Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
I would like to comment on Watson’s interesting paper in the Spring 2022 Journal of Scientific Exploration on the subject of the 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness photograph. Having a couple of Roland Watson’s books in my personal library (which I strongly recommend) and having corresponded with him for his...
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
SSE
2023-02-01
|
Series: | Journal of Scientific Exploration |
Online Access: | https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2787 |
_version_ | 1811165618501582848 |
---|---|
author | Bruce Champagne |
author_facet | Bruce Champagne |
author_sort | Bruce Champagne |
collection | DOAJ |
description |
I would like to comment on Watson’s interesting paper in the Spring 2022 Journal of Scientific Exploration on the subject of the 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness photograph. Having a couple of Roland Watson’s books in my personal library (which I strongly recommend) and having corresponded with him for his opinion and thoughts in my own research, I can assure the reader that Watson has a significant knowledge of the history and current thought on the subject of the Loch Ness Monster (LNM) and other unidentified aquatic megafauna of the area. I would suggest this paper would benefit, and the proposals strengthened, with a greater and more consistent application and methodology (Heuvelmans, 1988) and a greater effort towards explanations of any imbalance.
|
first_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:39:34Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2b58bc7b50eb484894162b32b0e8aa6e |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 0892-3310 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-10T15:39:34Z |
publishDate | 2023-02-01 |
publisher | SSE |
record_format | Article |
series | Journal of Scientific Exploration |
spelling | doaj.art-2b58bc7b50eb484894162b32b0e8aa6e2023-02-12T12:49:04ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102023-02-0136410.31275/20222787Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"Bruce Champagne I would like to comment on Watson’s interesting paper in the Spring 2022 Journal of Scientific Exploration on the subject of the 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness photograph. Having a couple of Roland Watson’s books in my personal library (which I strongly recommend) and having corresponded with him for his opinion and thoughts in my own research, I can assure the reader that Watson has a significant knowledge of the history and current thought on the subject of the Loch Ness Monster (LNM) and other unidentified aquatic megafauna of the area. I would suggest this paper would benefit, and the proposals strengthened, with a greater and more consistent application and methodology (Heuvelmans, 1988) and a greater effort towards explanations of any imbalance. https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2787 |
spellingShingle | Bruce Champagne Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph" Journal of Scientific Exploration |
title | Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph" |
title_full | Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph" |
title_fullStr | Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph" |
title_full_unstemmed | Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph" |
title_short | Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph" |
title_sort | comments on watson s empirical analysis of the hugh gray nessie photograph |
url | https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2787 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brucechampagne commentsonwatsonsempiricalanalysisofthehughgraynessiephotograph |