Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists
Abstract Background POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) is an important diagnostic tool for several medical specialties. To provide safe patient care, the quality of this exam should be as high as possible. This includes solid documentation with a written report and the availability of images for revie...
Main Authors: | , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SpringerOpen
2022-04-01
|
Series: | The Ultrasound Journal |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00267-5 |
_version_ | 1818060640267272192 |
---|---|
author | Larissa van Essen Tycho J. Olgers Moritz van Heel Jan C. ter Maaten |
author_facet | Larissa van Essen Tycho J. Olgers Moritz van Heel Jan C. ter Maaten |
author_sort | Larissa van Essen |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Background POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) is an important diagnostic tool for several medical specialties. To provide safe patient care, the quality of this exam should be as high as possible. This includes solid documentation with a written report and the availability of images for review. However, international guidelines or publications about this quality assessment and its application in clinical practice are scarce. Methods We designed a criteria-checklist to evaluate the quality of POCUS examinations. This checklist was made based on international guidelines and protocols and was validated by a Dutch expert group using the nominal group technique (NGT). All POCUS exams in general internal medicine patients documented between August 2019 and November 2020 in our ED were evaluated using this checklist. Results A total of 169 exams were included. In general, the compliance for most important criteria was high, but not optimal. A clinical question or indication for the POCUS exam was stated in 75.7% of cases. The completeness of all standard views differed per indication, but was lower when more than one standard view was required. Labels were provided in 83.5% of the saved images, while 90.8% of all examinations showed a written conclusion. Conclusions Our research showed that the overall quality of documentation varies with regard to several important criteria. Suboptimal compliance of documentation may have adverse effects on patient safety. We have developed a checklist which can be used to improve POCUS documentation. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-10T13:35:38Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2a72a190255640f5a85d2525ab32c231 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2524-8987 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-12-10T13:35:38Z |
publishDate | 2022-04-01 |
publisher | SpringerOpen |
record_format | Article |
series | The Ultrasound Journal |
spelling | doaj.art-2a72a190255640f5a85d2525ab32c2312022-12-22T01:46:50ZengSpringerOpenThe Ultrasound Journal2524-89872022-04-011411910.1186/s13089-022-00267-5Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internistsLarissa van Essen0Tycho J. Olgers1Moritz van Heel2Jan C. ter Maaten3Department Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenDepartment Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenDepartment Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenDepartment Internal Medicine, University Medical Center Groningen, University of GroningenAbstract Background POCUS (point-of-care ultrasound) is an important diagnostic tool for several medical specialties. To provide safe patient care, the quality of this exam should be as high as possible. This includes solid documentation with a written report and the availability of images for review. However, international guidelines or publications about this quality assessment and its application in clinical practice are scarce. Methods We designed a criteria-checklist to evaluate the quality of POCUS examinations. This checklist was made based on international guidelines and protocols and was validated by a Dutch expert group using the nominal group technique (NGT). All POCUS exams in general internal medicine patients documented between August 2019 and November 2020 in our ED were evaluated using this checklist. Results A total of 169 exams were included. In general, the compliance for most important criteria was high, but not optimal. A clinical question or indication for the POCUS exam was stated in 75.7% of cases. The completeness of all standard views differed per indication, but was lower when more than one standard view was required. Labels were provided in 83.5% of the saved images, while 90.8% of all examinations showed a written conclusion. Conclusions Our research showed that the overall quality of documentation varies with regard to several important criteria. Suboptimal compliance of documentation may have adverse effects on patient safety. We have developed a checklist which can be used to improve POCUS documentation.https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00267-5Documentation qualityPOCUSPoint-of-care ultrasoundEPAUltrasound reportCriteria-checklist |
spellingShingle | Larissa van Essen Tycho J. Olgers Moritz van Heel Jan C. ter Maaten Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists The Ultrasound Journal Documentation quality POCUS Point-of-care ultrasound EPA Ultrasound report Criteria-checklist |
title | Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists |
title_full | Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists |
title_fullStr | Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists |
title_full_unstemmed | Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists |
title_short | Quality assessment of point-of-care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists |
title_sort | quality assessment of point of care ultrasound reports for patients at the emergency department treated by internists |
topic | Documentation quality POCUS Point-of-care ultrasound EPA Ultrasound report Criteria-checklist |
url | https://doi.org/10.1186/s13089-022-00267-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT larissavanessen qualityassessmentofpointofcareultrasoundreportsforpatientsattheemergencydepartmenttreatedbyinternists AT tychojolgers qualityassessmentofpointofcareultrasoundreportsforpatientsattheemergencydepartmenttreatedbyinternists AT moritzvanheel qualityassessmentofpointofcareultrasoundreportsforpatientsattheemergencydepartmenttreatedbyinternists AT janctermaaten qualityassessmentofpointofcareultrasoundreportsforpatientsattheemergencydepartmenttreatedbyinternists |