Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers

Background and objective: The aim of this randomized, single dose, two-period crossover study with two weeks wash-out period was the demonstration of bioequivalence of two recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) formulations after subcutaneous administration of 300 μg compar...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Audrius Sveikata, Gintautas Gumbrevičius, Kastytis Šeštakauskas, Rima Kregždytė, Vytautas Janulionis, Vidmantas Fokas
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2014-01-01
Series:Medicina
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X14000500
_version_ 1827853887769411584
author Audrius Sveikata
Gintautas Gumbrevičius
Kastytis Šeštakauskas
Rima Kregždytė
Vytautas Janulionis
Vidmantas Fokas
author_facet Audrius Sveikata
Gintautas Gumbrevičius
Kastytis Šeštakauskas
Rima Kregždytė
Vytautas Janulionis
Vidmantas Fokas
author_sort Audrius Sveikata
collection DOAJ
description Background and objective: The aim of this randomized, single dose, two-period crossover study with two weeks wash-out period was the demonstration of bioequivalence of two recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) formulations after subcutaneous administration of 300 μg comparing their pharmacokinetic (primary endpoints AUC0–24, AUC0–∞ and Cmax) and pharmacodynamic (primary endpoints ANC AUC0–72, ANC AUC0–∞ and ANCmax) profiles in healthy male subjects. Materials and methods: A total of 36 (23.0 ± 6.0 years, 76.6 ± 7.2 kg) healthy subjects were recruited. Using a 1:1 randomization ratio, subjects were randomly assigned to one of two possible treatment-sequence groups to receive the single dose of test formulation (Gp-02) and reference product (Neupogen™) concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) up to 24 h and the Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) was determined using hematology analyzer Coulter STKS™ (Beckman Coulter) up to 72 h after injection. The geometric mean of primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) would fall in the bioequivalence range of 80%–125%. Results: AUC0–24 (ratio of means 103.4, 90% CI: 95.6–111.9), AUC0–∞ (103.4, 90% CI: 95.7–111.7), Cmax (99.6, 90% CI: 89.0–111.4), ANC AUC0–72 (100.0, 90% CI: 96.6–103.5), ANC AUC0–∞ (100.8, 90% CI: 96.5–105.3), and ANCmax (100.2, 90% CI: 95.4–105.1) were determined. Single doses of test and reference formulations were well tolerated. The incidence of AEs was equally distributed across treatment groups with the most frequent AEs being headache, fever, and back pain. Conclusions: The study results demonstrated the bioequivalence of Gp-02, a new formulation of filgrastim, and the reference product Neupogen™.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T11:13:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2b25ea24dc5f42a0a98d64fbfef949b9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1010-660X
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T11:13:18Z
publishDate 2014-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Medicina
spelling doaj.art-2b25ea24dc5f42a0a98d64fbfef949b92023-09-02T02:29:34ZengMDPI AGMedicina1010-660X2014-01-0150314414910.1016/j.medici.2014.08.001Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteersAudrius Sveikata0Gintautas Gumbrevičius1Kastytis Šeštakauskas2Rima Kregždytė3Vytautas Janulionis4Vidmantas Fokas5Institute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medicial Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaInstitute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medicial Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaInstitute of Physiology and Pharmacology, Medicial Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaNeuroscience Institute, Medical Academy, Lithuanian University of Health Sciences, Kaunas, LithuaniaDepartment of Applied Mathematics, Kaunas University of Technology, Kaunas, Lithuania“Biomapas” UAB, Kaunas, LithuaniaBackground and objective: The aim of this randomized, single dose, two-period crossover study with two weeks wash-out period was the demonstration of bioequivalence of two recombinant human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (rG-CSF) formulations after subcutaneous administration of 300 μg comparing their pharmacokinetic (primary endpoints AUC0–24, AUC0–∞ and Cmax) and pharmacodynamic (primary endpoints ANC AUC0–72, ANC AUC0–∞ and ANCmax) profiles in healthy male subjects. Materials and methods: A total of 36 (23.0 ± 6.0 years, 76.6 ± 7.2 kg) healthy subjects were recruited. Using a 1:1 randomization ratio, subjects were randomly assigned to one of two possible treatment-sequence groups to receive the single dose of test formulation (Gp-02) and reference product (Neupogen™) concentrations were measured by enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) up to 24 h and the Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) was determined using hematology analyzer Coulter STKS™ (Beckman Coulter) up to 72 h after injection. The geometric mean of primary pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic variables were considered bioequivalent if the 90% confidence intervals (CI) would fall in the bioequivalence range of 80%–125%. Results: AUC0–24 (ratio of means 103.4, 90% CI: 95.6–111.9), AUC0–∞ (103.4, 90% CI: 95.7–111.7), Cmax (99.6, 90% CI: 89.0–111.4), ANC AUC0–72 (100.0, 90% CI: 96.6–103.5), ANC AUC0–∞ (100.8, 90% CI: 96.5–105.3), and ANCmax (100.2, 90% CI: 95.4–105.1) were determined. Single doses of test and reference formulations were well tolerated. The incidence of AEs was equally distributed across treatment groups with the most frequent AEs being headache, fever, and back pain. Conclusions: The study results demonstrated the bioequivalence of Gp-02, a new formulation of filgrastim, and the reference product Neupogen™.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X14000500Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factorBiosimilarityPharmacokineticsPharmacodynamicsSafety
spellingShingle Audrius Sveikata
Gintautas Gumbrevičius
Kastytis Šeštakauskas
Rima Kregždytė
Vytautas Janulionis
Vidmantas Fokas
Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
Medicina
Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Biosimilarity
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacodynamics
Safety
title Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
title_full Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
title_short Comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony-stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
title_sort comparison of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of two recombinant granulocyte colony stimulating factor formulations after single subcutaneous administration to healthy volunteers
topic Human granulocyte colony-stimulating factor
Biosimilarity
Pharmacokinetics
Pharmacodynamics
Safety
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1010660X14000500
work_keys_str_mv AT audriussveikata comparisonofthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicpropertiesoftworecombinantgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorformulationsaftersinglesubcutaneousadministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT gintautasgumbrevicius comparisonofthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicpropertiesoftworecombinantgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorformulationsaftersinglesubcutaneousadministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT kastytissestakauskas comparisonofthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicpropertiesoftworecombinantgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorformulationsaftersinglesubcutaneousadministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT rimakregzdyte comparisonofthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicpropertiesoftworecombinantgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorformulationsaftersinglesubcutaneousadministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT vytautasjanulionis comparisonofthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicpropertiesoftworecombinantgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorformulationsaftersinglesubcutaneousadministrationtohealthyvolunteers
AT vidmantasfokas comparisonofthepharmacokineticandpharmacodynamicpropertiesoftworecombinantgranulocytecolonystimulatingfactorformulationsaftersinglesubcutaneousadministrationtohealthyvolunteers