Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond
Due to their self-reflexive propensity, postmodern fiction and metafiction, in particular, have been relentlessly criticized of solipsism and of an indifference to relate to the extralinguistic world. While the novel is deemed to pause in its trajectory to examine itself, to examine its conventions...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
University of Zadar
2011-12-01
|
| Series: | [sic] |
| Online Access: | http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=87 |
| _version_ | 1827221370179682304 |
|---|---|
| author | Lissi Athanasiou Krikelis |
| author_facet | Lissi Athanasiou Krikelis |
| author_sort | Lissi Athanasiou Krikelis |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | Due to their self-reflexive propensity, postmodern fiction and metafiction, in particular, have been relentlessly criticized of solipsism and of an indifference to relate to the extralinguistic world. While the novel is deemed to pause in its trajectory to examine itself, to examine its conventions and rejections of them, to address its future uncertainties and its at-present struggles, it has become a misprision that all it can bestow to its readers is an understanding of itself. The basic argument unravels as follows: language is devoid of reality, therefore, literature does not contain reality either; now more than ever, fiction recognizes that it is a self-contained artifact which can only engage in a representation of itself, having no interest in proffering its readers anything but an understanding of itself. The novel in the postmodern period has faced the crisis of representation, when linguists and theorists alike unmask the insufficiency of language and its inability to represent reality. Under the scrutiny of language, metafiction emerges; a fiction which is more than ever aware of the inadequacies of its medium, and which is conscious of its subsequent inability to represent the world; hence the conclusions that all its pronouncements can only be about itself. This view delimits the possibilities of (meta)fiction, whose nature is apparently more intricate: while recognizing the distance between itself and reality, while shifting the emphasis from reality to itself, literature can never only be about itself; even if it attempts to repudiate the world, the world will forever be part of what makes literature possible. |
| first_indexed | 2024-03-08T20:00:53Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2abf277b01a348febaeca0929c082464 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1847-7755 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2025-03-21T16:21:31Z |
| publishDate | 2011-12-01 |
| publisher | University of Zadar |
| record_format | Article |
| series | [sic] |
| spelling | doaj.art-2abf277b01a348febaeca0929c0824642024-06-17T12:07:17ZengUniversity of Zadar[sic]1847-77552011-12-012110.15291/sic/1.2.lc.387Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World BeyondLissi Athanasiou KrikelisDue to their self-reflexive propensity, postmodern fiction and metafiction, in particular, have been relentlessly criticized of solipsism and of an indifference to relate to the extralinguistic world. While the novel is deemed to pause in its trajectory to examine itself, to examine its conventions and rejections of them, to address its future uncertainties and its at-present struggles, it has become a misprision that all it can bestow to its readers is an understanding of itself. The basic argument unravels as follows: language is devoid of reality, therefore, literature does not contain reality either; now more than ever, fiction recognizes that it is a self-contained artifact which can only engage in a representation of itself, having no interest in proffering its readers anything but an understanding of itself. The novel in the postmodern period has faced the crisis of representation, when linguists and theorists alike unmask the insufficiency of language and its inability to represent reality. Under the scrutiny of language, metafiction emerges; a fiction which is more than ever aware of the inadequacies of its medium, and which is conscious of its subsequent inability to represent the world; hence the conclusions that all its pronouncements can only be about itself. This view delimits the possibilities of (meta)fiction, whose nature is apparently more intricate: while recognizing the distance between itself and reality, while shifting the emphasis from reality to itself, literature can never only be about itself; even if it attempts to repudiate the world, the world will forever be part of what makes literature possible.http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=87 |
| spellingShingle | Lissi Athanasiou Krikelis Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond [sic] |
| title | Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond |
| title_full | Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond |
| title_fullStr | Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond |
| title_full_unstemmed | Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond |
| title_short | Speaking and Remaining Silent about the World Beyond |
| title_sort | speaking and remaining silent about the world beyond |
| url | http://www.sic-journal.org/ArticleView.aspx?aid=87 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT lissiathanasioukrikelis speakingandremainingsilentabouttheworldbeyond |