Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"

I would like to comment on Watson’s interesting paper in the Spring 2022 Journal of Scientific Exploration on the subject of the 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness photograph. Having a couple of Roland Watson’s books in my personal library (which I strongly recommend) and having corresponded with him for his...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bruce Champagne
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SSE 2023-02-01
Series:Journal of Scientific Exploration
Online Access:https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2787
_version_ 1811165618501582848
author Bruce Champagne
author_facet Bruce Champagne
author_sort Bruce Champagne
collection DOAJ
description I would like to comment on Watson’s interesting paper in the Spring 2022 Journal of Scientific Exploration on the subject of the 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness photograph. Having a couple of Roland Watson’s books in my personal library (which I strongly recommend) and having corresponded with him for his opinion and thoughts in my own research, I can assure the reader that Watson has a significant knowledge of the history and current thought on the subject of the Loch Ness Monster (LNM) and other unidentified aquatic megafauna of the area. I would suggest this paper would benefit, and the proposals strengthened, with a greater and more consistent application and methodology (Heuvelmans, 1988) and a greater effort towards explanations of any imbalance.
first_indexed 2024-04-10T15:39:34Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2b58bc7b50eb484894162b32b0e8aa6e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 0892-3310
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-10T15:39:34Z
publishDate 2023-02-01
publisher SSE
record_format Article
series Journal of Scientific Exploration
spelling doaj.art-2b58bc7b50eb484894162b32b0e8aa6e2023-02-12T12:49:04ZengSSEJournal of Scientific Exploration0892-33102023-02-0136410.31275/20222787Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"Bruce Champagne I would like to comment on Watson’s interesting paper in the Spring 2022 Journal of Scientific Exploration on the subject of the 1933 Hugh Gray Loch Ness photograph. Having a couple of Roland Watson’s books in my personal library (which I strongly recommend) and having corresponded with him for his opinion and thoughts in my own research, I can assure the reader that Watson has a significant knowledge of the history and current thought on the subject of the Loch Ness Monster (LNM) and other unidentified aquatic megafauna of the area. I would suggest this paper would benefit, and the proposals strengthened, with a greater and more consistent application and methodology (Heuvelmans, 1988) and a greater effort towards explanations of any imbalance. https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2787
spellingShingle Bruce Champagne
Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
Journal of Scientific Exploration
title Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
title_full Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
title_fullStr Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
title_full_unstemmed Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
title_short Comments on Watson's "Empirical Analysis of the Hugh Gray 'Nessie' Photograph"
title_sort comments on watson s empirical analysis of the hugh gray nessie photograph
url https://journalofscientificexploration.org/index.php/jse/article/view/2787
work_keys_str_mv AT brucechampagne commentsonwatsonsempiricalanalysisofthehughgraynessiephotograph