Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance

IntroductionDifficult choices between two equally attractive options result in a cognitive discrepancy between dissonant cognitions such as preferences and actions often followed by a sense of psychological discomfort known as cognitive dissonance. It can lead to changes in the desirability of optio...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Elena Rybina, Marco Colosio, Anna Shestakova, Vasily Klucharev
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Frontiers Media S.A. 2023-12-01
Series:Frontiers in Psychology
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410/full
_version_ 1797387309669154816
author Elena Rybina
Marco Colosio
Anna Shestakova
Vasily Klucharev
author_facet Elena Rybina
Marco Colosio
Anna Shestakova
Vasily Klucharev
author_sort Elena Rybina
collection DOAJ
description IntroductionDifficult choices between two equally attractive options result in a cognitive discrepancy between dissonant cognitions such as preferences and actions often followed by a sense of psychological discomfort known as cognitive dissonance. It can lead to changes in the desirability of options: the chosen option becomes more desirable, whereas the rejected option is devalued. Despite the ample experimental evidence to show this effect, the neural mechanisms and timing of such choice-induced preference changes are not fully understood.MethodsIn this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate the activity of the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), which has been associated with conflict monitoring and choice-induced preference changes in neuroimaging studies. Prior to a revised version of Brehm’s free-choice paradigm, participants in two experiments underwent cathodal (inhibitory) or anodal (excitatory) tDCS of the pMFC compared to sham (placebo) stimulation prior to the choice phase.ResultsOur results showed that cathodal tDCS significantly decreased the choice-induced preference change relative to a sham, but only in direct comparisons of rejected options. No significant effect of anodal tDCS in comparison with sham was observed.DiscussionThis study replicates the general behavioral effect of cognitive dissonance and provide partial support for the theory of the pMFC contribution to choice-related cognitive dissonance and subsequent preference changes, with possible limitations of an under-sampling for the obtained effect size and an asymmetry in the inhibitory-excitatory effects of non-invasive tDCS.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T22:22:21Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2aafc19ffbe4483cbf7cbf21d60c13aa
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1664-1078
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T22:22:21Z
publishDate 2023-12-01
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format Article
series Frontiers in Psychology
spelling doaj.art-2aafc19ffbe4483cbf7cbf21d60c13aa2023-12-18T12:42:22ZengFrontiers Media S.A.Frontiers in Psychology1664-10782023-12-011410.3389/fpsyg.2023.11044101104410Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonanceElena RybinaMarco ColosioAnna ShestakovaVasily KlucharevIntroductionDifficult choices between two equally attractive options result in a cognitive discrepancy between dissonant cognitions such as preferences and actions often followed by a sense of psychological discomfort known as cognitive dissonance. It can lead to changes in the desirability of options: the chosen option becomes more desirable, whereas the rejected option is devalued. Despite the ample experimental evidence to show this effect, the neural mechanisms and timing of such choice-induced preference changes are not fully understood.MethodsIn this study, we used transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) to modulate the activity of the posterior medial frontal cortex (pMFC), which has been associated with conflict monitoring and choice-induced preference changes in neuroimaging studies. Prior to a revised version of Brehm’s free-choice paradigm, participants in two experiments underwent cathodal (inhibitory) or anodal (excitatory) tDCS of the pMFC compared to sham (placebo) stimulation prior to the choice phase.ResultsOur results showed that cathodal tDCS significantly decreased the choice-induced preference change relative to a sham, but only in direct comparisons of rejected options. No significant effect of anodal tDCS in comparison with sham was observed.DiscussionThis study replicates the general behavioral effect of cognitive dissonance and provide partial support for the theory of the pMFC contribution to choice-related cognitive dissonance and subsequent preference changes, with possible limitations of an under-sampling for the obtained effect size and an asymmetry in the inhibitory-excitatory effects of non-invasive tDCS.https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410/fullcognitive dissonancedecision makingpreference changesmedial frontal cortex (MFC)transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)free choice paradigm
spellingShingle Elena Rybina
Marco Colosio
Anna Shestakova
Vasily Klucharev
Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance
Frontiers in Psychology
cognitive dissonance
decision making
preference changes
medial frontal cortex (MFC)
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
free choice paradigm
title Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance
title_full Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance
title_fullStr Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance
title_full_unstemmed Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance
title_short Neuromodulation of choice-induced preference changes: the tDCS study of cognitive dissonance
title_sort neuromodulation of choice induced preference changes the tdcs study of cognitive dissonance
topic cognitive dissonance
decision making
preference changes
medial frontal cortex (MFC)
transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS)
free choice paradigm
url https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1104410/full
work_keys_str_mv AT elenarybina neuromodulationofchoiceinducedpreferencechangesthetdcsstudyofcognitivedissonance
AT marcocolosio neuromodulationofchoiceinducedpreferencechangesthetdcsstudyofcognitivedissonance
AT annashestakova neuromodulationofchoiceinducedpreferencechangesthetdcsstudyofcognitivedissonance
AT vasilyklucharev neuromodulationofchoiceinducedpreferencechangesthetdcsstudyofcognitivedissonance