Cosmicflows-4

With Cosmicflows- 4, distances are compiled for 55,877 galaxies gathered into 38,065 groups. Eight methodologies are employed, with the largest numbers coming from the correlations between the photometric and kinematic properties of spiral galaxies (TF) and elliptical galaxies (FP). Supernovae that...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: R. Brent Tully, Ehsan Kourkchi, Hélène M. Courtois, Gagandeep S. Anand, John P. Blakeslee, Dillon Brout, Thomas de Jaeger, Alexandra Dupuy, Daniel Guinet, Cullan Howlett, Joseph B. Jensen, Daniel Pomarède, Luca Rizzi, David Rubin, Khaled Said, Daniel Scolnic, Benjamin E. Stahl
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Astrophysical Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac94d8
_version_ 1797695754108665856
author R. Brent Tully
Ehsan Kourkchi
Hélène M. Courtois
Gagandeep S. Anand
John P. Blakeslee
Dillon Brout
Thomas de Jaeger
Alexandra Dupuy
Daniel Guinet
Cullan Howlett
Joseph B. Jensen
Daniel Pomarède
Luca Rizzi
David Rubin
Khaled Said
Daniel Scolnic
Benjamin E. Stahl
author_facet R. Brent Tully
Ehsan Kourkchi
Hélène M. Courtois
Gagandeep S. Anand
John P. Blakeslee
Dillon Brout
Thomas de Jaeger
Alexandra Dupuy
Daniel Guinet
Cullan Howlett
Joseph B. Jensen
Daniel Pomarède
Luca Rizzi
David Rubin
Khaled Said
Daniel Scolnic
Benjamin E. Stahl
author_sort R. Brent Tully
collection DOAJ
description With Cosmicflows- 4, distances are compiled for 55,877 galaxies gathered into 38,065 groups. Eight methodologies are employed, with the largest numbers coming from the correlations between the photometric and kinematic properties of spiral galaxies (TF) and elliptical galaxies (FP). Supernovae that arise from degenerate progenitors (type Ia SNe) are an important overlapping component. Smaller contributions come from distance estimates from the surface brightness fluctuations of elliptical galaxies and the luminosities and expansion rates of core-collapse supernovae (SNe II). Cepheid period–luminosity relation and tip of the red giant branch observations founded on local stellar parallax measurements along with the geometric maser distance to NGC 4258 provide the absolute scaling of distances. The assembly of galaxies into groups is an important feature of the study in facilitating overlaps between methodologies. Merging between multiple contributions within a methodology and between methodologies is carried out with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo procedures. The final assembly of distances is compatible with a value of the Hubble constant of H _0 = 74.6 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 with the small statistical error of ±0.8 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 but a large potential systematic error of ∼3 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 . Peculiar velocities can be inferred from the measured distances. The interpretation of the field of peculiar velocities is complex because of large errors on individual components and invites analyses beyond the scope of this study.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T03:16:45Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a73a0be4bf649c4a40ef6220b818a43
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1538-4357
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T03:16:45Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Astrophysical Journal
spelling doaj.art-2a73a0be4bf649c4a40ef6220b818a432023-09-03T14:08:31ZengIOP PublishingThe Astrophysical Journal1538-43572023-01-0194419410.3847/1538-4357/ac94d8Cosmicflows-4R. Brent Tully0https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9291-1981Ehsan Kourkchi1https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5514-3354Hélène M. Courtois2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0509-1776Gagandeep S. Anand3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5259-2314John P. Blakeslee4https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5213-3548Dillon Brout5https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5201-8374Thomas de Jaeger6Alexandra Dupuy7Daniel Guinet8https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8132-6509Cullan Howlett9Joseph B. Jensen10https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8762-8906Daniel Pomarède11https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2038-0488Luca Rizzi12https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0882-2327David Rubin13https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5402-4647Khaled Said14https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1809-6325Daniel Scolnic15Benjamin