Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects

Exports of pellets from the United States (US) are growing significantly to meet the demand for renewable energy in the European Union. This transatlantic trade in pellets has raised questions about the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of these pellets and their effects on conventional forest product...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Weiwei Wang, Puneet Dwivedi, Robert Abt, Madhu Khanna
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: IOP Publishing 2015-01-01
Series:Environmental Research Letters
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114019
_version_ 1797748611845455872
author Weiwei Wang
Puneet Dwivedi
Robert Abt
Madhu Khanna
author_facet Weiwei Wang
Puneet Dwivedi
Robert Abt
Madhu Khanna
author_sort Weiwei Wang
collection DOAJ
description Exports of pellets from the United States (US) are growing significantly to meet the demand for renewable energy in the European Union. This transatlantic trade in pellets has raised questions about the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of these pellets and their effects on conventional forest product markets in the US. This paper examines the GHG intensity of pellets exported from the US using either forest biomass only or forest and agricultural biomass combined. We develop an integrated dynamic, price-endogenous, partial equilibrium model of the forestry, agricultural, and transportation sectors in the US to investigate not only the direct life-cycle GHG intensity of pellets but also the accompanying indirect market and land use effects induced by changes in prices of forest and agricultural products over the 2007–2032 period. Across different scenarios of high and low pellet demand that can be met with either forest biomass only or with forest and agricultural biomass, we find that the GHG intensity of pellet based electricity is 74% to 85% lower than that of coal-based electricity. We also find that the GHG intensity of pellets produced using agricultural and forest biomass is 28% to 34% lower than that of pellets produced using forest biomass only. GHG effects due to induced direct and indirect changes in forest carbon stock caused by changes in harvest rotations, changes in land use and in conventional wood production account for 11% to 26% of the overall GHG intensity of pellets produced from forest biomass only; these effects are negative with the use of forest and agricultural biomass.
first_indexed 2024-03-12T16:07:18Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2b3434a8f70e4b45aeb06898d68ec973
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1748-9326
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-12T16:07:18Z
publishDate 2015-01-01
publisher IOP Publishing
record_format Article
series Environmental Research Letters
spelling doaj.art-2b3434a8f70e4b45aeb06898d68ec9732023-08-09T14:16:46ZengIOP PublishingEnvironmental Research Letters1748-93262015-01-01101111401910.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114019Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effectsWeiwei Wang0Puneet Dwivedi1Robert Abt2Madhu Khanna3Department of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois , Urbana, IL-61801, USAWarnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia , Athens, GA-30602, USADepartment of Forestry & Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University , Raleigh, NC-27695, USADepartment of Agricultural and Consumer Economics, University of Illinois , Urbana, IL-61801, USAExports of pellets from the United States (US) are growing significantly to meet the demand for renewable energy in the European Union. This transatlantic trade in pellets has raised questions about the greenhouse gas (GHG) intensity of these pellets and their effects on conventional forest product markets in the US. This paper examines the GHG intensity of pellets exported from the US using either forest biomass only or forest and agricultural biomass combined. We develop an integrated dynamic, price-endogenous, partial equilibrium model of the forestry, agricultural, and transportation sectors in the US to investigate not only the direct life-cycle GHG intensity of pellets but also the accompanying indirect market and land use effects induced by changes in prices of forest and agricultural products over the 2007–2032 period. Across different scenarios of high and low pellet demand that can be met with either forest biomass only or with forest and agricultural biomass, we find that the GHG intensity of pellet based electricity is 74% to 85% lower than that of coal-based electricity. We also find that the GHG intensity of pellets produced using agricultural and forest biomass is 28% to 34% lower than that of pellets produced using forest biomass only. GHG effects due to induced direct and indirect changes in forest carbon stock caused by changes in harvest rotations, changes in land use and in conventional wood production account for 11% to 26% of the overall GHG intensity of pellets produced from forest biomass only; these effects are negative with the use of forest and agricultural biomass.https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114019land use changedynamic optimizationforest biomassagricultural biomassmarket induced
spellingShingle Weiwei Wang
Puneet Dwivedi
Robert Abt
Madhu Khanna
Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
Environmental Research Letters
land use change
dynamic optimization
forest biomass
agricultural biomass
market induced
title Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
title_full Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
title_fullStr Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
title_full_unstemmed Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
title_short Carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets: accounting for market-driven effects
title_sort carbon savings with transatlantic trade in pellets accounting for market driven effects
topic land use change
dynamic optimization
forest biomass
agricultural biomass
market induced
url https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/10/11/114019
work_keys_str_mv AT weiweiwang carbonsavingswithtransatlantictradeinpelletsaccountingformarketdriveneffects
AT puneetdwivedi carbonsavingswithtransatlantictradeinpelletsaccountingformarketdriveneffects
AT robertabt carbonsavingswithtransatlantictradeinpelletsaccountingformarketdriveneffects
AT madhukhanna carbonsavingswithtransatlantictradeinpelletsaccountingformarketdriveneffects