Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius
In the article an attempt is made to define a possible composition of canons, upon which the popes of Rome Felix III (483-492) and Gelasius (492-496) relied condemning the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius, that lead to a long schism be-tween Rome and the Churches of the East (484-519). According...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | deu |
Published: |
Ural Federal University
2018-12-01
|
Series: | Античная древность и средние века |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/adsv/article/view/3559 |
_version_ | 1831570672551198720 |
---|---|
author | Mikhail Gratsianskiy |
author_facet | Mikhail Gratsianskiy |
author_sort | Mikhail Gratsianskiy |
collection | DOAJ |
description | In the article an attempt is made to define a possible composition of canons, upon which the popes of Rome Felix III (483-492) and Gelasius (492-496) relied condemning the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius, that lead to a long schism be-tween Rome and the Churches of the East (484-519). According to pope Gelasius the Roman position was based upon canonical ground, but he didn’t name exact canons. The author of the article defines an approximate composition of the canonical and civil law, from which the popes could theoretically draw their right to in-tervene and to judge other tenants of archiepiscopal chairs. The author comes to the conclusion that the papal position was in essence utterly uncanonical. |
first_indexed | 2024-12-17T12:55:17Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2a8c8e269b7e4ed2b0cb27331d659a17 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0320-4472 2687-0398 |
language | deu |
last_indexed | 2024-12-17T12:55:17Z |
publishDate | 2018-12-01 |
publisher | Ural Federal University |
record_format | Article |
series | Античная древность и средние века |
spelling | doaj.art-2a8c8e269b7e4ed2b0cb27331d659a172022-12-21T21:47:30ZdeuUral Federal UniversityАнтичная древность и средние века0320-44722687-03982018-12-01430628010.15826/adsv.2015.43.0032893Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople AcaciusMikhail Gratsianskiy0Московский государственный университет им. М. В. Ломоносова, МоскваIn the article an attempt is made to define a possible composition of canons, upon which the popes of Rome Felix III (483-492) and Gelasius (492-496) relied condemning the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius, that lead to a long schism be-tween Rome and the Churches of the East (484-519). According to pope Gelasius the Roman position was based upon canonical ground, but he didn’t name exact canons. The author of the article defines an approximate composition of the canonical and civil law, from which the popes could theoretically draw their right to in-tervene and to judge other tenants of archiepiscopal chairs. The author comes to the conclusion that the papal position was in essence utterly uncanonical.https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/adsv/article/view/3559папа феликс iii, папа геласий, патриарх константинопольский акакий, каноны, императорское законодательство, «акакианская схизма» |
spellingShingle | Mikhail Gratsianskiy Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius Античная древность и средние века папа феликс iii, папа геласий, патриарх константинопольский акакий, каноны, императорское законодательство, «акакианская схизма» |
title | Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius |
title_full | Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius |
title_fullStr | Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius |
title_full_unstemmed | Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius |
title_short | Canonical position of the Papacy in the Case of the Patriarch of Constantinople Acacius |
title_sort | canonical position of the papacy in the case of the patriarch of constantinople acacius |
topic | папа феликс iii, папа геласий, патриарх константинопольский акакий, каноны, императорское законодательство, «акакианская схизма» |
url | https://journals.urfu.ru/index.php/adsv/article/view/3559 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mikhailgratsianskiy canonicalpositionofthepapacyinthecaseofthepatriarchofconstantinopleacacius |