Precontractual duty to inform the surety
Sureties often claim that they have not been informed about the difficult financial situation of the principal debtor prior to the conclusion of the contract and that they have been the victims of a fraud. Usually, it is the debtor who is responsible for the fraud: he is interested in concealing or...
Main Author: | Dabić Snežana |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
University of Belgrade, Faculty of Law, Belgrade, Serbia
2018-01-01
|
Series: | Anali Pravnog Fakulteta u Beogradu |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://scindeks-clanci.ceon.rs/data/pdf/0003-2565/2018/0003-25651802220D.pdf |
Similar Items
-
Legal effects of the fraud originating from the co-surety on the validity of the surety contract and/or the rights of the surety: The victim of the fraud
by: Dabić Snežana
Published: (2020-01-01) -
The law relating to guarantees /
by: 284139 Nasser Hamid
Published: (2009) -
The law of guarantees in Singapore and Malaysia /
by: 403905 Low, Kee Yang
Published: (2003) -
Informed consent, duty of disclosure and chiropractic: where are we?
by: J. Keith Simpson, et al.
Published: (2020-11-01) -
The Doctrine of Informed Consent and Duty of Disclosure: A Comparative Essay between the US, UK, Australia and Malaysia with Indonesia
by: Alyssa Dalila Badli Esham
Published: (2019-12-01)