Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge

Objectives: The authors aim to evaluate a scale assessing oral health knowledge, the KROHL (Knowledge Related to Oral Health Literacy) including the inter-rater reliability for scoring open-ended questions, internal consistency of the hypothesized scales, the discriminant validity of the resulting s...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Silvia Spivakovsky, Yoon Weon Suh, Malvin N. Janal
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:PEC Innovation
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628222000851
_version_ 1811201458033393664
author Silvia Spivakovsky
Yoon Weon Suh
Malvin N. Janal
author_facet Silvia Spivakovsky
Yoon Weon Suh
Malvin N. Janal
author_sort Silvia Spivakovsky
collection DOAJ
description Objectives: The authors aim to evaluate a scale assessing oral health knowledge, the KROHL (Knowledge Related to Oral Health Literacy) including the inter-rater reliability for scoring open-ended questions, internal consistency of the hypothesized scales, the discriminant validity of the resulting scale and its relationship to existing measures of oral health literacy. Methods: The questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interviews to 144 volunteers recruited in the waiting areas of clinics throughout the NYU College of Dentistry.The KROHL questionnaire evaluates oral health knowledge by asking open-ended questions about the appearance, cause, treatment and prevention of caries, gum disease, oral cancer, tooth loss and malocclusion. Those 20 questions were scored to produce scale scores. Demographic information, a self-reported measure of HL and the CMOHK (Comprehensive Measure of Oral Health Knowledge) were also collected.Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients and principal components analysis, by computing Cronbach's alpha and Cohen's kappa, and by comparing group means with ANOVA. Results: Kappa indicated good to excellent agreement among raters for the full and the individual subscales of the KROHL. Cronbach's alpha indicated good consistency of the full scale score, but not the individual scales. The mean (SD) KROHL score was lower in the patient group than in the dental students (13.3 (5.9) vs. 26.1 (4.7), p < .001), and varied directly with education level within the patients. KROHL scores were unrelated to existing measures of health literacy. Conclusions: The KROHL scale is an innovative, reliable and valid tool to assess overall oral health knowledge and provide information to customize educational interventions. Further research is needed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale in multiple settings. Innovation: The innovation of the KROHL tool of assessment of oral health knowledge lies in its ability to scale depth of knowledge within the domains of identification, causes, prevention, and treatment for the most common oral conditions.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:21:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2baebd15e8894008871cf41aa8a801f9
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-6282
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:21:58Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series PEC Innovation
spelling doaj.art-2baebd15e8894008871cf41aa8a801f92022-12-22T03:52:06ZengElsevierPEC Innovation2772-62822022-12-011100100Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledgeSilvia Spivakovsky0Yoon Weon Suh1Malvin N. Janal2Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Pathology, Radiology &amp; Medicine, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA; Corresponding author at: 345 East 24th Street, room 829, New York, NY 10010, USA.New York University School of Dentistry, New York, NY, USA; University of the Pacific Arthur A. Dugoni School of Dentistry, San Francisco, CA, USADepartment of Epidemiology and Health Promotion, NYU College of Dentistry, New York, NY, USAObjectives: The authors aim to evaluate a scale assessing oral health knowledge, the KROHL (Knowledge Related to Oral Health Literacy) including the inter-rater reliability for scoring open-ended questions, internal consistency of the hypothesized scales, the discriminant validity of the resulting scale and its relationship to existing measures of oral health literacy. Methods: The questionnaire was administered via face-to-face interviews to 144 volunteers recruited in the waiting areas of clinics throughout the NYU College of Dentistry.The KROHL questionnaire evaluates oral health knowledge by asking open-ended questions about the appearance, cause, treatment and prevention of caries, gum disease, oral cancer, tooth loss and malocclusion. Those 20 questions were scored to produce scale scores. Demographic information, a self-reported measure of HL and the CMOHK (Comprehensive Measure of Oral Health Knowledge) were also collected.Data were analyzed using Pearson correlation coefficients and principal components analysis, by computing Cronbach's alpha and Cohen's kappa, and by comparing group means with ANOVA. Results: Kappa indicated good to excellent agreement among raters for the full and the individual subscales of the KROHL. Cronbach's alpha indicated good consistency of the full scale score, but not the individual scales. The mean (SD) KROHL score was lower in the patient group than in the dental students (13.3 (5.9) vs. 26.1 (4.7), p < .001), and varied directly with education level within the patients. KROHL scores were unrelated to existing measures of health literacy. Conclusions: The KROHL scale is an innovative, reliable and valid tool to assess overall oral health knowledge and provide information to customize educational interventions. Further research is needed to determine the validity and reliability of the scale in multiple settings. Innovation: The innovation of the KROHL tool of assessment of oral health knowledge lies in its ability to scale depth of knowledge within the domains of identification, causes, prevention, and treatment for the most common oral conditions.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628222000851Oral health knowledgeDisease specific knowledge
spellingShingle Silvia Spivakovsky
Yoon Weon Suh
Malvin N. Janal
Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
PEC Innovation
Oral health knowledge
Disease specific knowledge
title Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
title_full Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
title_fullStr Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
title_full_unstemmed Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
title_short Development of KROHL, a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
title_sort development of krohl a tool for evaluating oral health knowledge
topic Oral health knowledge
Disease specific knowledge
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628222000851
work_keys_str_mv AT silviaspivakovsky developmentofkrohlatoolforevaluatingoralhealthknowledge
AT yoonweonsuh developmentofkrohlatoolforevaluatingoralhealthknowledge
AT malvinnjanal developmentofkrohlatoolforevaluatingoralhealthknowledge