Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities

Digital technologies are increasingly being incorporated in the management and governance of urban forests to provide the information needed for sustainable and more livable cities. However, there is scarce information on the documented lessons from applying these digital technologies for urban fore...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Sylvester Ngome Chisika, Chunho Yeom
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SAGE Publishing 2023-09-01
Series:SAGE Open
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194137
_version_ 1797691620376707072
author Sylvester Ngome Chisika
Chunho Yeom
author_facet Sylvester Ngome Chisika
Chunho Yeom
author_sort Sylvester Ngome Chisika
collection DOAJ
description Digital technologies are increasingly being incorporated in the management and governance of urban forests to provide the information needed for sustainable and more livable cities. However, there is scarce information on the documented lessons from applying these digital technologies for urban forestry management in many developing countries. This study addressed this challenge using a literature review in the case of Nairobi, Kenya, and Kampala, Uganda. The results substantiate that urban forests are important city assets enhancing ecological stability and sustainable development. As such, the digital technologies of urban forest management practices are rapidly expanding in the two cities to enhance urban forestry and create new opportunities for sustainable development. Both cities have differentiated integration of digital technologies in the vegetative, community support, and resource management components of urban forest governance and management, with important information and lessons being generated for city authorities and policymakers. In general, the technology implementation level in Kampala city is higher than in Nairobi City. This differentiation could be attributed to differences in the socio-political contexts of the two cities, which present different enablers and barriers to technology application in urban forestry. Nevertheless, more location-specific practices and experiences with a focus on how to diversify opinions and actors in digital technologies should be pursued.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T02:15:51Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ae80f7c1cb747f28a0abb15bd92d151
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2158-2440
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T02:15:51Z
publishDate 2023-09-01
publisher SAGE Publishing
record_format Article
series SAGE Open
spelling doaj.art-2ae80f7c1cb747f28a0abb15bd92d1512023-09-06T08:33:22ZengSAGE PublishingSAGE Open2158-24402023-09-011310.1177/21582440231194137Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala CitiesSylvester Ngome Chisika0Chunho Yeom1University of Seoul, South KoreaUniversity of Seoul, South KoreaDigital technologies are increasingly being incorporated in the management and governance of urban forests to provide the information needed for sustainable and more livable cities. However, there is scarce information on the documented lessons from applying these digital technologies for urban forestry management in many developing countries. This study addressed this challenge using a literature review in the case of Nairobi, Kenya, and Kampala, Uganda. The results substantiate that urban forests are important city assets enhancing ecological stability and sustainable development. As such, the digital technologies of urban forest management practices are rapidly expanding in the two cities to enhance urban forestry and create new opportunities for sustainable development. Both cities have differentiated integration of digital technologies in the vegetative, community support, and resource management components of urban forest governance and management, with important information and lessons being generated for city authorities and policymakers. In general, the technology implementation level in Kampala city is higher than in Nairobi City. This differentiation could be attributed to differences in the socio-political contexts of the two cities, which present different enablers and barriers to technology application in urban forestry. Nevertheless, more location-specific practices and experiences with a focus on how to diversify opinions and actors in digital technologies should be pursued.https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194137
spellingShingle Sylvester Ngome Chisika
Chunho Yeom
Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities
SAGE Open
title Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities
title_full Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities
title_fullStr Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities
title_full_unstemmed Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities
title_short Smart Urban Forest Management in East Africa: The Case of Nairobi and Kampala Cities
title_sort smart urban forest management in east africa the case of nairobi and kampala cities
url https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440231194137
work_keys_str_mv AT sylvesterngomechisika smarturbanforestmanagementineastafricathecaseofnairobiandkampalacities
AT chunhoyeom smarturbanforestmanagementineastafricathecaseofnairobiandkampalacities