Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina

FloodWise is a pilot project that proposes innovative new approaches for flood disaster resilience by applying nature-based solutions (NBS) in Eastern North Carolina to control water runoff for brief periods after major storm events. We collected production and cost data from primary or secondary so...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Meredith Hovis, Frederick Cubbage, Joseph Chris Hollinger, Theodore Shear, Barbara Doll, J. Jack Kurki-Fox, Daniel Line, Michelle Lovejoy, Bryan Evans, Thomas Potter
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: Elsevier 2022-12-01
Series:Nature-Based Solutions
Subjects:
Online Access:http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411522000088
_version_ 1811202148060364800
author Meredith Hovis
Frederick Cubbage
Joseph Chris Hollinger
Theodore Shear
Barbara Doll
J. Jack Kurki-Fox
Daniel Line
Michelle Lovejoy
Bryan Evans
Thomas Potter
author_facet Meredith Hovis
Frederick Cubbage
Joseph Chris Hollinger
Theodore Shear
Barbara Doll
J. Jack Kurki-Fox
Daniel Line
Michelle Lovejoy
Bryan Evans
Thomas Potter
author_sort Meredith Hovis
collection DOAJ
description FloodWise is a pilot project that proposes innovative new approaches for flood disaster resilience by applying nature-based solutions (NBS) in Eastern North Carolina to control water runoff for brief periods after major storm events. We collected production and cost data from primary or secondary sources and used discounted cash flow and capital budgeting procedures at a 6% discount rate for NBS practices to estimate the amounts of payments necessary for farmland owners to break even to adopt NBS practices. Conventional crop farming was profitable already on suitable lands and served as the business as usual (BAU) case to compare to selected NBS practices. Warm-season pasture, loblolly pine forests and agroforestry, and no-till farming exceeded the 6% hurdle rate. Other conventional farm practices of hardpan breakup, cool-season pastures and trees, and bottomland hardwoods would require total payments of up to $600/acre to break even at 6%. Modifications of existing conservation practices, such as stream buffers, cover crops, silvopasture, and tile outlet terraces and tiling, fell in the second tier of total costs of up to $1,512/acre. Major NBS projects that required substantial earthmoving and flood control structures were more expensive - $3,734/acre for water farming (i.e., retention) with berms, $13,252/acre for a forest wetland bank, and about $88,000/acre for a major flood control wetland - and would displace most of the existing area for farm and forest management. However, larger floodwater structure projects could store more water for more extended periods; these storage quantities and benefits need to be assessed in future research.
first_indexed 2024-04-12T02:33:58Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bb6e6ef13174cb2806de49a14e36193
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2772-4115
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-12T02:33:58Z
publishDate 2022-12-01
publisher Elsevier
record_format Article
series Nature-Based Solutions
spelling doaj.art-2bb6e6ef13174cb2806de49a14e361932022-12-22T03:51:37ZengElsevierNature-Based Solutions2772-41152022-12-012100016Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North CarolinaMeredith Hovis0Frederick Cubbage1Joseph Chris Hollinger2Theodore Shear3Barbara Doll4J. Jack Kurki-Fox5Daniel Line6Michelle Lovejoy7Bryan Evans8Thomas Potter9Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.SA.; Corresponding author.Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.SA.Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.SA.Department of Forestry and Environmental Resources, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.SA.Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.S.A.Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.S.A.Department of Biological and Agricultural Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, N.C., U.S.A.Environmental Defense Fund, Raleigh, NC, U.S.A.North Carolina Association of Soil and Water Conservation Districts, Raleigh, N.C., U.S.A.North Carolina Foundation for Soil and Water Conservation, Raleigh, N.C., U.S.A.FloodWise is a pilot project that proposes innovative new approaches for flood disaster resilience by applying nature-based solutions (NBS) in Eastern North Carolina to control water runoff for brief periods after major storm events. We collected production and cost data from primary or secondary sources and used discounted cash flow and capital budgeting procedures at a 6% discount rate for NBS practices to estimate the amounts of payments necessary for farmland owners to break even to adopt NBS practices. Conventional crop farming was profitable already on suitable lands and served as the business as usual (BAU) case to compare to selected NBS practices. Warm-season pasture, loblolly pine forests and agroforestry, and no-till farming exceeded the 6% hurdle rate. Other conventional farm practices of hardpan breakup, cool-season pastures and trees, and bottomland hardwoods would require total payments of up to $600/acre to break even at 6%. Modifications of existing conservation practices, such as stream buffers, cover crops, silvopasture, and tile outlet terraces and tiling, fell in the second tier of total costs of up to $1,512/acre. Major NBS projects that required substantial earthmoving and flood control structures were more expensive - $3,734/acre for water farming (i.e., retention) with berms, $13,252/acre for a forest wetland bank, and about $88,000/acre for a major flood control wetland - and would displace most of the existing area for farm and forest management. However, larger floodwater structure projects could store more water for more extended periods; these storage quantities and benefits need to be assessed in future research.http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411522000088Rural landscapesNature-based solutionsCostsEconomicsCapital budgetingFlood mitigation
spellingShingle Meredith Hovis
Frederick Cubbage
Joseph Chris Hollinger
Theodore Shear
Barbara Doll
J. Jack Kurki-Fox
Daniel Line
Michelle Lovejoy
Bryan Evans
Thomas Potter
Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina
Nature-Based Solutions
Rural landscapes
Nature-based solutions
Costs
Economics
Capital budgeting
Flood mitigation
title Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina
title_full Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina
title_fullStr Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina
title_full_unstemmed Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina
title_short Determining the costs, revenues, and cost-share payments for the “floodwise” program: Nature-based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern, rural North Carolina
title_sort determining the costs revenues and cost share payments for the floodwise program nature based solutions to mitigate flooding in eastern rural north carolina
topic Rural landscapes
Nature-based solutions
Costs
Economics
Capital budgeting
Flood mitigation
url http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772411522000088
work_keys_str_mv AT meredithhovis determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT frederickcubbage determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT josephchrishollinger determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT theodoreshear determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT barbaradoll determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT jjackkurkifox determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT danielline determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT michellelovejoy determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT bryanevans determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina
AT thomaspotter determiningthecostsrevenuesandcostsharepaymentsforthefloodwiseprogramnaturebasedsolutionstomitigatefloodingineasternruralnorthcarolina