E. Stahl16https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3169-3167Institute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii , 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA ; tully@ifa.hawaii.eduInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii , 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA ; tully@ifa.hawaii.eduUniversity of Lyon , UCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I Lyon, FranceSpace Telescope Science Institute , 3700 San Martin Drive, Baltimore, MD 21218, USAGemini Observatory & NSF’s NOIRLab , 950 North Cherry Avenue, Tucson, AZ 85719, USACenter for Astrophysics, Harvard & Smithsonian , 60 Garden Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USAInstitute for Astronomy, University of Hawaii , 2680 Woodlawn Drive, Honolulu, HI 96822, USA ; tully@ifa.hawaii.eduKorea Institute for Advanced Study , 85, Hoegi-ro, Dongdaemun-gu, Seoul 02455, Republic of KoreaUniversity of Lyon , UCB Lyon 1, CNRS/IN2P3, IUF, IP2I Lyon, FranceSchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, AustraliaDepartment of Physics, Utah Valley University , 800 West University Parkway, Orem, UT 84058, USAInstitut de Recherche sur les Lois Fondamentales de l’Univers, CEA Université Paris-Saclay , F-91191 Gif-sur-Yvette, FranceW.M. Keck Observatory , 65–1120 Mamalahoa Highway, Kamuela, HI 96743, USADepartment of Physics & Astronomy, University of Hawaii at Manoa , Honolulu, HI 96822, USASchool of Mathematics and Physics, The University of Queensland , Brisbane, QLD 4072, AustraliaDepartment of Physics, Duke University , Durham, NC 27708, USADepartment of Astronomy, University of California , Berkeley, CA 94720-3411, USAWith Cosmicflows- 4, distances are compiled for 55,877 galaxies gathered into 38,065 groups. Eight methodologies are employed, with the largest numbers coming from the correlations between the photometric and kinematic properties of spiral galaxies (TF) and elliptical galaxies (FP). Supernovae that arise from degenerate progenitors (type Ia SNe) are an important overlapping component. Smaller contributions come from distance estimates from the surface brightness fluctuations of elliptical galaxies and the luminosities and expansion rates of core-collapse supernovae (SNe II). Cepheid period–luminosity relation and tip of the red giant branch observations founded on local stellar parallax measurements along with the geometric maser distance to NGC 4258 provide the absolute scaling of distances. The assembly of galaxies into groups is an important feature of the study in facilitating overlaps between methodologies. Merging between multiple contributions within a methodology and between methodologies is carried out with Bayesian Markov chain Monte Carlo procedures. The final assembly of distances is compatible with a value of the Hubble constant of H _0 = 74.6 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 with the small statistical error of ±0.8 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 but a large potential systematic error of ∼3 km s ^−1 Mpc ^−1 . Peculiar velocities can be inferred from the measured distances. The interpretation of the field of peculiar velocities is complex because of large errors on individual components and invites analyses beyond the scope of this study.https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac94d8Distance indicatorsGalaxy distancesLarge-scale structure of the universeObservational cosmologyHubble constant
spellingShingle R. Brent Tully
Ehsan Kourkchi
Hélène M. Courtois
Gagandeep S. Anand
John P. Blakeslee
Dillon Brout
Thomas de Jaeger
Alexandra Dupuy
Daniel Guinet
Cullan Howlett
Joseph B. Jensen
Daniel Pomarède
Luca Rizzi
David Rubin
Khaled Said
Daniel Scolnic
Benjamin E. Stahl
Cosmicflows-4
The Astrophysical Journal
Distance indicators
Galaxy distances
Large-scale structure of the universe
Observational cosmology
Hubble constant
title Cosmicflows-4
title_full Cosmicflows-4
title_fullStr Cosmicflows-4
title_full_unstemmed Cosmicflows-4
title_short Cosmicflows-4
title_sort cosmicflows 4
topic Distance indicators
Galaxy distances
Large-scale structure of the universe
Observational cosmology
Hubble constant
url https://doi.org/10.3847/1538-4357/ac94d8
work_keys_str_mv AT rbrenttully cosmicflows4
AT ehsankourkchi cosmicflows4
AT helenemcourtois cosmicflows4
AT gagandeepsanand cosmicflows4
AT johnpblakeslee cosmicflows4
AT dillonbrout cosmicflows4
AT thomasdejaeger cosmicflows4
AT alexandradupuy cosmicflows4
AT danielguinet cosmicflows4
AT cullanhowlett cosmicflows4
AT josephbjensen cosmicflows4
AT danielpomarede cosmicflows4
AT lucarizzi cosmicflows4
AT davidrubin cosmicflows4
AT khaledsaid cosmicflows4
AT danielscolnic cosmicflows4
AT benjaminestahl cosmicflows4