Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study

Abstract Purpose This study examined if speed reduction effects from animal-vehicle collision (AVC) countermeasures are merely local or do extend to a wider area, and what implications the results have on road planning practice regarding AVCs. Methods Twenty-five drivers drove repeatedly on a 9-km l...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Annika K. Jägerbrand, Hans Antonson, Christer Ahlström
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: SpringerOpen 2018-09-01
Series:European Transport Research Review
Subjects:
Online Access:http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0314-8
_version_ 1818540173184466944
author Annika K. Jägerbrand
Hans Antonson
Christer Ahlström
author_facet Annika K. Jägerbrand
Hans Antonson
Christer Ahlström
author_sort Annika K. Jägerbrand
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Purpose This study examined if speed reduction effects from animal-vehicle collision (AVC) countermeasures are merely local or do extend to a wider area, and what implications the results have on road planning practice regarding AVCs. Methods Twenty-five drivers drove repeatedly on a 9-km long road stretch in a high-fidelity driving simulator. The development of vehicle speed in the surrounding of an automatic speed camera, a wildlife warning sign and a radio message, were investigated in a full factorial within-subject experiment. The factors wildlife fence (with/without) and forest (dense/open landscape) were also included. Results The radio warning message had the largest influence on vehicle speed with a speed reduction of 8 km/h that lasted beyond 1 km and 2 km after the implementation. Eighty-eight per cent of the drivers reported being made extra aware of AVC due to the radio message, which was also associated with stress, insecurity and unsafety. The warning sign reduced vehicle speed by 1.5 km/h, but speed reductions were not significantly reduced 1 km after the implementation. Only 8 % of the drivers felt insecure/unsafe after passing the wildlife warning sign, explaining its limited impact on speed. There were no main effects of the automatic speed camera on vehicle speed at longer distances after implementation. Conclusions We recommend that AVC countermeasures should be of various design, occur at various segments along the road, and preferably be adaptive and geo-localized to minimize habituation effects on drivers.
first_indexed 2024-12-11T21:51:49Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2b6de08c7401411995162f464b09eefe
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1867-0717
1866-8887
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-11T21:51:49Z
publishDate 2018-09-01
publisher SpringerOpen
record_format Article
series European Transport Research Review
spelling doaj.art-2b6de08c7401411995162f464b09eefe2022-12-22T00:49:26ZengSpringerOpenEuropean Transport Research Review1867-07171866-88872018-09-0110211210.1186/s12544-018-0314-8Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator studyAnnika K. Jägerbrand0Hans Antonson1Christer Ahlström2Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI)Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI)Swedish National Road and Transport Research Institute (VTI)Abstract Purpose This study examined if speed reduction effects from animal-vehicle collision (AVC) countermeasures are merely local or do extend to a wider area, and what implications the results have on road planning practice regarding AVCs. Methods Twenty-five drivers drove repeatedly on a 9-km long road stretch in a high-fidelity driving simulator. The development of vehicle speed in the surrounding of an automatic speed camera, a wildlife warning sign and a radio message, were investigated in a full factorial within-subject experiment. The factors wildlife fence (with/without) and forest (dense/open landscape) were also included. Results The radio warning message had the largest influence on vehicle speed with a speed reduction of 8 km/h that lasted beyond 1 km and 2 km after the implementation. Eighty-eight per cent of the drivers reported being made extra aware of AVC due to the radio message, which was also associated with stress, insecurity and unsafety. The warning sign reduced vehicle speed by 1.5 km/h, but speed reductions were not significantly reduced 1 km after the implementation. Only 8 % of the drivers felt insecure/unsafe after passing the wildlife warning sign, explaining its limited impact on speed. There were no main effects of the automatic speed camera on vehicle speed at longer distances after implementation. Conclusions We recommend that AVC countermeasures should be of various design, occur at various segments along the road, and preferably be adaptive and geo-localized to minimize habituation effects on drivers.http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0314-8Traffic safetyAccidentsCountermeasuresMitigation measuresAVCPlanning
spellingShingle Annika K. Jägerbrand
Hans Antonson
Christer Ahlström
Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study
European Transport Research Review
Traffic safety
Accidents
Countermeasures
Mitigation measures
AVC
Planning
title Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study
title_full Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study
title_fullStr Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study
title_full_unstemmed Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study
title_short Speed reduction effects over distance of animal-vehicle collision countermeasures – a driving simulator study
title_sort speed reduction effects over distance of animal vehicle collision countermeasures a driving simulator study
topic Traffic safety
Accidents
Countermeasures
Mitigation measures
AVC
Planning
url http://link.springer.com/article/10.1186/s12544-018-0314-8
work_keys_str_mv AT annikakjagerbrand speedreductioneffectsoverdistanceofanimalvehiclecollisioncountermeasuresadrivingsimulatorstudy
AT hansantonson speedreductioneffectsoverdistanceofanimalvehiclecollisioncountermeasuresadrivingsimulatorstudy
AT christerahlstrom speedreductioneffectsoverdistanceofanimalvehiclecollisioncountermeasuresadrivingsimulatorstudy