Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts.
We assessed the accuracy of species-level identification of two commercially available matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems (Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS) and two conventional phenotypic methods (Phoenix 100 YBC and Vitek 2 Yeast ID) wit...
| Main Authors: | , , , , , , |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Public Library of Science (PLoS)
2014-01-01
|
| Series: | PLoS ONE |
| Online Access: | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4199611?pdf=render |
| _version_ | 1818578597230673920 |
|---|---|
| author | Qiao-Ting Chao Tai-Fen Lee Shih-Hua Teng Li-Yun Peng Ping-Hung Chen Lee-Jene Teng Po-Ren Hsueh |
| author_facet | Qiao-Ting Chao Tai-Fen Lee Shih-Hua Teng Li-Yun Peng Ping-Hung Chen Lee-Jene Teng Po-Ren Hsueh |
| author_sort | Qiao-Ting Chao |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | We assessed the accuracy of species-level identification of two commercially available matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems (Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS) and two conventional phenotypic methods (Phoenix 100 YBC and Vitek 2 Yeast ID) with that of rDNA gene sequencing analysis among 200 clinical isolates of commonly encountered yeasts. The correct identification rates of the 200 yeast isolates to species or complex (Candida parapsilosis complex, C. guilliermondii complex and C. rugosa complex) levels by the Bruker Biotyper, Vitek MS (using in vitro devices [IVD] database), Phoenix 100 YBC and Vitek 2 Yeast ID (Sabouraud's dextrose agar) systems were 92.5%, 79.5%, 89%, and 74%, respectively. An additional 72 isolates of C. parapsilosis complex and 18 from the above 200 isolates (30 in each of C. parapsilosis, C. metapsilosis, and C. orthopsilosis) were also evaluated separately. Bruker Biotyper system could accurately identify all C. parapsilosis complex to species level. Using Vitek 2 MS (IVD) system, all C. parapsilosis but none of C. metapsilosis, or C. orthopsilosis could be accurately identified. Among the 89 yeasts misidentified by the Vitek 2 MS (IVD) system, 39 (43.8%), including 27 C. orthopsilosis isolates, could be correctly identified Using the Vitek MS Plus SARAMIS database for research use only. This resulted in an increase in the rate of correct identification of all yeast isolates (87.5%) by Vitek 2 MS. The two species in C. guilliermondii complex (C. guilliermondii and C. fermentati) isolates were correctly identified by cluster analysis of spectra generated by the Bruker Biotyper system. Based on the results obtained in the current study, MALDI-TOF MS systems present a promising alternative for the routine identification of yeast species, including clinically commonly and rarely encountered yeast species and several species belonging to C. parapsilosis complex, C. guilliermondii complex, and C. rugosa complex. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-16T06:48:20Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2acbc1a3d431475a9302c06d41e66ad6 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1932-6203 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-16T06:48:20Z |
| publishDate | 2014-01-01 |
| publisher | Public Library of Science (PLoS) |
| record_format | Article |
| series | PLoS ONE |
| spelling | doaj.art-2acbc1a3d431475a9302c06d41e66ad62022-12-21T22:40:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032014-01-01910e10937610.1371/journal.pone.0109376Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts.Qiao-Ting ChaoTai-Fen LeeShih-Hua TengLi-Yun PengPing-Hung ChenLee-Jene TengPo-Ren HsuehWe assessed the accuracy of species-level identification of two commercially available matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) systems (Bruker Biotyper and Vitek MS) and two conventional phenotypic methods (Phoenix 100 YBC and Vitek 2 Yeast ID) with that of rDNA gene sequencing analysis among 200 clinical isolates of commonly encountered yeasts. The correct identification rates of the 200 yeast isolates to species or complex (Candida parapsilosis complex, C. guilliermondii complex and C. rugosa complex) levels by the Bruker Biotyper, Vitek MS (using in vitro devices [IVD] database), Phoenix 100 YBC and Vitek 2 Yeast ID (Sabouraud's dextrose agar) systems were 92.5%, 79.5%, 89%, and 74%, respectively. An additional 72 isolates of C. parapsilosis complex and 18 from the above 200 isolates (30 in each of C. parapsilosis, C. metapsilosis, and C. orthopsilosis) were also evaluated separately. Bruker Biotyper system could accurately identify all C. parapsilosis complex to species level. Using Vitek 2 MS (IVD) system, all C. parapsilosis but none of C. metapsilosis, or C. orthopsilosis could be accurately identified. Among the 89 yeasts misidentified by the Vitek 2 MS (IVD) system, 39 (43.8%), including 27 C. orthopsilosis isolates, could be correctly identified Using the Vitek MS Plus SARAMIS database for research use only. This resulted in an increase in the rate of correct identification of all yeast isolates (87.5%) by Vitek 2 MS. The two species in C. guilliermondii complex (C. guilliermondii and C. fermentati) isolates were correctly identified by cluster analysis of spectra generated by the Bruker Biotyper system. Based on the results obtained in the current study, MALDI-TOF MS systems present a promising alternative for the routine identification of yeast species, including clinically commonly and rarely encountered yeast species and several species belonging to C. parapsilosis complex, C. guilliermondii complex, and C. rugosa complex.http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4199611?pdf=render |
| spellingShingle | Qiao-Ting Chao Tai-Fen Lee Shih-Hua Teng Li-Yun Peng Ping-Hung Chen Lee-Jene Teng Po-Ren Hsueh Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. PLoS ONE |
| title | Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. |
| title_full | Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. |
| title_fullStr | Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. |
| title_short | Comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two MALDI-TOF MS systems with that of DNA sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts. |
| title_sort | comparison of the accuracy of two conventional phenotypic methods and two maldi tof ms systems with that of dna sequencing analysis for correctly identifying clinically encountered yeasts |
| url | http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4199611?pdf=render |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT qiaotingchao comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts AT taifenlee comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts AT shihhuateng comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts AT liyunpeng comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts AT pinghungchen comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts AT leejeneteng comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts AT porenhsueh comparisonoftheaccuracyoftwoconventionalphenotypicmethodsandtwomalditofmssystemswiththatofdnasequencinganalysisforcorrectlyidentifyingclinicallyencounteredyeasts |