On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength

Ganymede is the only moon in our solar system known to have a large-scale intrinsic magnetic field, likely generated in the moon’s metallic core. Initial analyses of Galileo spacecraft measurements concluded that Ganymede’s intrinsic magnetic field is dominated by a magnetic dipole and that quadrupo...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: A. M. Plattner, C. L. Johnson, M. J. Styczinski, S. D. Vance, A. C. Mills
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2023-01-01
Series:The Planetary Science Journal
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acde7f
_version_ 1827392119390601216
author A. M. Plattner
C. L. Johnson
M. J. Styczinski
S. D. Vance
A. C. Mills
author_facet A. M. Plattner
C. L. Johnson
M. J. Styczinski
S. D. Vance
A. C. Mills
author_sort A. M. Plattner
collection DOAJ
description Ganymede is the only moon in our solar system known to have a large-scale intrinsic magnetic field, likely generated in the moon’s metallic core. Initial analyses of Galileo spacecraft measurements concluded that Ganymede’s intrinsic magnetic field is dominated by a magnetic dipole and that quadrupolar contributions are exceptionally weak. These findings have influenced the development of models for Ganymede’s core dynamo over the past two decades, some concluding that Ganymede’s dynamo is limited to the innermost part of Ganymede’s core. Here, we reassess Ganymede’s internal field contributions based on the magnetic measurements from close Galileo flybys of Ganymede (G1, G2, G7, G8, G28, and G29), adding the recent Juno flyby. We find that presently available data cannot constrain Ganymede’s quadrupole moment, as we demonstrate by constructing models with a range of quadrupole moments, including relative values comparable to those at the Earth. As a consequence, global analysis of available data cannot constrain the spatial limits of Ganymede’s core dynamo. Incorporating ocean induction for a range of Ganymede ocean models indicates that ocean induction may be present, but that available magnetic data cannot discern between end-member cases for Ganymede ocean models.
first_indexed 2024-03-08T17:25:24Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2afb59d269ac4d299d8f04cbf0751e0b
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2632-3338
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-08T17:25:24Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series The Planetary Science Journal
spelling doaj.art-2afb59d269ac4d299d8f04cbf0751e0b2024-01-02T19:53:25ZengIOP PublishingThe Planetary Science Journal2632-33382023-01-014713410.3847/PSJ/acde7fOn Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar StrengthA. M. Plattner0https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5154-1833C. L. Johnson1M. J. Styczinski2https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4048-5914S. D. Vance3https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4242-3293A. C. Mills4Department of Geological Sciences, University of Alabama , Tuscaloosa, AL 35487, USA ; amplattner@ua.eduDepartment of Earth, Ocean and Atmospheric Sciences, University of British Columbia , Vancouver, BC V6T 1Z4, Canada; Planetary Science Institute , Tucson, AZ 85719, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91109, USAJet Propulsion Laboratory, California Institute of Technology , Pasadena, CA 91109, USADepartment of Geosciences, Baylor University , Waco, TX 76798, USAGanymede is the only moon in our solar system known to have a large-scale intrinsic magnetic field, likely generated in the moon’s metallic core. Initial analyses of Galileo spacecraft measurements concluded that Ganymede’s intrinsic magnetic field is dominated by a magnetic dipole and that quadrupolar contributions are exceptionally weak. These findings have influenced the development of models for Ganymede’s core dynamo over the past two decades, some concluding that Ganymede’s dynamo is limited to the innermost part of Ganymede’s core. Here, we reassess Ganymede’s internal field contributions based on the magnetic measurements from close Galileo flybys of Ganymede (G1, G2, G7, G8, G28, and G29), adding the recent Juno flyby. We find that presently available data cannot constrain Ganymede’s quadrupole moment, as we demonstrate by constructing models with a range of quadrupole moments, including relative values comparable to those at the Earth. As a consequence, global analysis of available data cannot constrain the spatial limits of Ganymede’s core dynamo. Incorporating ocean induction for a range of Ganymede ocean models indicates that ocean induction may be present, but that available magnetic data cannot discern between end-member cases for Ganymede ocean models.https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acde7fGanymedeMagnetic fieldsPlanetary cores
spellingShingle A. M. Plattner
C. L. Johnson
M. J. Styczinski
S. D. Vance
A. C. Mills
On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength
The Planetary Science Journal
Ganymede
Magnetic fields
Planetary cores
title On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength
title_full On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength
title_fullStr On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength
title_full_unstemmed On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength
title_short On Ganymede’s Magnetic Quadrupolar Strength
title_sort on ganymede s magnetic quadrupolar strength
topic Ganymede
Magnetic fields
Planetary cores
url https://doi.org/10.3847/PSJ/acde7f
work_keys_str_mv AT amplattner onganymedesmagneticquadrupolarstrength
AT cljohnson onganymedesmagneticquadrupolarstrength
AT mjstyczinski onganymedesmagneticquadrupolarstrength
AT sdvance onganymedesmagneticquadrupolarstrength
AT acmills onganymedesmagneticquadrupolarstrength