The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
Abstract Objectives Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final ten...
Main Authors: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Format: | Article |
Language: | English |
Published: |
Wiley
2022-08-01
|
Series: | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research |
Subjects: | |
Online Access: | https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593 |
_version_ | 1798037302325280768 |
---|---|
author | Behnaz Ebadian Mohammad Jowkar Amin Davoudi Amirhossein Fathi Mohsen Ziaei Einar Berg |
author_facet | Behnaz Ebadian Mohammad Jowkar Amin Davoudi Amirhossein Fathi Mohsen Ziaei Einar Berg |
author_sort | Behnaz Ebadian |
collection | DOAJ |
description | Abstract Objectives Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement. Materials and Methods Seventy computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing metal implant‐supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1‐an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2‐sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4‐an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5‐sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05. Results The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water. Conclusions Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements. |
first_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:24:42Z |
format | Article |
id | doaj.art-2ba759228f3245e7ada8ea98cebd19c5 |
institution | Directory Open Access Journal |
issn | 2057-4347 |
language | English |
last_indexed | 2024-04-11T21:24:42Z |
publishDate | 2022-08-01 |
publisher | Wiley |
record_format | Article |
series | Clinical and Experimental Dental Research |
spelling | doaj.art-2ba759228f3245e7ada8ea98cebd19c52022-12-22T04:02:28ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472022-08-01841002100710.1002/cre2.593The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro studyBehnaz Ebadian0Mohammad Jowkar1Amin Davoudi2Amirhossein Fathi3Mohsen Ziaei4Einar Berg5Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Implants Research Center Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences Shahrekord IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Dental Materials Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Dental Materials Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Bergen University Bergen NorwayAbstract Objectives Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement. Materials and Methods Seventy computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing metal implant‐supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1‐an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2‐sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4‐an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5‐sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05. Results The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water. Conclusions Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593CAD/CAMcleansing methodrecementationtensile bond force |
spellingShingle | Behnaz Ebadian Mohammad Jowkar Amin Davoudi Amirhossein Fathi Mohsen Ziaei Einar Berg The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study Clinical and Experimental Dental Research CAD/CAM cleansing method recementation tensile bond force |
title | The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study |
title_full | The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study |
title_fullStr | The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study |
title_full_unstemmed | The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study |
title_short | The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study |
title_sort | effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant supported metal copings an in vitro study |
topic | CAD/CAM cleansing method recementation tensile bond force |
url | https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT behnazebadian theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT mohammadjowkar theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT amindavoudi theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT amirhosseinfathi theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT mohsenziaei theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT einarberg theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT behnazebadian effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT mohammadjowkar effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT amindavoudi effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT amirhosseinfathi effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT mohsenziaei effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy AT einarberg effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy |