Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology

Since the 1940s, when maritime archaeology was established, the systematic excavation of submerged wrecks began to be refined. Systematic excavations led to the recovery of a vast array of organic and inorganic artefacts, including human and non-human bones and teeth. In order to preserve the materi...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Edda Emanuela Guareschi, Paola Annarosa Magni, Heather G. Berry
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2023-01-01
Series:Heritage
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/6/2/42
_version_ 1797620721576312832
author Edda Emanuela Guareschi
Paola Annarosa Magni
Heather G. Berry
author_facet Edda Emanuela Guareschi
Paola Annarosa Magni
Heather G. Berry
author_sort Edda Emanuela Guareschi
collection DOAJ
description Since the 1940s, when maritime archaeology was established, the systematic excavation of submerged wrecks began to be refined. Systematic excavations led to the recovery of a vast array of organic and inorganic artefacts, including human and non-human bones and teeth. In order to preserve the materials recovered from the sea, the discipline of maritime conservation rapidly expanded and dealt with unique issues, including, but not limited to, marine salts’ encrustation of archaeological artefacts. Bone and teeth are organic artefacts which provide crucial information about natural and social environments of the past. When recovered from marine settings, they are often friable and require conservation processes and consolidation treatments, e.g., to prevent shrinkage during drying. However, conservation processes and consolidants can interfere with pathological, traumatic and taphonomical evidence associated with bone and teeth, and can bias sample preparation and analysis through mechanical action and chemical composition. The aim of this paper, in which a few examples of interference are listed, is to highlight the need of accurately documenting any type of conservation process and/or consolidation treatment that has been performed on bone and teeth stored in archaeological collections. This becomes essential when samples are selected for study, especially if this includes destructive analysis, and will assist in clarifying any conflicting results, leading to reliable interpretations.
first_indexed 2024-03-11T08:45:44Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bbfac0172d748b49c4b18c7b3d9dc26
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2571-9408
language English
last_indexed 2024-03-11T08:45:44Z
publishDate 2023-01-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Heritage
spelling doaj.art-2bbfac0172d748b49c4b18c7b3d9dc262023-11-16T20:47:55ZengMDPI AGHeritage2571-94082023-01-016277978810.3390/heritage6020042Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime ArchaeologyEdda Emanuela Guareschi0Paola Annarosa Magni1Heather G. Berry2School of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, AustraliaSchool of Medical, Molecular and Forensic Sciences, Murdoch University, Murdoch, WA 6150, AustraliaGrimwade Centre for Cultural Materials Conservation (GCCMC), School of Historical and Philosophical Studies (SHAPS), The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, AustraliaSince the 1940s, when maritime archaeology was established, the systematic excavation of submerged wrecks began to be refined. Systematic excavations led to the recovery of a vast array of organic and inorganic artefacts, including human and non-human bones and teeth. In order to preserve the materials recovered from the sea, the discipline of maritime conservation rapidly expanded and dealt with unique issues, including, but not limited to, marine salts’ encrustation of archaeological artefacts. Bone and teeth are organic artefacts which provide crucial information about natural and social environments of the past. When recovered from marine settings, they are often friable and require conservation processes and consolidation treatments, e.g., to prevent shrinkage during drying. However, conservation processes and consolidants can interfere with pathological, traumatic and taphonomical evidence associated with bone and teeth, and can bias sample preparation and analysis through mechanical action and chemical composition. The aim of this paper, in which a few examples of interference are listed, is to highlight the need of accurately documenting any type of conservation process and/or consolidation treatment that has been performed on bone and teeth stored in archaeological collections. This becomes essential when samples are selected for study, especially if this includes destructive analysis, and will assist in clarifying any conflicting results, leading to reliable interpretations.https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/6/2/42desalinationconsolidantParaloid B-72evidencepathologytrauma
spellingShingle Edda Emanuela Guareschi
Paola Annarosa Magni
Heather G. Berry
Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology
Heritage
desalination
consolidant
Paraloid B-72
evidence
pathology
trauma
title Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology
title_full Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology
title_fullStr Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology
title_full_unstemmed Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology
title_short Potential Issues in the Conservation of Bone and Teeth in Maritime Archaeology
title_sort potential issues in the conservation of bone and teeth in maritime archaeology
topic desalination
consolidant
Paraloid B-72
evidence
pathology
trauma
url https://www.mdpi.com/2571-9408/6/2/42
work_keys_str_mv AT eddaemanuelaguareschi potentialissuesintheconservationofboneandteethinmaritimearchaeology
AT paolaannarosamagni potentialissuesintheconservationofboneandteethinmaritimearchaeology
AT heathergberry potentialissuesintheconservationofboneandteethinmaritimearchaeology