Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process.
This work-paper is about providing the tutor approach of practicum, understood as a collaborative process between supervisor and tutor. We meant to explain the relationship between colleges/universities with the goal of achieving a learning from which we can get a double qualification because the du...
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | English |
| Published: |
Universitat Politècnica de València
2012-08-01
|
| Series: | Red U |
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/REDU/article/view/6114 |
| _version_ | 1818362063115780096 |
|---|---|
| author | Antonio Pedro Cid Gonzalez |
| author_facet | Antonio Pedro Cid Gonzalez |
| author_sort | Antonio Pedro Cid Gonzalez |
| collection | DOAJ |
| description | This work-paper is about providing the tutor approach of practicum, understood as a collaborative process between supervisor and tutor. We meant to explain the relationship between colleges/universities with the goal of achieving a learning from which we can get a double qualification because the dual nature, curricular-practical, of the process. This approach wants to surpass and improve this dual view of the same process because even most of the times it is equal, it doesn´t always happen this way, creating a discordance that looks unjustified. If the process is unique (although it is diverse in his content), this process should be qualified as such, making the collaborative assessment process surpass its internal dichotomy (theorical-practical).
This discordance isn´t as important by itself but as evidenced of communication, collaboration and unity ack as the result of agreement absence and a probable commitment absence in programming.
The analysis of the PRACTICUM planning and programming process, of his implementation, and the analysis of the used tools in this assessment process will guide some of the proposal made in this paper. |
| first_indexed | 2024-12-13T21:26:37Z |
| format | Article |
| id | doaj.art-2b664c64bffe4ce9b8ea16f008952c26 |
| institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
| issn | 1887-4592 |
| language | English |
| last_indexed | 2024-12-13T21:26:37Z |
| publishDate | 2012-08-01 |
| publisher | Universitat Politècnica de València |
| record_format | Article |
| series | Red U |
| spelling | doaj.art-2b664c64bffe4ce9b8ea16f008952c262022-12-21T23:30:56ZengUniversitat Politècnica de ValènciaRed U1887-45922012-08-0110238139410.4995/redu.2012.61144447Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process.Antonio Pedro Cid Gonzalez0Universidad de VigoThis work-paper is about providing the tutor approach of practicum, understood as a collaborative process between supervisor and tutor. We meant to explain the relationship between colleges/universities with the goal of achieving a learning from which we can get a double qualification because the dual nature, curricular-practical, of the process. This approach wants to surpass and improve this dual view of the same process because even most of the times it is equal, it doesn´t always happen this way, creating a discordance that looks unjustified. If the process is unique (although it is diverse in his content), this process should be qualified as such, making the collaborative assessment process surpass its internal dichotomy (theorical-practical). This discordance isn´t as important by itself but as evidenced of communication, collaboration and unity ack as the result of agreement absence and a probable commitment absence in programming. The analysis of the PRACTICUM planning and programming process, of his implementation, and the analysis of the used tools in this assessment process will guide some of the proposal made in this paper.https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/REDU/article/view/6114practicumtutorsupervisorevaluaciónprogramacióninstrumentos |
| spellingShingle | Antonio Pedro Cid Gonzalez Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process. Red U practicum tutor supervisor evaluación programación instrumentos |
| title | Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process. |
| title_full | Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process. |
| title_fullStr | Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process. |
| title_full_unstemmed | Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process. |
| title_short | Concordance Vs discordance in the assessment of the Practicum: protocols, tools and personal items of the process. |
| title_sort | concordance vs discordance in the assessment of the practicum protocols tools and personal items of the process |
| topic | practicum tutor supervisor evaluación programación instrumentos |
| url | https://polipapers.upv.es/index.php/REDU/article/view/6114 |
| work_keys_str_mv | AT antoniopedrocidgonzalez concordancevsdiscordanceintheassessmentofthepracticumprotocolstoolsandpersonalitemsoftheprocess |