(Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory

This article explores practices of (de)securitisation in a setting where securitisation, violence and legitimacy interact in complex ways. It is argued that in such settings (de)securitisations need to be analysed in relation to the complexities of violence and security on the ground and to the way...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Holger Stritzel
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Arnold Bergstraesser Institute 2021-04-01
Series:International Quarterly for Asian Studies
Subjects:
Online Access:https://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iqas/article/view/14562
_version_ 1818058337158168576
author Holger Stritzel
author_facet Holger Stritzel
author_sort Holger Stritzel
collection DOAJ
description This article explores practices of (de)securitisation in a setting where securitisation, violence and legitimacy interact in complex ways. It is argued that in such settings (de)securitisations need to be analysed in relation to the complexities of violence and security on the ground and to the way that these are tied to local modalities of legitimisation and delegitimisation. In the highly fragmented Afghan setting, processes of (de)securitisation appear in a context where existing patterns of authority are constantly (re)negotiated and political order is in a continuous process of violent transformation. Conceptually, this suggests the need for a distinctly non-linear and relational reading of securitisation dynamics that challenges the way securitisation theory has traditionally been understood.
first_indexed 2024-12-10T12:59:01Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2ba980b2d2334c2db2f89f2513c5aa7e
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2566-686X
2566-6878
language English
last_indexed 2024-12-10T12:59:01Z
publishDate 2021-04-01
publisher Arnold Bergstraesser Institute
record_format Article
series International Quarterly for Asian Studies
spelling doaj.art-2ba980b2d2334c2db2f89f2513c5aa7e2022-12-22T01:48:00ZengArnold Bergstraesser InstituteInternational Quarterly for Asian Studies2566-686X2566-68782021-04-01521-210.11588/iqas.2021.1-2.14562(Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation TheoryHolger Stritzel This article explores practices of (de)securitisation in a setting where securitisation, violence and legitimacy interact in complex ways. It is argued that in such settings (de)securitisations need to be analysed in relation to the complexities of violence and security on the ground and to the way that these are tied to local modalities of legitimisation and delegitimisation. In the highly fragmented Afghan setting, processes of (de)securitisation appear in a context where existing patterns of authority are constantly (re)negotiated and political order is in a continuous process of violent transformation. Conceptually, this suggests the need for a distinctly non-linear and relational reading of securitisation dynamics that challenges the way securitisation theory has traditionally been understood. https://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iqas/article/view/14562SecuritisationAfghanistannon-Westlegitimisationdelegitimisation
spellingShingle Holger Stritzel
(Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory
International Quarterly for Asian Studies
Securitisation
Afghanistan
non-West
legitimisation
delegitimisation
title (Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory
title_full (Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory
title_fullStr (Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory
title_full_unstemmed (Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory
title_short (Re)reading Afghanistan through the Lens of Securitisation Theory
title_sort re reading afghanistan through the lens of securitisation theory
topic Securitisation
Afghanistan
non-West
legitimisation
delegitimisation
url https://hasp.ub.uni-heidelberg.de/journals/iqas/article/view/14562
work_keys_str_mv AT holgerstritzel rereadingafghanistanthroughthelensofsecuritisationtheory