The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study

Abstract Objectives Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final ten...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Behnaz Ebadian, Mohammad Jowkar, Amin Davoudi, Amirhossein Fathi, Mohsen Ziaei, Einar Berg
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Wiley 2022-08-01
Series:Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
Subjects:
Online Access:https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593
_version_ 1798037302325280768
author Behnaz Ebadian
Mohammad Jowkar
Amin Davoudi
Amirhossein Fathi
Mohsen Ziaei
Einar Berg
author_facet Behnaz Ebadian
Mohammad Jowkar
Amin Davoudi
Amirhossein Fathi
Mohsen Ziaei
Einar Berg
author_sort Behnaz Ebadian
collection DOAJ
description Abstract Objectives Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement. Materials and Methods Seventy computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing metal implant‐supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1‐an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2‐sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4‐an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5‐sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05. Results The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water. Conclusions Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements.
first_indexed 2024-04-11T21:24:42Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ba759228f3245e7ada8ea98cebd19c5
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2057-4347
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-11T21:24:42Z
publishDate 2022-08-01
publisher Wiley
record_format Article
series Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
spelling doaj.art-2ba759228f3245e7ada8ea98cebd19c52022-12-22T04:02:28ZengWileyClinical and Experimental Dental Research2057-43472022-08-01841002100710.1002/cre2.593The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro studyBehnaz Ebadian0Mohammad Jowkar1Amin Davoudi2Amirhossein Fathi3Mohsen Ziaei4Einar Berg5Department of Prosthodontics, Dental Implants Research Center Dental Research Institute, School of Dentistry, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Shahrekord University of Medical Sciences Shahrekord IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Dental Materials Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Dental Materials Research Center, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences Isfahan IranDepartment of Prosthodontics Bergen University Bergen NorwayAbstract Objectives Complete cleaning of temporary cement before permanent cementation of cement‐retained implant‐supported prosthesis (CISP) when recementing the crown is critical. This study evaluated the effect of different cleaning methods for removing traces of temporary cement on the final tensile bond force (TBF) of CISP recemented with resin cement. Materials and Methods Seventy computer‐aided design/computer‐aided manufacturing metal implant‐supported copings were prepared and distributed into seven groups (N = 10). Copings of six groups (60 samples) were cemented with temporary cement with eugenol and subjected to 5000 thermocycling. After debonding by a universal testing machine, the internal surfaces of the copings were cleaned using one of the six following methods: 1‐an ultrasonic water bath (UW), 2‐sandblasting, then washing with water (SW), 3‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic water bath (SUW), 4‐an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (UA), 5‐sandblasting, then washing with isopropyl alcohol (SA) or 6‐sandblasting and an ultrasonic isopropyl alcohol bath (SUA). Then the subjects were subsequently cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement. In the seventh group (control, N = 10), the copings were cemented by dual‐cure self‐adhesive resin cement without the temporization phase. The TBF was tested using a universal testing machine with a cross‐head speed of 1 mm/min. Two‐way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and post‐hoc Tamhane tests were used for statistical analysis at a significance level of α = .05. Results The maximum mean of TBF value was observed in SUA group (845 ± 203 N), and the minimum was observed in the temporary cement group (49 ± 20 N). All groups which were cleaned with isopropyl alcohol showed significantly higher TBF values compared with those cleaned with water. Conclusions Cleaning of the inner surface of metal copings after debonding with sandblasting and isopropyl alcohol results in the highest value of TBF by eliminating the effect of remaining eugenol and removing traces of temporary cements.https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593CAD/CAMcleansing methodrecementationtensile bond force
spellingShingle Behnaz Ebadian
Mohammad Jowkar
Amin Davoudi
Amirhossein Fathi
Mohsen Ziaei
Einar Berg
The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
Clinical and Experimental Dental Research
CAD/CAM
cleansing method
recementation
tensile bond force
title The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_full The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_fullStr The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_short The effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant‐supported metal copings: An in vitro study
title_sort effect of different cleansing methods for removing temporary cement on the tensile bond force of permanently cemented implant supported metal copings an in vitro study
topic CAD/CAM
cleansing method
recementation
tensile bond force
url https://doi.org/10.1002/cre2.593
work_keys_str_mv AT behnazebadian theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT mohammadjowkar theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT amindavoudi theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT amirhosseinfathi theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT mohsenziaei theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT einarberg theeffectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT behnazebadian effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT mohammadjowkar effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT amindavoudi effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT amirhosseinfathi effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT mohsenziaei effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy
AT einarberg effectofdifferentcleansingmethodsforremovingtemporarycementonthetensilebondforceofpermanentlycementedimplantsupportedmetalcopingsaninvitrostudy