Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies

Sixty undergraduate students made category membership decisions for each of 132 candidate exemplar-category name pairs (e.g., chess – Sports) in each of two separate sessions. They were frequently inconsistent from one session to the next, both for nominal categories such as Sports and Fish, and ad...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Steven Verheyen, Anne White, Paul Égré
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: The MIT Press 2019-06-01
Series:Open Mind
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00025
_version_ 1811282128876339200
author Steven Verheyen
Anne White
Paul Égré
author_facet Steven Verheyen
Anne White
Paul Égré
author_sort Steven Verheyen
collection DOAJ
description Sixty undergraduate students made category membership decisions for each of 132 candidate exemplar-category name pairs (e.g., chess – Sports) in each of two separate sessions. They were frequently inconsistent from one session to the next, both for nominal categories such as Sports and Fish, and ad hoc categories such as Things You Rescue from a Burning House. A mixture model analysis revealed that several of these inconsistencies could be attributed to criterial vagueness: participants adopting different criteria for membership in the two sessions. This finding indicates that categorization is a probabilistic process, whereby the conditions for applying a category label are not invariant. Individuals have various functional meanings of nominal categories at their disposal and entertain competing goals for ad hoc categories.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T01:46:08Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2abda50f8a7148e18bf7bfd4fb7ae335
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2470-2986
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T01:46:08Z
publishDate 2019-06-01
publisher The MIT Press
record_format Article
series Open Mind
spelling doaj.art-2abda50f8a7148e18bf7bfd4fb7ae3352022-12-22T03:08:01ZengThe MIT PressOpen Mind2470-29862019-06-013415110.1162/opmi_a_00025opmi_a_00025Revealing Criterial Vagueness in InconsistenciesSteven Verheyen0Anne White1Paul Égré2Laboratoire de Sciences Cognitives et Psycholinguistique, Département d’études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRSLaboratory for Experimental Psychology, Faculty of Psychology and Educational Sciences, KU LeuvenInstitut Jean Nicod, Département d’études cognitives, ENS, EHESS, PSL University, CNRSSixty undergraduate students made category membership decisions for each of 132 candidate exemplar-category name pairs (e.g., chess – Sports) in each of two separate sessions. They were frequently inconsistent from one session to the next, both for nominal categories such as Sports and Fish, and ad hoc categories such as Things You Rescue from a Burning House. A mixture model analysis revealed that several of these inconsistencies could be attributed to criterial vagueness: participants adopting different criteria for membership in the two sessions. This finding indicates that categorization is a probabilistic process, whereby the conditions for applying a category label are not invariant. Individuals have various functional meanings of nominal categories at their disposal and entertain competing goals for ad hoc categories.https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00025categorizationvaguenessindividual differencessemantic memoryad hoc categories
spellingShingle Steven Verheyen
Anne White
Paul Égré
Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies
Open Mind
categorization
vagueness
individual differences
semantic memory
ad hoc categories
title Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies
title_full Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies
title_fullStr Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies
title_full_unstemmed Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies
title_short Revealing Criterial Vagueness in Inconsistencies
title_sort revealing criterial vagueness in inconsistencies
topic categorization
vagueness
individual differences
semantic memory
ad hoc categories
url https://www.mitpressjournals.org/doi/pdf/10.1162/opmi_a_00025
work_keys_str_mv AT stevenverheyen revealingcriterialvaguenessininconsistencies
AT annewhite revealingcriterialvaguenessininconsistencies
AT paulegre revealingcriterialvaguenessininconsistencies