It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites

Studies have produced vastly disparate findings when exploring relationships between social networking site (SNS) usage and psychosocial well-being. These inconsistencies might reflect a lack of consideration for how people use SNS; specifically, while meaningful interactions are suggested to foster...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Daniel J. Shaw, Linda K. Kaye, Nicola Ngombe, Klaus Kessler, Charlotte R. Pennington
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Public Library of Science (PLoS) 2022-01-01
Series:PLoS ONE
Online Access:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728879/?tool=EBI
_version_ 1811184512362610688
author Daniel J. Shaw
Linda K. Kaye
Nicola Ngombe
Klaus Kessler
Charlotte R. Pennington
author_facet Daniel J. Shaw
Linda K. Kaye
Nicola Ngombe
Klaus Kessler
Charlotte R. Pennington
author_sort Daniel J. Shaw
collection DOAJ
description Studies have produced vastly disparate findings when exploring relationships between social networking site (SNS) usage and psychosocial well-being. These inconsistencies might reflect a lack of consideration for how people use SNS; specifically, while meaningful interactions are suggested to foster positive feelings, the passive consumption of others’ feeds is proposed to have negative effects on users’ well-being. To facilitate the empirical evaluation of these claims, the present study developed a computerised task to measure styles of usage on a mock SNS platform. Administering this Social Network Site Behaviour Task (SNSBT) online to 526 individuals, we identified three dissociable usage styles that extend the active-passive dichotomy employed frequently in the literature: passive use (consuming content posted by others), reactive use (reacting to others’ content), and interactive use (interacting with others through content sharing). Furthermore, our data reveal that these usage styles differ on several measures of psychosocial variables employed frequently in the disparate literature: more interactive users reported greater feelings of social connectedness and social capital than passive or reactive users. Importantly, however, our results also reveal the multi-dimensional nature of usage styles, with online network size and time spent on SNS platforms serving as potentially confounding influences on some psychosocial measures. These findings not only advance our understanding of SNS behaviour by providing empirical support for theoretic propositions, but also demonstrate the utility of the SNSBT for experimental investigations into the psychosocial outcomes of different SNS usage styles.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T13:13:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2afae75302014a128b7d58ad0c4e773f
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1932-6203
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T13:13:24Z
publishDate 2022-01-01
publisher Public Library of Science (PLoS)
record_format Article
series PLoS ONE
spelling doaj.art-2afae75302014a128b7d58ad0c4e773f2022-12-22T04:22:28ZengPublic Library of Science (PLoS)PLoS ONE1932-62032022-01-011712It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sitesDaniel J. ShawLinda K. KayeNicola NgombeKlaus KesslerCharlotte R. PenningtonStudies have produced vastly disparate findings when exploring relationships between social networking site (SNS) usage and psychosocial well-being. These inconsistencies might reflect a lack of consideration for how people use SNS; specifically, while meaningful interactions are suggested to foster positive feelings, the passive consumption of others’ feeds is proposed to have negative effects on users’ well-being. To facilitate the empirical evaluation of these claims, the present study developed a computerised task to measure styles of usage on a mock SNS platform. Administering this Social Network Site Behaviour Task (SNSBT) online to 526 individuals, we identified three dissociable usage styles that extend the active-passive dichotomy employed frequently in the literature: passive use (consuming content posted by others), reactive use (reacting to others’ content), and interactive use (interacting with others through content sharing). Furthermore, our data reveal that these usage styles differ on several measures of psychosocial variables employed frequently in the disparate literature: more interactive users reported greater feelings of social connectedness and social capital than passive or reactive users. Importantly, however, our results also reveal the multi-dimensional nature of usage styles, with online network size and time spent on SNS platforms serving as potentially confounding influences on some psychosocial measures. These findings not only advance our understanding of SNS behaviour by providing empirical support for theoretic propositions, but also demonstrate the utility of the SNSBT for experimental investigations into the psychosocial outcomes of different SNS usage styles.https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728879/?tool=EBI
spellingShingle Daniel J. Shaw
Linda K. Kaye
Nicola Ngombe
Klaus Kessler
Charlotte R. Pennington
It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
PLoS ONE
title It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
title_full It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
title_fullStr It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
title_full_unstemmed It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
title_short It’s not what you do, it’s the way that you do it: An experimental task delineates among passive, reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
title_sort it s not what you do it s the way that you do it an experimental task delineates among passive reactive and interactive styles of behaviour on social networking sites
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC9728879/?tool=EBI
work_keys_str_mv AT danieljshaw itsnotwhatyoudoitsthewaythatyoudoitanexperimentaltaskdelineatesamongpassivereactiveandinteractivestylesofbehaviouronsocialnetworkingsites
AT lindakkaye itsnotwhatyoudoitsthewaythatyoudoitanexperimentaltaskdelineatesamongpassivereactiveandinteractivestylesofbehaviouronsocialnetworkingsites
AT nicolangombe itsnotwhatyoudoitsthewaythatyoudoitanexperimentaltaskdelineatesamongpassivereactiveandinteractivestylesofbehaviouronsocialnetworkingsites
AT klauskessler itsnotwhatyoudoitsthewaythatyoudoitanexperimentaltaskdelineatesamongpassivereactiveandinteractivestylesofbehaviouronsocialnetworkingsites
AT charlotterpennington itsnotwhatyoudoitsthewaythatyoudoitanexperimentaltaskdelineatesamongpassivereactiveandinteractivestylesofbehaviouronsocialnetworkingsites