Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China

The rapid advancement of remote sensing technology has given rise to numerous global- and regional-scale medium- to high-resolution land cover (LC) datasets, making significant contributions to the exploration of worldwide environmental shifts and the sustainable governance of natural resources. Non...

Full description

Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: Xiangyu Ji, Xujun Han, Xiaobo Zhu, Yajun Huang, Zengjing Song, Jinghan Wang, Miaohang Zhou, Xuemei Wang
Format: Article
Language:English
Published: MDPI AG 2024-03-01
Series:Remote Sensing
Subjects:
Online Access:https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/6/1111
_version_ 1797239430353780736
author Xiangyu Ji
Xujun Han
Xiaobo Zhu
Yajun Huang
Zengjing Song
Jinghan Wang
Miaohang Zhou
Xuemei Wang
author_facet Xiangyu Ji
Xujun Han
Xiaobo Zhu
Yajun Huang
Zengjing Song
Jinghan Wang
Miaohang Zhou
Xuemei Wang
author_sort Xiangyu Ji
collection DOAJ
description The rapid advancement of remote sensing technology has given rise to numerous global- and regional-scale medium- to high-resolution land cover (LC) datasets, making significant contributions to the exploration of worldwide environmental shifts and the sustainable governance of natural resources. Nonetheless, owing to the inherent uncertainties embedded within remote sensing imagery, LC datasets inevitably exhibit inaccuracies. In this study, a local accuracy assessment of LC datasets in Southwest China was conducted. The datasets utilized in our analysis include ESA WorldCover, CLCD, Esri Land Cover, CRLC, FROM-GLC10, GLC_FCS30, GlobeLand30, and SinoLC-1. This study employed a sampling approach that combines proportional allocation and stratified random sampling (SRS) to gather sample points and compute confusion matrices to validate eight LC products. The local accuracy of the eight LC maps differs significantly from the overall accuracy provided by the original authors in Southwest China. ESA WorldCover and CLCD demonstrate higher local accuracy than other products in Southwest China, with their overall accuracy (OA) values being 87.1% and 85.48%, respectively. Simultaneously, we computed the area for each LC map based on categories, quantifying uncertainty through the reporting of confidence intervals for both accuracy and area parameters. This study aims to validate and compare eight LC datasets and assess precision and area of diverse spatial resolution datasets for mapping and monitoring across Southwest China.
first_indexed 2024-04-24T17:51:25Z
format Article
id doaj.art-2bccbe3e61b04908b2ac763158d837cb
institution Directory Open Access Journal
issn 2072-4292
language English
last_indexed 2024-04-24T17:51:25Z
publishDate 2024-03-01
publisher MDPI AG
record_format Article
series Remote Sensing
spelling doaj.art-2bccbe3e61b04908b2ac763158d837cb2024-03-27T14:02:54ZengMDPI AGRemote Sensing2072-42922024-03-01166111110.3390/rs16061111Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest ChinaXiangyu Ji0Xujun Han1Xiaobo Zhu2Yajun Huang3Zengjing Song4Jinghan Wang5Miaohang Zhou6Xuemei Wang7Chongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaChongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaChongqing Engineering Research Center for Spatial Big Data Intelligent Technology, Chongqing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Chongqing 400065, ChinaChongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaChongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaChongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaChongqing Jinfo Mountain National Field Scientific Observation and Research Station for Karst Ecosystem, School of Geographical Sciences, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaSouthwest University Library, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, ChinaThe rapid advancement of remote sensing technology has given rise to numerous global- and regional-scale medium- to high-resolution land cover (LC) datasets, making significant contributions to the exploration of worldwide environmental shifts and the sustainable governance of natural resources. Nonetheless, owing to the inherent uncertainties embedded within remote sensing imagery, LC datasets inevitably exhibit inaccuracies. In this study, a local accuracy assessment of LC datasets in Southwest China was conducted. The datasets utilized in our analysis include ESA WorldCover, CLCD, Esri Land Cover, CRLC, FROM-GLC10, GLC_FCS30, GlobeLand30, and SinoLC-1. This study employed a sampling approach that combines proportional allocation and stratified random sampling (SRS) to gather sample points and compute confusion matrices to validate eight LC products. The local accuracy of the eight LC maps differs significantly from the overall accuracy provided by the original authors in Southwest China. ESA WorldCover and CLCD demonstrate higher local accuracy than other products in Southwest China, with their overall accuracy (OA) values being 87.1% and 85.48%, respectively. Simultaneously, we computed the area for each LC map based on categories, quantifying uncertainty through the reporting of confidence intervals for both accuracy and area parameters. This study aims to validate and compare eight LC datasets and assess precision and area of diverse spatial resolution datasets for mapping and monitoring across Southwest China.https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/6/1111land cover datasetsspatial accuracy assessmentarea comparisonremote sensing
spellingShingle Xiangyu Ji
Xujun Han
Xiaobo Zhu
Yajun Huang
Zengjing Song
Jinghan Wang
Miaohang Zhou
Xuemei Wang
Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China
Remote Sensing
land cover datasets
spatial accuracy assessment
area comparison
remote sensing
title Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China
title_full Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China
title_fullStr Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China
title_full_unstemmed Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China
title_short Comparison and Validation of Multiple Medium- and High-Resolution Land Cover Products in Southwest China
title_sort comparison and validation of multiple medium and high resolution land cover products in southwest china
topic land cover datasets
spatial accuracy assessment
area comparison
remote sensing
url https://www.mdpi.com/2072-4292/16/6/1111
work_keys_str_mv AT xiangyuji comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT xujunhan comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT xiaobozhu comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT yajunhuang comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT zengjingsong comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT jinghanwang comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT miaohangzhou comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina
AT xuemeiwang comparisonandvalidationofmultiplemediumandhighresolutionlandcoverproductsinsouthwestchina