Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction

ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of two different doses of topical cyclosporine A used in addition to artificial tears in the treatment of patients with meibomian dysfunction and secondary dry eye. Methods: Fifty patients aged 18 to 40 years, who presented to our clinic between...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Kemal Bayrakceken, Adem Ugurlu
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia 2022-06-01
Series:Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802022000100221&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1829104726776479744
author Kemal Bayrakceken
Adem Ugurlu
author_facet Kemal Bayrakceken
Adem Ugurlu
author_sort Kemal Bayrakceken
collection DOAJ
description ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of two different doses of topical cyclosporine A used in addition to artificial tears in the treatment of patients with meibomian dysfunction and secondary dry eye. Methods: Fifty patients aged 18 to 40 years, who presented to our clinic between June 2020 and June 2021 were included in our study. Patients were divided into two groups as Group A (topical cyclosporine A 0.05%) and Group B (topical cyclosporine A 0.1%). All the patients underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination, basal Ocular Surface Disease Index measurement, and Schirmer 1 and tear break-up time tests at all visits. Results: The mean age was 32±7.1 years in Group A and 30.7±8.5 years in Group B. In Group A, there were 15 women and ten men, and Group B consisted of 14 women and 11 men. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender distribution (p>0.05). Schirmer 1 and tear break-up time results and Ocular Surface Disease Index score also did not significantly differ between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Cyclosporine A 0.05% and 0.1% eye drops were both seen to be effective in managing dry eye disease in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction.
first_indexed 2024-12-12T05:53:40Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2b031816153a45e98970be0aaccf5758
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1982-8551
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-12T05:53:40Z
publishDate 2022-06-01
publisher Sociedade Brasileira de Oftalmologia
record_format Article
series Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
spelling doaj.art-2b031816153a45e98970be0aaccf57582022-12-22T00:35:37ZengSociedade Brasileira de OftalmologiaRevista Brasileira de Oftalmologia1982-85512022-06-018110.37039/1982.8551.20220044Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunctionKemal Bayrakcekenhttps://orcid.org/0000-0001-9550-1358Adem Ugurluhttps://orcid.org/0000-0002-8900-7043ABSTRACT Objective: To compare the clinical efficacy of two different doses of topical cyclosporine A used in addition to artificial tears in the treatment of patients with meibomian dysfunction and secondary dry eye. Methods: Fifty patients aged 18 to 40 years, who presented to our clinic between June 2020 and June 2021 were included in our study. Patients were divided into two groups as Group A (topical cyclosporine A 0.05%) and Group B (topical cyclosporine A 0.1%). All the patients underwent a detailed ophthalmological examination, basal Ocular Surface Disease Index measurement, and Schirmer 1 and tear break-up time tests at all visits. Results: The mean age was 32±7.1 years in Group A and 30.7±8.5 years in Group B. In Group A, there were 15 women and ten men, and Group B consisted of 14 women and 11 men. There was no difference between the groups in terms of age and gender distribution (p>0.05). Schirmer 1 and tear break-up time results and Ocular Surface Disease Index score also did not significantly differ between the groups (p>0.05). Conclusion: Cyclosporine A 0.05% and 0.1% eye drops were both seen to be effective in managing dry eye disease in patients with meibomian gland dysfunction.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802022000100221&lng=en&tlng=enCyclosporineDry eye syndromeTear function test
spellingShingle Kemal Bayrakceken
Adem Ugurlu
Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
Revista Brasileira de Oftalmologia
Cyclosporine
Dry eye syndrome
Tear function test
title Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
title_full Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
title_fullStr Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
title_short Comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses (0.05% and 0.1%) of topical cyclosporine A in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
title_sort comparison of the clinical effects of two different doses 0 05 and 0 1 of topical cyclosporine a in dry eyes with meibomian gland dysfunction
topic Cyclosporine
Dry eye syndrome
Tear function test
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-72802022000100221&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT kemalbayrakceken comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsoftwodifferentdoses005and01oftopicalcyclosporineaindryeyeswithmeibomianglanddysfunction
AT ademugurlu comparisonoftheclinicaleffectsoftwodifferentdoses005and01oftopicalcyclosporineaindryeyeswithmeibomianglanddysfunction