Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures

A general evaluation of some points of the South American seismic codes is presented herein, comparing them among themselves and with the American Standard ASCE/SEI 7/10 and with the European Standard Eurocode 8. The study is focused in design criteria for buildings. The Western border of South Amer...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: S. H. C. Santos, S. S. Lima, A. Arai
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
Series:Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952012000600006&lng=en&tlng=en
_version_ 1811317185849589760
author S. H. C. Santos
S. S. Lima
A. Arai
author_facet S. H. C. Santos
S. S. Lima
A. Arai
author_sort S. H. C. Santos
collection DOAJ
description A general evaluation of some points of the South American seismic codes is presented herein, comparing them among themselves and with the American Standard ASCE/SEI 7/10 and with the European Standard Eurocode 8. The study is focused in design criteria for buildings. The Western border of South America is one of the most seismically active regions of the World. It corresponds to the confluence of the South American and Nazca plates. This region corresponds roughly to the vicinity of the Andes Mountains. This seismicity diminishes in the direction of the comparatively seismically quieter Eastern South American areas. The South American countries located in its Western Border possess standards for seismic design since some decades ago, being the Brazilian Standard for seismic design only recently published. This study is focused in some critical topics: definition of the recurrence periods for establishing the seismic input; definition of the seismic zonation and design ground motion values; definition of the shape of the design response spectra; consideration of soil amplification, soil liquefaction and soil-structure interaction; classification of the structures in different importance levels; definition of the seismic force-resisting systems and respective response modification coefficients; consideration of structural irregularities and definition of the allowable procedures for the seismic analyses. A simple building structure is analyzed considering the criteria of the several standards and obtained results are compared.
first_indexed 2024-04-13T12:02:26Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2b0adface6d14382bdbb53ef0d67f477
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1983-4195
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-13T12:02:26Z
publisher Instituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)
record_format Article
series Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
spelling doaj.art-2b0adface6d14382bdbb53ef0d67f4772022-12-22T02:47:44ZengInstituto Brasileiro do Concreto (IBRACON)Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais1983-41955681281910.1590/S1983-41952012000600006S1983-41952012000600006Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structuresS. H. C. Santos0S. S. Lima1A. Arai2Universidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroUniversidade Federal do Rio de JaneiroA general evaluation of some points of the South American seismic codes is presented herein, comparing them among themselves and with the American Standard ASCE/SEI 7/10 and with the European Standard Eurocode 8. The study is focused in design criteria for buildings. The Western border of South America is one of the most seismically active regions of the World. It corresponds to the confluence of the South American and Nazca plates. This region corresponds roughly to the vicinity of the Andes Mountains. This seismicity diminishes in the direction of the comparatively seismically quieter Eastern South American areas. The South American countries located in its Western Border possess standards for seismic design since some decades ago, being the Brazilian Standard for seismic design only recently published. This study is focused in some critical topics: definition of the recurrence periods for establishing the seismic input; definition of the seismic zonation and design ground motion values; definition of the shape of the design response spectra; consideration of soil amplification, soil liquefaction and soil-structure interaction; classification of the structures in different importance levels; definition of the seismic force-resisting systems and respective response modification coefficients; consideration of structural irregularities and definition of the allowable procedures for the seismic analyses. A simple building structure is analyzed considering the criteria of the several standards and obtained results are compared.http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952012000600006&lng=en&tlng=enseismic analysisseismic standardscomparative analysis
spellingShingle S. H. C. Santos
S. S. Lima
A. Arai
Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
Revista IBRACON de Estruturas e Materiais
seismic analysis
seismic standards
comparative analysis
title Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
title_full Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
title_fullStr Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
title_full_unstemmed Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
title_short Comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
title_sort comparative study of codes for the seismic design of structures
topic seismic analysis
seismic standards
comparative analysis
url http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1983-41952012000600006&lng=en&tlng=en
work_keys_str_mv AT shcsantos comparativestudyofcodesfortheseismicdesignofstructures
AT sslima comparativestudyofcodesfortheseismicdesignofstructures
AT aarai comparativestudyofcodesfortheseismicdesignofstructures