of the best players have higher ranges of motion of the lower-limb joints. Therefore, the mechanical work generated by the playing-side-hip can be seen as indicator of the playing intensity associated with different strokes. The aim of this study was to quantify the hip joint mechanical work and power during four classical strokes. Motion capture acquisitions were performed on two international players. A biplanar radiographic acquisition was also performed to personalize the biomechanical model. Hip joint velocity and torques were calculated on the dominant side, allowing mechanical power and work to be calculated between the end of backswing and the ball impact. The highest level of mechanical work from the hip joint was found for forehand drive against backspin and forehand topspin drive with pivot. A backhand drive required the lowest hip mechanical work, and the forehand drive against topspin was found to be intermediate. The lower work required from the backhand stroke makes it suitable as a waiting stroke. https://journal.racketsportscience.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/26Table TennisHip JointMechanical Work
spellingShingle Thibault Marsan
Philippe Rouch
Patricia Thoreux
Rozenn Jacquet-Yquel
Christophe Sauret
Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
International Journal of Racket Sports Science
Table Tennis
Hip Joint
Mechanical Work
title Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
title_full Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
title_fullStr Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
title_short Comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
title_sort comparison of hip joint mechanical energetics in table tennis forehand and backhand drives
topic Table Tennis
Hip Joint
Mechanical Work
url https://journal.racketsportscience.org/index.php/ijrss/article/view/26
work_keys_str_mv AT thibaultmarsan comparisonofhipjointmechanicalenergeticsintabletennisforehandandbackhanddrives
AT philipperouch comparisonofhipjointmechanicalenergeticsintabletennisforehandandbackhanddrives
AT patriciathoreux comparisonofhipjointmechanicalenergeticsintabletennisforehandandbackhanddrives
AT rozennjacquetyquel comparisonofhipjointmechanicalenergeticsintabletennisforehandandbackhanddrives
AT christophesauret comparisonofhipjointmechanicalenergeticsintabletennisforehandandbackhanddrives