Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain

Yong Fang Zhu,1,2 Peter Kan,3 Gurmit Singh1,2 1Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 2Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 3Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Zhu YF, Kan P, Singh G
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Dove Medical Press 2022-10-01
Series:Journal of Pain Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.dovepress.com/differences-and-similarities-in-spontaneous-activity-between-animal-mo-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
_version_ 1811182347442192384
author Zhu YF
Kan P
Singh G
author_facet Zhu YF
Kan P
Singh G
author_sort Zhu YF
collection DOAJ
description Yong Fang Zhu,1,2 Peter Kan,3 Gurmit Singh1,2 1Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 2Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 3Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaCorrespondence: Gurmit Singh, Email Singhg@mcmaster.caBackground: Clinical data on cancer-induced pain (CIP) demonstrate widespread changes in sensory function. It is characterized in humans not only by stimulus-invoked pain, but also by spontaneous pain. In our previous studies in an animal model of CIP, we observed changes in intrinsic membrane properties and excitability of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sensory neurons corresponding to mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, of which abnormal activities of Aβ-fiber sensory neurons are consistent in a rat model of peripheral neuropathic pain (NEP).Objective: To investigate whether there are related peripheral neural mechanisms between the CIP and NEP models of spontaneous pain, we compared the electrophysiological properties of DRG sensory neurons at 2– 3 weeks after CIP and NEP model induction.Methods: CIP models were induced with metastasis tumour-1 rat breast cancer cells implanted into the distal epiphysis of the femur. NEP models were induced with a polyethylene cuff implanted around the sciatic nerve. Spontaneous pain in animals is measured by spontaneous foot lifting (SFL). After measurement of SFL, the animals were prepared for electrophysiological recordings of spontaneous activity (SA) in DRG neurons in vivo.Results: Our data showed that SFL and SA occurred in both models. The proportion of SFL and SA of C-fiber sensory neurons in CIP was more significantly increased than in NEP models. There was no difference in duration of SFL and the rate of SA between the two models. The duration of SFL is related to the rate of SA in C-fiber in both models.Conclusion: Thus, SFL may result from SA activity in C-fiber neurons in CIP and NEP rats. The differences and similarities in spontaneous pain between CIP and NEP rats is related to the proportion and rate of SA in C-fibers, respectively.Keywords: electrophysiology recording, spontaneous pain, sensory neuron, cancer-induced pain, neuropathic pain
first_indexed 2024-04-11T09:31:00Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2a92a2b691744c648f1391acd127c4c1
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1178-7090
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T09:31:00Z
publishDate 2022-10-01
publisher Dove Medical Press
record_format Article
series Journal of Pain Research
spelling doaj.art-2a92a2b691744c648f1391acd127c4c12022-12-22T04:31:53ZengDove Medical PressJournal of Pain Research1178-70902022-10-01Volume 153179318778901Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic PainZhu YFKan PSingh GYong Fang Zhu,1,2 Peter Kan,3 Gurmit Singh1,2 1Michael G. DeGroote Institute for Pain Research and Care, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 2Department of Pathology & Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, Canada; 3Health Sciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON, CanadaCorrespondence: Gurmit Singh, Email Singhg@mcmaster.caBackground: Clinical data on cancer-induced pain (CIP) demonstrate widespread changes in sensory function. It is characterized in humans not only by stimulus-invoked pain, but also by spontaneous pain. In our previous studies in an animal model of CIP, we observed changes in intrinsic membrane properties and excitability of dorsal root ganglion (DRG) sensory neurons corresponding to mechanical allodynia and hyperalgesia, of which abnormal activities of Aβ-fiber sensory neurons are consistent in a rat model of peripheral neuropathic pain (NEP).Objective: To investigate whether there are related peripheral neural mechanisms between the CIP and NEP models of spontaneous pain, we compared the electrophysiological properties of DRG sensory neurons at 2– 3 weeks after CIP and NEP model induction.Methods: CIP models were induced with metastasis tumour-1 rat breast cancer cells implanted into the distal epiphysis of the femur. NEP models were induced with a polyethylene cuff implanted around the sciatic nerve. Spontaneous pain in animals is measured by spontaneous foot lifting (SFL). After measurement of SFL, the animals were prepared for electrophysiological recordings of spontaneous activity (SA) in DRG neurons in vivo.Results: Our data showed that SFL and SA occurred in both models. The proportion of SFL and SA of C-fiber sensory neurons in CIP was more significantly increased than in NEP models. There was no difference in duration of SFL and the rate of SA between the two models. The duration of SFL is related to the rate of SA in C-fiber in both models.Conclusion: Thus, SFL may result from SA activity in C-fiber neurons in CIP and NEP rats. The differences and similarities in spontaneous pain between CIP and NEP rats is related to the proportion and rate of SA in C-fibers, respectively.Keywords: electrophysiology recording, spontaneous pain, sensory neuron, cancer-induced pain, neuropathic painhttps://www.dovepress.com/differences-and-similarities-in-spontaneous-activity-between-animal-mo-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPRelectrophysiology recordingspontaneous painsensory neuroncancer-induced painneuropathic pain
spellingShingle Zhu YF
Kan P
Singh G
Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain
Journal of Pain Research
electrophysiology recording
spontaneous pain
sensory neuron
cancer-induced pain
neuropathic pain
title Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain
title_full Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain
title_fullStr Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain
title_full_unstemmed Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain
title_short Differences and Similarities in Spontaneous Activity Between Animal Models of Cancer-Induced Pain and Neuropathic Pain
title_sort differences and similarities in spontaneous activity between animal models of cancer induced pain and neuropathic pain
topic electrophysiology recording
spontaneous pain
sensory neuron
cancer-induced pain
neuropathic pain
url https://www.dovepress.com/differences-and-similarities-in-spontaneous-activity-between-animal-mo-peer-reviewed-fulltext-article-JPR
work_keys_str_mv AT zhuyf differencesandsimilaritiesinspontaneousactivitybetweenanimalmodelsofcancerinducedpainandneuropathicpain
AT kanp differencesandsimilaritiesinspontaneousactivitybetweenanimalmodelsofcancerinducedpainandneuropathicpain
AT singhg differencesandsimilaritiesinspontaneousactivitybetweenanimalmodelsofcancerinducedpainandneuropathicpain