A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates
This paper presents a comparative evaluation study of a newly developed mass flowmeter which combines a positive-displacement volumetric flowmeter and a densitometer, comparing its performance with a well-established Coriolis mass flow metering technology. The former which is a multiple-sensors meas...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Elsevier
2021-12-01
|
| Series: | Measurement: Sensors |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917421002841 |
| _version_ | 1818693829072519168 |
|---|---|
| author | Kar-Hooi Cheong Noriyuki Furuichi Ryouji Doihara Shouta Kamazawa Shigenori Kasai Nobuko Hosobuchi |
| author_facet | Kar-Hooi Cheong Noriyuki Furuichi Ryouji Doihara Shouta Kamazawa Shigenori Kasai Nobuko Hosobuchi |
| author_sort | Kar-Hooi Cheong |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This paper presents a comparative evaluation study of a newly developed mass flowmeter which combines a positive-displacement volumetric flowmeter and a densitometer, comparing its performance with a well-established Coriolis mass flow metering technology. The former which is a multiple-sensors measuring device shows a wider rangeability with a performance variation of within ±1 %over the whole measuring range, whereas the latter which is a single-sensor measuring device shows an excellent performance in its optimum measuring range but exhibits larger performance variation up to about±25 %near the bottom limit of its measuring range. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-17T13:19:54Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2a8643ff5c034d09815d460f2eb25469 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 2665-9174 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-17T13:19:54Z |
| publishDate | 2021-12-01 |
| publisher | Elsevier |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Measurement: Sensors |
| spelling | doaj.art-2a8643ff5c034d09815d460f2eb254692022-12-21T21:46:54ZengElsevierMeasurement: Sensors2665-91742021-12-0118100321A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow ratesKar-Hooi Cheong0Noriyuki Furuichi1Ryouji Doihara2Shouta Kamazawa3Shigenori Kasai4Nobuko Hosobuchi5Corresponding author.; National Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, 305-8563, JapanNational Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, 305-8563, JapanNational Metrology Institute of Japan (NMIJ), National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology (AIST), 1-1-1 Umezono, Tsukuba, 305-8563, JapanAtsense Inc., Akiyama Bldg. 6-10, Nishigokencho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0812, JapanAtsense Inc., Akiyama Bldg. 6-10, Nishigokencho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0812, JapanAtsense Inc., Akiyama Bldg. 6-10, Nishigokencho, Shinjuku-ku, Tokyo, 162-0812, JapanThis paper presents a comparative evaluation study of a newly developed mass flowmeter which combines a positive-displacement volumetric flowmeter and a densitometer, comparing its performance with a well-established Coriolis mass flow metering technology. The former which is a multiple-sensors measuring device shows a wider rangeability with a performance variation of within ±1 %over the whole measuring range, whereas the latter which is a single-sensor measuring device shows an excellent performance in its optimum measuring range but exhibits larger performance variation up to about±25 %near the bottom limit of its measuring range.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917421002841Mass flow measuring deviceCombination methodPositive-displacement volumetric meterDensitometerCoriolisPerformance evaluation |
| spellingShingle | Kar-Hooi Cheong Noriyuki Furuichi Ryouji Doihara Shouta Kamazawa Shigenori Kasai Nobuko Hosobuchi A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates Measurement: Sensors Mass flow measuring device Combination method Positive-displacement volumetric meter Densitometer Coriolis Performance evaluation |
| title | A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates |
| title_full | A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates |
| title_fullStr | A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates |
| title_full_unstemmed | A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates |
| title_short | A comparison between a Coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive-displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates |
| title_sort | comparison between a coriolis meter and a combination method of a volumetric positive displacement flowmeter and a densitometer in measuring liquid fuel mass flow at low flow rates |
| topic | Mass flow measuring device Combination method Positive-displacement volumetric meter Densitometer Coriolis Performance evaluation |
| url | http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2665917421002841 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT karhooicheong acomparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT noriyukifuruichi acomparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT ryoujidoihara acomparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT shoutakamazawa acomparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT shigenorikasai acomparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT nobukohosobuchi acomparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT karhooicheong comparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT noriyukifuruichi comparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT ryoujidoihara comparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT shoutakamazawa comparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT shigenorikasai comparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates AT nobukohosobuchi comparisonbetweenacoriolismeterandacombinationmethodofavolumetricpositivedisplacementflowmeterandadensitometerinmeasuringliquidfuelmassflowatlowflowrates |