Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers

Golf swing analysis is common in both recreational and professional levels where players are searching for improvements in shot accuracy and distance. The use of motion analysis systems such as the portable Polhemus Liberty system is gaining interest by coaches and players; however, to date, no rese...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Matilda Jane Wheare, Maximillian J. Nelson, Ryan Lumsden, Alec Buttfield, Robert George Crowther
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2021-06-01
Series:Sensors
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/13/4330
_version_ 1827688841720365056
author Matilda Jane Wheare
Maximillian J. Nelson
Ryan Lumsden
Alec Buttfield
Robert George Crowther
author_facet Matilda Jane Wheare
Maximillian J. Nelson
Ryan Lumsden
Alec Buttfield
Robert George Crowther
author_sort Matilda Jane Wheare
collection DOAJ
description Golf swing analysis is common in both recreational and professional levels where players are searching for improvements in shot accuracy and distance. The use of motion analysis systems such as the portable Polhemus Liberty system is gaining interest by coaches and players; however, to date, no research has examined the usefulness of the Polhemus Liberty system for golf swing analysis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the Polhemus Liberty system and validity compared to the VICON Nexus motion analysis system when assessing segment (pelvis and thorax) and joint (shoulder, elbow and wrist) angular kinematics during a golf swing at key events (address, top of backswing and impact). Fifteen elite amateur/professional golfers performed ten golf swing trials within specified bounds using their 5-iron club. Reliability was assessed using interclass coefficient, effect size and <i>t</i>-test statistics by all participants completing two separate testing sessions on separate days following the same experimental protocol. Validity was assessed using effect size, Pearson correlation and <i>t</i>-test statistics by comparing swings captured using both Polhemus Liberty and VICON Nexus concurrently. Results demonstrated no difference in ball outcome results using the Trackman launch monitor (<i>P</i> > 0.05) and that the Polhemus Liberty system was reliable across the two sessions for all segment (pelvis and thorax) and joint (lead shoulder (gleno-humeral joint), elbow and wrist) angular kinematics (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Validity analysis showed that the Polhemus Liberty system for the segments (pelvis and thorax) and joints (lead shoulder and wrist) were different compared to the VICON Nexus data at key events during the golf swing. Although validity could not be confirmed against VICON Nexus modeling, the Polhemus Liberty system may still be useful for golf swing analysis across training sessions. However, caution should be applied when comparing data from the system to published research data using different motion analysis methods.
first_indexed 2024-03-10T10:05:19Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ba4c6c1b2dd4a949aefd3b60644fbe5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 1424-8220
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-10T10:05:19Z
publishDate 2021-06-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Sensors
spelling doaj.art-2ba4c6c1b2dd4a949aefd3b60644fbe52023-11-22T01:36:16ZengMDPI AGSensors1424-82202021-06-012113433010.3390/s21134330Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite GolfersMatilda Jane Wheare0Maximillian J. Nelson1Ryan Lumsden2Alec Buttfield3Robert George Crowther4Allied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, AustraliaAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, AustraliaQ Golf, Adelaide 5001, AustraliaBioalchemy, Adelaide 5001, AustraliaAllied Health and Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide 5001, AustraliaGolf swing analysis is common in both recreational and professional levels where players are searching for improvements in shot accuracy and distance. The use of motion analysis systems such as the portable Polhemus Liberty system is gaining interest by coaches and players; however, to date, no research has examined the usefulness of the Polhemus Liberty system for golf swing analysis. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to determine the reliability of the Polhemus Liberty system and validity compared to the VICON Nexus motion analysis system when assessing segment (pelvis and thorax) and joint (shoulder, elbow and wrist) angular kinematics during a golf swing at key events (address, top of backswing and impact). Fifteen elite amateur/professional golfers performed ten golf swing trials within specified bounds using their 5-iron club. Reliability was assessed using interclass coefficient, effect size and <i>t</i>-test statistics by all participants completing two separate testing sessions on separate days following the same experimental protocol. Validity was assessed using effect size, Pearson correlation and <i>t</i>-test statistics by comparing swings captured using both Polhemus Liberty and VICON Nexus concurrently. Results demonstrated no difference in ball outcome results using the Trackman launch monitor (<i>P</i> > 0.05) and that the Polhemus Liberty system was reliable across the two sessions for all segment (pelvis and thorax) and joint (lead shoulder (gleno-humeral joint), elbow and wrist) angular kinematics (<i>P</i> > 0.05). Validity analysis showed that the Polhemus Liberty system for the segments (pelvis and thorax) and joints (lead shoulder and wrist) were different compared to the VICON Nexus data at key events during the golf swing. Although validity could not be confirmed against VICON Nexus modeling, the Polhemus Liberty system may still be useful for golf swing analysis across training sessions. However, caution should be applied when comparing data from the system to published research data using different motion analysis methods.https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/13/4330golfbiomechanicsperformanceequipmentPolhemus Liberty
spellingShingle Matilda Jane Wheare
Maximillian J. Nelson
Ryan Lumsden
Alec Buttfield
Robert George Crowther
Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers
Sensors
golf
biomechanics
performance
equipment
Polhemus Liberty
title Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers
title_full Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers
title_fullStr Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers
title_full_unstemmed Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers
title_short Reliability and Validity of the Polhemus Liberty System for Upper Body Segment and Joint Angular Kinematics of Elite Golfers
title_sort reliability and validity of the polhemus liberty system for upper body segment and joint angular kinematics of elite golfers
topic golf
biomechanics
performance
equipment
Polhemus Liberty
url https://www.mdpi.com/1424-8220/21/13/4330
work_keys_str_mv AT matildajanewheare reliabilityandvalidityofthepolhemuslibertysystemforupperbodysegmentandjointangularkinematicsofelitegolfers
AT maximillianjnelson reliabilityandvalidityofthepolhemuslibertysystemforupperbodysegmentandjointangularkinematicsofelitegolfers
AT ryanlumsden reliabilityandvalidityofthepolhemuslibertysystemforupperbodysegmentandjointangularkinematicsofelitegolfers
AT alecbuttfield reliabilityandvalidityofthepolhemuslibertysystemforupperbodysegmentandjointangularkinematicsofelitegolfers
AT robertgeorgecrowther reliabilityandvalidityofthepolhemuslibertysystemforupperbodysegmentandjointangularkinematicsofelitegolfers